Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

INFORMATION AUDIT - THE METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS (Audyt informacji - problemy metodologiczne)

100%

Materska K.

e-mentor

|

2011

|

nr 5 (42)

56-63

EN

The article characterizes and compares four most commonly discussed in literature methodological approaches to information audit: InfoMap, Information flow analysis, Integrated Strategic Approach and Information audit. The aim of the study is to make it easier to choose the methodology adequate for the individual needs' of a particular organization.

2

Metodologiczne podłoże bioetyki

100%

Adamkiewicz M.

Archeus. Studia z bioetyki i antropologii filozoficznej

|

2012

|

tom 13

5-20

EN

The article in a historical way shows development of the modern bioethicThe article in a historical way shows development of the modern bioethics and its methodological status. Bioethics is seen as an interdisciplinary ﬁeld that is used for explaining complex biomedical issues, describing the nature and direction of changes in science and technology. The text shows the main research ﬁelds of bioethics, which include theoretical, clinical, legal, political, and cultural aspects. The list of problem areas within the scope of bioethics emphasizes on the one hand the diversity of its interests, and on the other hand suggests the need for a holistic approach to contemporary moral issues that directly penetrate into the realm of biological existence and survival. The article in a historical way shows development of the modern bioethics and its methodological status. Bioethics is seen as an interdisciplinary ﬁeld that is used for explaining complex biomedical issues, describing the nature and direction of changes in science and technology. The text shows the main research ﬁelds of bioethics, which include theoretical, clinical, legal, political, and cultural aspects. The list of problem areas within the scope of bioethics emphasizes on the one hand the diversity of its interests, and on the other hand suggests the need for a holistic approach to contemporary moral issues that directly penetrate into the realm of biological existence and survival. The article in a historical way shows development of the modern bioethics and its methodological status. Bioethics is seen as an interdisciplinary ﬁeld that is used for explaining complex biomedical issues, describing the nature and direction of changes in science and technology. The text shows the main research ﬁelds of bioethics, which include theoretical, clinical, legal, political, and cultural aspects. The list of problem areas within the scope of bioethics emphasizes on the one hand the diversity of its interests, and on the other hand suggests the need for a holistic approach to contemporary moral issues that directly penetrate into the realm of biological existence and survival. s and its methodological status. Bioethics is seen as an interdisciplinary ﬁeld that is used for explaining complex biomedical issues, describing the nature and direction of changes in science and technology. The text shows the main research ﬁelds of bioethics, which include theoretical, clinical, legal, political, and cultural aspects. The list of problem areas within the scope of bioethics emphasizes on the one hand the diversity of its interests, and on the other hand suggests the need for a holistic approach to contemporary moral issues that directly penetrate into the realm of biological existence and survival.

3

MUSICAL TEXT: NEW RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE 21ST CENTURY (Tekst muzyczny: nowe perspektywy badawcze u progu XXI wieku)

100%

Caraci-Vela M.

Przegląd Muzykologiczny

|

2004

|

nr 4

147-159

EN

The essay discusses objectives and developments of modern musical philology and its interdisciplinary contexts. The authoress takes as a point of departure the notion of musical text, whose status and outlines needs redefining in order to allow for the meaning of the text to be developed. Musical philology looks at the text and its existence through time from three complementary points of view: the author's elaborative process; the process of tradition; and the phenomenon of reception. The methodological evolution and gradual critical enrichment of the discipline can clearly be seen in the main research fields of philology in the second half of the 19th century. Several important areas can be outlined here, which have been heavily developed but are still far from exhausted: the relationship between text and notation and between writing and orality; the historical and cognitive value of traditional variants of the text; the developments of author-focused philology (including issues of authenticity and attribution); intertextual phenomena; relationships between textual traditions and reception of musical works; and finally, relationships between medieval music philology and the current of New Philology. The persistence of outdated or unrigorous methodologies notwithstanding, musical philology has been enriched in the last decades by important contributions, which have helped to revitalize its perspectives and interests.

4

Excavation as Theatre

100%

Tilley C.

Przegląd Archeologiczny

|

2004

|

tom 52

5-13

EN

The aim of this paper is to provide a theoretical and conceptual justification for large-scale rescue excavations. The article begins by challenging a predominant view, in which excavations are regarded as a process of rescuing the traces of the past in order to inhibit their potential destruction. But, it is argued, prevailing practices in archaeology leads to a pathological situation in which the technical instrumentation and the production of descriptive observational statements tends to become the principal goals of the discipline. The author points out that instead of emphasizing the development of conceptual structures which might help us understand how to interpret the past, we tend to accumulate more and more information with which in reality very little is done. This leads to the view that any further excavations remain largely unjustified. However, if excavations are conceived as experiments in interpretative activity, then they may play a central role in the development of a more reflexive and mature archaeological practice. To understand the discourses produced by archaeologists, relationships between the excavation and the site report and between excavations, the archaeological community and the public are explored. Indeed, contrary to the standard informational report, based on the myth of pure objectivity, an analogy to the dramatic performance is suggested. In this approach, the site report is considered as an effect of never ending interpretative activity, displayed in the theatre of excavation. The report is a result of a process of selection, recording, organization, inclusion and exclusion which takes place from the perspectives of different individuals and groups, and the discussions and relationships developed on the site. We might envision a site report which reflects back on excavation and critically interrogates all uncertainties. A reflection on some of these ambiguities and contradictions can help us understand how we may write differently and begin to challenge certain superannuated dominant practices. Therefore large-scale complex excavations and their reports provide unique opportunities for experiments in self-discovery. The exceptional position of an archaeological 'database' creates special responsibilities to society. The currently emerging cult of professionalism drastically reduces the scope of social vision, leaving in archaeologists' hands the decision as to which vision of the past the public should be provided with. If we want to appreciate the past and thus value it, we have to actively involve the public in discussion and interpretation of the past. Here excavation has a unique role to play as a theatre where people may be able to produce their own pasts which are meaningful to them. This approach advocates a socially engaged rather than a scientifically detached practice of excavation.(The paper appeared earlier in English in 'ANTIQUITY' vol.63(1989), pp. 275-280)

5

ON THE PARADOXICAL BASES OF MODERN SPEECH METHODOLOGY

100%

Pazukhin R.

Lingua Posnaniensis

|

2006

|

tom 48

95-110

EN

The aim of the article is to comment on the foundations of modern speech methodology. Modern speech theory rests on the concession that speech utterances are chains of discrete phonological units (individual 'sounds', 'phonemes', 'phones' etc.). Trying to unveil the postulated 'segments' in the continuous speech signal, three main versions of the speech segmentalism were proposed, based on the concepts of the 'microscopic', 'hidden' and 'mental' segmentation respectively. Vain pursuits for more than a hundred years have, however, discovered no trace of the sought 'segments' in speech flow. The crucial question of our speech investigations now remains: to proceed, or not to proceed any further, with this fruitless quest for 'speech segmentation'? The application of the so-called 'existential test' (an abstract analytic method used to appreciate the adequacy of empiric hypotheses) to the speech segmentation concept reveals the supposed 'phonological segments' being nothing more than self-contradictory methodological fiction. These 'segments' can never be found in speech wave.

6

ČÍTANIE ODZADU: ČO NEMUSELO VYJSŤ, ALE VYŠLO

80%

Marcelli M.

Slovenský národopis (Slovak Ethnology)

|

2012

|

tom 60

|

nr 4

415 – 424

EN

This paper is concerned with the contributions which the review section of Slovak Ethnology published during the period from the journal’s inception to the end of the 1980s. Attention is focused on those reviews which were unforced, i.e. which drew attention to publications whose importance was not determined by the officially sanctioned plans for scholarly activity. The paper shows how these reviews, by drawing attention to foreign publications and projects, contributed to extending the research field and differentiating methodological premises.

7

WHO ARE THE SIGNIFICANT OTHERS IN THE LEARNING PROCESS?

80%

Wysocka M.

Linguistica Silesiana

|

2007

|

tom 28

267-279

EN

The article provides a brief insight into the position and influence of the so-called .significant others in the learning process. To be more specific, the paper aims at distinguishing an individual who helps the learner to learn a language, presenting the characteristics of the .important figure, and defining the roles the person plays in learners' lives. The research findings emphasize a valuable contribution and effort the important figures take in order to shape learners' emotional states and attitudes towards learning, the language itself, and the TLC.

8

ANDREJ MELICHERČÍK – OSOBNOSŤ V DOBE, DOBA V OSOBNOSTI (NA PRÍKLADE JEDNEJ BÁDATEĽSKEJ TÉMY)

80%

Hlôšková H.

Slovenský národopis (Slovak Ethnology)

|

2018

|

tom 66

|

nr 1

140 – 155

EN

Andrej Melicherčík, CSc. (1917–1966) is one of the founding personalities of professional folklore studies in Slovakia. During his studies of Slovak and German at the Slovak University (today, Comenius University) in Bratislava, he was largely influenced by the lectures of P. G. Bogatyryov who was at that time working at the Bratislava university. Bogatyryov’s application of functional structuralism was an inspiration for Melicherčík’s research and theoretical thinking about the phenomena of traditional culture, specifically folklore, but the paper also focuses on Melicherčík’s application of the so-called Marxist methodology. The article deals with the thematic and methodological contexts of Melicherčík’s significant work on the contemporary historical and political turning points of the 20thcentury in Czechoslovakia. The author focused on one of the dominant topics of Melicherčík’s research programme– the robber/Jánošík tradition, and describes the underlying conceptual contexts and the methodological tools used. The objects of analysis were Melicherčík’s monograph books on this topic and chapters in synthesis works.

9

Rola intuicji w poznaniu filozoficznym. Między kontekstem odkrycia a kontekstem uzasadnienia

80%

Kołodziejczyk S. T.

Kwartalnik Filozoficzny

|

2017

|

tom 45

|

nr 4

5-35

EN

Intuition belongs to the most prominent concepts of philosophical methodology. In my paper I put forward some crucial ideas related to the notion of intuition. Firstly, I sketch a general picture of intuition in philosophy. Secondly, the main debates about intuition in analytical philosophy are presented and discussed. Finally, it is argued that the aforementioned debates are not clear about the epistemic and explanatory status of intuition. My own view is that intuition may be a very useful power for initiating philosophical cognition, but at the same time it does not look promising when it is interpreted as a cognitive power for justification of philosophical knowledge.

10

ASSESSING THE LEGITIMACY OF THE CHANGES OF COPYRIGHT WORKS. METHODOLOGICAL PREVIEW UNDER THE CZECH LAW (Posuzovani opravnenosti zmeny autorskeho dila. Metodicky nahled podle ceskeho prava)

80%

Telec I.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

|

2010

|

tom 93

|

nr 4

303-311

EN

The article is devoted to the legal assessment of the legitimacy of changes in eligibility of the copyright works under the Czech law. The article is structured as a methodological guide. Part of the paper deals with the description of the changes of the work (f. i. the modification) which occurred or to occur in the future. Other questions are focused on the practical or legal reasons for the modification of the works. Finally, the issues are focused on the different factual and creative elements of the work that are affected by changing of the work and on the influence of the changes to the aesthetic value of the copyright work.

11

HOW TO CONDUCT AND REPORT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS: CONSORT GUIDELINES (Jak przeprowadzac i opisywac eksperymentalne badania psychologoczne: wytyczne Consort, tekst instruktazowy)

80%

Luszczynska A. , Dolinski D.

Psychological Studies

|

2008

|

tom 46

|

nr 3

57-64

EN

The paper discusses 'CONSORT' (the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials) guidelines referring to planning, preparation, and conducting randomized controlled trials in different areas of psychology. Becoming widely accepted across psychology journals, CONSORT offers presentation standards that allow for both easier and precise comparison of research as well as facilitate concluding from presented results. In particular, the authors addressed suggestions referring to randomization rules, inclusion criteria, intention to treat analysis, selection of primary and secondary outcomes, sample size determination, and employing effect sizes.

12

VOCABULARY LEARNING TECHNIQUES IN THIRD LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. HOW STUDENTS OF ENGLISH LEARNING GERMAN ORGANIZE THEIR PROCESS OF VOCABULARY ACQUISITION (German title - below)

80%

Tobiasz L.

Linguistica Silesiana

|

2008

|

tom 29

141-152

EN

(Title in German - WORTSCHATZLERNTECHNIKEN IM TERTIÄRSPRACHERWERB. WIE DEUTSCH LERNENDE ANGLISTIKSTUDENTEN IHRE LEXIKALISCHEN ERWERBSPROZESSE ORGANISIEREN). This article presents the results of a study carried out at the English Department of the University of Silesia among students in their 4th and 5th year. They learned English (L2) and German (L3 for the majority of them) in a translation group. Some of the students have also learnt another foreign language or other foreign languages. The study focused on lexical techniques used by the learners for the acquisition of German vocabulary. It shows that the students find out a word's meaning, memorize and retrieve it with the help of various semantic techniques, such as contextualization, visualization, association, translation into Polish or English, repetition, structuring, connecting, differentiation, learning by doing and multimodal acquisition. The data confirm the hypothesis of the author that experienced language learners organize their learning process in a highly individual way and try to make it more efficient by using different learning strategies and techniques.

13

Historiografia Władysława Tatarkiewicza w kontekście sporów metodologicznych

80%

Nowik A. M.

Filo-Sofija

|

2011

|

tom 11

|

nr 2-3(13-14)

495-503

EN

The purpose of this article is to show the main trends in philosophy that influenced Władyslaw Tatarkiewicz’s science research, with special consideration of neo-Kantianism (the Marburg and the Baden Schools). Władysław Tatarkiewicz, one of the most significant polish historians of philosophy, rarely made comments on his preferred methods and on his concept of history of philosophy. Nevertheless, many of the methodological issues raised by Tatarkiewicz are focused on the problem of historical synthesis, at which the historian is obliged to make specific assessment concerning the subject matter of the research. Tatarkiewicz’s position on historiography indicates its relationship with remaining humanistic disciplines.

14

Jak se mi psaly a jak (možná) psát dějiny lingvistiky

80%

Cerny J.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

|

2010

|

tom 93

|

nr 4-5

180-189

EN

The article deals with the author's publications in the area general linguistics (in particular Dejiny lingvistiky, Czech version, Olomouc 1996; Historia de la Lingueistica, Spanish version, Caceres 1998; Male dejiny lingvistiky, Czech version, Prague 2005) and Czech linguistics (Kdo je kdo v dejinach ceske lingvistiky, Prague 2008; Lexicon Grammaticorum, Tuebingen 2009). It also includes remarks on methodology and observations on possible future developments in the discipline.

15

Polityka w pięciu odsłonach: metatypologia zjawiska

80%

Czajowski A.

Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne

|

2011

|

tom 12

5-25

EN

The notions of “politics” and “political character” are more intuitive than scientific. They make difficult any distinguishing what is general, universal or political. They have a lot of logical mistakes in the definitions of political phenomena and also of typological shortages of such behaviors, like the political ones. The researchers try to classify a variety of concepts of politics. These categorizations capture the politics as it is commonly seen. For these reasons, they are insufficient. We need a comprehensive typology, capable of introducing the discipline, more precision as to the classification criteria, without demonstrating what the politics is. Taking into account my previous remarks, I propose the following approaches to this phenomenon: 1. common; 2. material and ideological-doctrinaire; 3. theoretical; 4. methodological; 5. sectional. Only within such general types, one might classify the politics according to its constituent characteristics and its different understandings.

16

K METODOLÓGII PRÁCE S ROZPRÁVANÝMI A NAPÍSANÝMI ŽIVOTNÝMI PRÍBEHMI/ŽIVOTOPISMI

80%

Herzánová Ľ.

Etnologické rozpravy (Ethnological Disputes)

|

2004

|

tom 11

|

nr 2

90-94

EN

The paper deals with methodological questions concerning the work with oral and written life stories. The authoress subscribes to the approach to the biography as a social construct, social reality itself. Despite the growing amount of theoretical works dealing with analysis of this kind of source, there are voices against it, criticising its subjectivity and lack of theoretical background. The answer to this critique is directed towards the other group of researchers who search for 'almighty objectivity'. Both approaches ('qualitative' vs. 'quantitative') seem to bear a problematic core inside. Together with Gabriele Rosenthal the authoress looks for the solution in the dualistic conception of the history and the told story, the event and the experience, the lived and the told, where by the analysis we should consider both sides of the story. On one side the life of people is taking place on the background of the historical - social reality, on the other side the social reality is constructed through the lives of people.

17

K SAMOTNÉMU DĚLENÍ ANALYTICKÉ VS. KONTINENTÁLNÍ FILOZOFIE

80%

Šebela K.

Filozofia (Philosophy)

|

2021

|

tom 76

|

nr 7

521 – 530

EN

The paper deals with the very idea of distinction between analytical and continental philosophy, so it is primarily methodological. The aim is to criticize this division. Criticism is conducted from the point of view of analytical philosophy. The arguments are of three kinds: a) factual – evidence from the history of contemporary philosophy, pointing to analytical philosophers working on the continent (Frege, Carnap, etc.) and at the same time to non-analytical philosophers outside the continent (American pragmatism, etc.); b) methodological – it is a division of contemporary philosophy, is it complete, exclusive, what is the criterion of division? It is divided according to both geographical and systematic criteria. This will point out the illogicality of the division itself; c) power – the division is conducted by analytical philosophy as a manifestation of its hegemony, it is actually a division of analytical vs. non-analytical philosophies. Thus, in conclusion, I will focus on the possibility and necessity of dividing philosophy, such as movements, disciplines, philosophers, as well as the purposes – educational, research, etc. The division of philosophy according to problem areas is considered less misleading.

18

FAMILY STUDIES METHOD IN BEHAVIOR GENETICS. REPLY TO EWA WITKOWSKA AND BARTOSZ WITKOWSKI

80%

Siwy H. A.

Psychologia-Etologia-Genetyka

|

2007

|

tom 16

101-108

EN

The aim of this article is to discuss family studies method with its restrictions and to reply to the article placed in one of the previous volumes of the Psychology - Ethology - Genetics. The authors focused on reservations about construction and estimation of models used in the authoress research based on the family studies method. In response to comments model assumptions were discussed, relationships between particular variables were explained and estimation methods with statistical tests for model's goodness of fit were presented.

19

ON THE FORMATION AND CONDUCT OF GARDEN HISTORY

80%

Hunt J. D.

Rocznik Historii Sztuki

|

2009

|

tom 34

5-11

EN

The author states that garden history has established two unavoidable trajectories. The first is the investigation of the design and formal evolution of individual sites; this involves land holdings, patronage, available design skills and above all a focus upon formal moves, usually drawn first on paper and then transferred onto the ground. Art and architectural historians found this approach congenial and even familiar. The second trajectory sought to elucidate why sites were created in those ways: what were the motives of patrons, the education and inclinations of designers (including their knowledge of earlier forms), all of which tended towards a focus upon the meaning that a designed site held for its original creators and owners. Philosophers, historians of science and literary critics were particularly drawn to this mode of history. Both those approaches privileged the design of original sites, but what they did not generally seek to understand was how subsequent generations saw or (perhaps) remodeled the original designs. Garden history has been growing and developing rapidly over the last 30 or 40 years. The range of the subject along with the sheer quantity of work now produced in the larger history of landscape has increased by leaps and bounds. One must acknowledge here the considerable contributions – in both number and intellectual thrust – that have emerged in Europe (France most prominently, but Italy also) from a whole range of landscape architects, philosophers, geographers, and cultural commentators and historians of all sorts. Recognition of the ineluctably multi-disciplinary nature of garden historical enquiry, and the contributions to the subject therefore from an increased number of specialists in other fields, make every new endeavour potentially more challenging.

20

KIERKEGAARD’S RELATION TO HEGEL AND QUELLENFORSCHUNG: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

80%

Stewart J.

Filozofia (Philosophy)

|

2013

|

tom 68

|

nr 1

17 – 26

EN

This article attempts to demonstrate the advantages of using the methodology of Quellenforschung or source work research when approaching the corpus of Søren Kierkegaard. The field of Kierkegaard studies has been long dominated by a number of misconceptions concerning the Danish thinker’s relation to Hegel, which has almost invariably been portrayed as singularly negative and critical. This article applies source work research to three different passages from Kierkegaard’s primary texts, where his alleged polemic with Hegel is thought to be in evidence. However, when the actual sources of his criticisms are determined, an entirely different picture emerges and the role of Hegel fades into the background.