Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 11

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper diagnoses the condition of the contemporary linguistics from the viewpoint of “the power of discourse” and, specifically, the competition of “paradigms” (according to T. Kuhn’s definition) determining the object, goals and methods of research and the manner of presenting knowledge in the discursive community of linguists. Identifying the basic difficulties hindering a change of a paradigm or at least a reconstruction of the hierarchy of the prevalent methodologies in the contemporary linguistics is the aim of the discussions presented in the paper. The author states that linguistics has been at the crossroads of opposite trends, which – to simplify the issue slightly – can be linked with structuralism on the one hand and cognitivism on the other, for some time now. The former paradigm is related to scientism, which imposes the status of an exact, autonomous science limited to grammar on linguistics; the latter one prefers an interdisciplinary approach with the objective of integrating the study of language with other fields of knowledge, and primarily of the operation of the human brain and the process of communication within a community with the use of linguistic symbols, set for linguists. The author proves that the competition of diverse theories and research methods is a manifestation of the desired creativity and openness of linguistics as a discipline within humanities. Negative effects of a given paradigm’s dominance are concerned more with evaluating research works according to traditional criteria imposed by exact sciences.
EN
Attention was focused on 19th century economic terms of Romance origin, used in the Polish press dedicated to economic matters. These are mainly names acquired from French (also via German), popularised in the 19th century, or words previously borrowed from Latin, but gaining new economic references under the influence of associated and similar Gallicisms. A less abundant, but noticeable layer of Romanisms in economic journalism, are loanwords from Italian, which are internationalisms, mainly preserved, also in the borrowing languages, in their original form. Polonised Italianisms were first assimilated in French (sometimes also in German). This article analyses assimilation methods of foreign common names, such as: phonetic, spelling and inflectional adaptation, replication of foreign morphological and phraseological structures using native formative elements, semantic specialisation of certain names of Latin origin under the influence of related French or Italian lexemes.
EN
 The subject of the observation on is the Polish economic lexis used in the discourse on economy: agriculture, industry, trade, and financial operations. Its present composition, with a considerable share of borrowings from English, is an effect of the development of the capitalist socioeconomic formation. New symbols have layered on top of the abundant lexical substratum composed of native units as well as Germanisms and Latinisms, including those of Greek provenance, which has been gradually enriched over the centuries. The aim of the analysis is to identify the development trends in the lexical layer that have evolved into the current Polish economic discourse, with a particular focus on the dynamics, extent, and nature of foreign-language influences. The statistical comparison of the lexical resource of three journalistic texts of similar volumes, representative of successive periods of the development of the economic discourse in the Polish language, permits the ascertainment that the broadest assimilation of non-Slavic components into the Polish economic lexis took place in the 19th century.
PL
Przedmiotem obserwacji jest polska leksyka ekonomiczna, używana w dyskursie o gospodarce: rolnictwie, przemyśle, handlu i operacjach finansowych. Jej obecny kształt ze znaczącym udziałem zapożyczeń z języka angielskiego jest wynikiem rozwoju kapitalistycznej formacji społeczno-ekonomicznej. Nowe symbole nawarstwiły się na obfity, wzbogacany przez wieki substrat leksykalny, złożony z jednostek rodzimych oraz germanizmów i latynizmów, także tych o greckiej proweniencji. Celem analizy jest wskazanie tych tendencji rozwojowych w warstwie leksykalnej, których rezultatem jest obecny kształt polskiego dyskursu ekonomicznego, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem dynamiki, zakresu i charakteru wpływów innojęzycznych. Porównanie statystyczne zasobu leksykalnego trzech tekstów publicystycznych o porównywalnym rozmiarze, reprezentatywnych dla kolejnych okresów rozwoju dyskursu ekonomicznego w polszczyźnie, pozwala stwierdzić, że najszersza asymilacja niesłowiańskich elementów w polskiej leksyce ekonomicznej miała miejsce w XIX wieku.
5
100%
EN
After 1989, capitalism – as an ideology (a political system) and a set of practices concentrated in the economic sphere – has strongly shaped interpersonal relationships, linguistic acts and the social picture of the world, including its fundamental values, of Poles in general. The author of this paper makes a preliminary investigation into axio-linguistic aspects in a broader context of the issue related to the reception of the capitalist discourse in the Polish cultural and linguistic space. The connection of this ideological system with values should be considered in regard to three dimensions: 1) in the domain of crucial ideas, such as: liberty, property, individualism, on which capitalism is founded; 2) in the field of positive or negative evaluation dependent on opposite perspectives of discourse participants and related to the different constituents of the formation system, i.e. employed / unemployed, flexible contract/ junk contract, tax/ tribute; 3) in relation to the values encompassed by the Polish tradition, such as: community, justice, equality, solidarity, which can serve as reference points for the anti-capitalist (critical) discourse.  
EN
The observations described in this páper are concemed with the linguistic discourse analysis carried out by representatives of the contemporary French school, the members o f which include among others: Jean-Michel Adam, Patrick Charaudeau, Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, and Dominique Maingueneau (some of them come from Swiss and Belgian French-speaking communities). The domain of their research, the most impor- tant traditions, as well as the sources of inspiration and relations between the examined field with other scientific disciplines (not only linguistics) are the principál subjects un- der discussion in this páper. The achievements o f the French school in the area o f dis­ course analysis prove the integrative naturę of the disciplině, which combines various fields of study o f language, style and text, that is in particular: stylistics (including rhetoric and the theory o f a literary work of art), pragmatics and text linguistics. The author demonstrates also the significance o f the relations between discourse analysis and other Sciences: philosophy, cognítive science, psychology and sociology, at the same time emphasizing that the broadly defined inlerdisciplinary studies remain (for various reasons) in the sphere of postulates. Among the many obstacles is the separation of sociál Sciences in the 20lh century.
7
Content available remote O semantyce zaimków
100%
EN
A subject of the article is the meaning of pronominal lexemes, which are treated in general linguistic studies as “non-notional” words or even words deprived of any meaning. In the first part of the article the author proves that pronouns are symbols of general notional categories whereas their substitutional function is subordinated to deixis. In the second part of the article the author presents the proposal at the classification of pronouns according to functional-se- mantic criteria whereas in the third part she shows a semantic potential of the analyzed class of lexemes as exemplified by the use of indefinite pronoun in selected poetic texts by Wisława Szymborska.
EN
This paper analyses international collocations, winged words and aphoristic phrases being components of capitalist discourse, which has been intensively adapted by Poles since 1989, such as: wolny rynek (free market), wolna konkurencja (free competition), własność prywatna (private property), kapitał spekulacyjny (risk capital), prowadzić biznes (to run a business), zaciągnąć kredyt (to take out a loan), niewidzialna ręka rynku (the invisible hand), gra interesów (an interplay of interests), raj podatkowy (a tax haven), pracować w szarej strefie/ na czarno (to work in the grey economy / informal sector), wpaść w spiralę długów (to fall into a debt spiral); Pieniądz nie śpi (Money never sleeps), Kapitał nie ma narodowości (Capital has no nationality), Nie ma darmowych lunchów (There is no such thing as a free lunch), Dajemy wędkę, nie rybę (Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime); Gospodarka, głupcze! (Economy, stupid!). A broad reception of this type of phrases in the colloquial Polish language and their frequent reproductions in journalistic texts and comments published in recent years on popular Polish web portals have been noticed. It has been proved that experts featured in the media (economists, politicians, lawyers, and journalists) shape the collective mentality by means of collocations, which are to a large extent calques of the corresponding expressions and phrases used in English-language texts, reproduced in the discourse. They serve the purpose of imposing a common ideologically conceptualised view of reality on discourse participants. Hence, the quoted collocations are treated in this paper as carriers of the capitalist worldview and a substantial component of communicative competence of public discourse participants, which fulfi ls several significant functions characterised in this paper as: nominative (referential), persuasive and evaluative functions.
EN
The observations presented in this paper fall within the confines of a plan covering a broader scope of research on the key notions underlying the constitution and polarisation of the Polish economic discourse on popular web portals. The idealised cognitive models (ICMs) of “work”, actualised in the discourse, are subject to a linguistic reconstruction and the methodological principle consists in an analysis of semantic profi les of the key symbol and recurrent collocations as well as the standard phrases invoking the identified central notion. The divergent views on the operation of the economy presented by two distinctive groups of discourse participants: advocates and critics of capitalism provide an important interpretative framework determining the diverse profiling of the category “work” in the online debate. The controversy of the notion manifests itself also in the fact that the two contradictory cognitive models built around it are composed not only of the axioms accepted by a given group but also of the ones it ascribes to their opponents.
EN
The subject of the article is the problem of describing the meaning of a word as a symbolic entity that is considered in the context of the requirements of modern lexicography. The analysis of the selected family words in terms of the cognitive, narrative and discursive aspects are intended to release the role of words as “node access” to the conceptual framework in accordance with the cognitive approach to semantics. The author also considers which model of the definition could best reflect the appropriate aspects of the word. The results of the contextual analysis included in the discursive frame enrich the cognitive dimension of the definition of the linguistic category. They reveal the existential experience of people, their perception and evaluation, that is, different domains interact in the conceptualization, which lies not so much in a single word, but in its discursive relationships with others
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.