This paper focuses on the issue of whether the boundaries of the private lives of judges are shaped according to cultural conditions and gender. My main assumption is that gender inequality in a culture is reflected in how the boundaries of the private life of judges are interpreted. In this regard, women judges may face more restrictions than their male colleagues in what they wear, what they do and what they say in their lives generally. And ultimately, an interpretation of private life that reinforces gender roles also limits the freedom of expression. I concretise my discussion regarding gender stereotypes that influence what judges do or say in their private lives in different cultures.
We claim that to combat stereotyping regarding gender inequalities in law, students should gain ethical awareness which includes awareness of prejudices and stereotypes. For this reason, we organized our clinical legal education in such a way as to combat students’ bias and make a transformation. In our lectures we used transformative methodology that includes intersectional analysis. In this article we explain our educational experience and describe our courses with its main principles.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.