Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: ANGER

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

APPRAISAL COMPONENTS IN ANGER AND ANGER COPING

100%

Perez N. M. A. , Miguel T. J. J. , Redondo M. M.

Studia Psychologica

2009

tom 51

nr 2-3

123-136

The present paper investigates the appraisal contents associated with anger and the different means of controlling and expressing this emotion. With a sample of 121 participants, a Likert-type scale was used to measure Scherer's dimensions of appraisal (1997) and Smith and Lazarus's components of appraisal (1993). The factor analysis (Oblimin with Kaiser Rotation) produces four appraisal factors. A discriminating analysis is also used to assess the discriminative validity of these four factors when it comes to sorting groups by their degree of experience, expression and anger control as measured by the STAXI 2 (Spielberger, 2000). The results show that harmful and other-accountability appraisals seem to have a strong effect on the way how anger is experienced and expressed.

ANGER: EXPRESSING FEELINGS THROUGH IDIOMS AS AN EXAMPLE OF LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION OF REALITY (La colere: la manifestation des sentiments au moyen des expressions figées comme un exemple de la LRR)

75%

Lazarczyk M. , Wojciechowska A.

Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny

2010

tom 57

nr 3

335-351

The paper is devoted to the analysis of the world of feelings from the cognitive linguistics perspective. The authors have used more than 400 idioms from French, English and Polish to examine anger and its occurrence in language. Selected cognitive issues are sketched in the article and basic properties of idioms are defined and described. The authors compare syntactic schemes, study equivalence, metaphors, search for similarities and dissimilarities. As idioms are an integral part of each language, the analysis permits to discover linguistic representation of reality (LRR). Although anger is a common feeling, the studied material shows that the variety of idioms cause differences in the LRR.

THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS IN DECISION-MAKING

75%

Perez N. M. A. , Fernandez-Abascal E. G. , Miguel-Tobal J. J.

Studia Psychologica

2009

tom 51

nr 4

305-318

This article reviews many results of recent investigations in areas related to decision-making. The classic conception of a rational human being is yielding to new, more complex and integrated formulations in which emotional and affective aspects occupy a prominent position. Decision-making is tackled from different points of view, among which the neurological one plays a major role, and the evidence obtained in studies on positive affect, impulsivity and several emotions such as anger and sadness is reviewed. On the whole, the results show that any explanation of the way a human being makes decisions must necessarily consider emotional and affective states, so as not to make the mistake of using limited and biased explicative models.

EXPRESSIVISM AND THE NATURALIZATION OF THE LANGUAGE OF MORALS: ON THE FRUITFULNESS OF EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE IN METAETHICS (Naturalizacja jezyka etycznego w ramach ekspresywizmu, czyli o owocnosci perspektywy ewolucjonistycznej w metaetyce)

63%

Kuzniar A.

Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne

2010

nr 12

91-105

Descriptivists' method of naturalizing moral language is neither the only nor the most promising one in metaethics. The paper deals with attempts to combine the expressivistic account of moral concepts with an evolutionary research programme. As Allan Gibbard (1990, p. 70) puts it: 'Normative discussion is part of nature but it does not describe nature'. First, Gibbard's expressivism is outlined against the background of the theory of evolution. Then the Author proceeds to his own metaethical theory according to which, to take but one example, the judgment that 'a' is morally wrong consists of a belief that it is possible to avoid a, a belief that there is a universal property 'P' which 'a' exemplifies, a desire not to actualize 'a', a disposition (1) to desire not to actualize anything that instantiates the property 'P', and a disposition (2) to desire to subject everyone who does 'a' to coercive measures (including punishment). Language thus interpreted is shown to be an opposite tool for negotiating a stable normative consensus; it addresses specific problems of cooperation viewed from the evolutionary perspective. Finally, it is argued that the Author's proposal exhibits some important advantages over Gibbard's theory.