Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper presents brief history of the issue referred to in the title. Attention is drawn to the variety of formats and areas of cooperation between Polish and Belarusian local authorities, taking into account also the legal aspects of bilateral and multilateral cooperation. Comparative characteristics of the functioning of local self-governance systems in Belarus and Poland are discussed, with the focus on such issues as the context of systemic change, the specifics of the legal framework of both countries, international cooperation with third countries and organizations, as well as the motivation of the cooperating parties; special attention is paid to the consideration of successes and fallacies in the existing experience. The main part of the paper presents an analysis of the current Polish-Belarusian cooperation at the level of local governments. Principal external factors influencing the activation of bilateral relations are considered in detail: the place of Russia and the Eurasian Union in ongoing re-orientation of Belarus; Polish- Belarusian relations and the European Union; crisis in Polish-Russian relations; the Ukrainian dimension. With regard to internal factors ifluencing the Polish-Belarusian cooperation at the level of local self-government, the following issues are considered: state policies; legal issues; the level of democratic freedoms and independence in decision-making; ' nancial and economic problems; cultural, and informational components; personal dimension. In the final part of the paper the importance of the new realities is highlighted, and prospects of cooperation of local governments in Poland and Belarus are summarized; latest developments and the new trends in the area of cooperation are outlined, and the prospects of new possible areas of cooperation, and the supportive policies on the part of both the respective states as well as of international organizations are suggested.
EN
The paper attempts to draw attention to the problem related to ensuring protection of the rights and freedoms of victims of armed conflicts in the post-Soviet space. To date this research problem is rather modestly represented in the Polish political science publications. Membership in the Council of Europe of six post-Soviet states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine) at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries provided an opportunity for the citizens as well as temporary residents of these countries, to fully exercise their right to legal personality. Due to lack of effective national legal instruments which make it possible to seek compensation from the state for violating personal rights and freedoms, victims of armed conflicts in the post-Soviet space widely use the possibility of individual claims against the state in the European Court of Human Rights. Despite the fact that the ECHR is not considered competent in the issues of war crimes and crimes against humanity, it acts based on its competence related to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. The lack of interest of post-Soviet states in cooperation with the International Criminal Court is one of the reasons why in the coming years the European Court of Human Rights will remain the only international judicial institution with a potential of improving the condition of victims of armed conflicts in the region.
EN
The paper attempts to draw attention to the problem related to ensuring protection of the rights and freedoms of victims of armed conflicts in the post-Soviet space. To date this research problem is rather modestly represented in the Polish political science publications. Membership in the Council of Europe of six post-Soviet states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Russia, Ukraine) at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries provided an opportunity for the citizens as well as temporary residents of these countries, to fully exercise their right to legal personality. Due to lack of effective national legal instruments which make it possible to seek compensation from the state for violating personal rights and freedoms, victims of armed conflicts in the post-Soviet space widely use the possibility of individual claims against the state in the European Court of Human Rights. Despite the fact that the ECHR is not considered competent in the issues of war crimes and crimes against humanity, it acts based on its competence related to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. The lack of interest of post-Soviet states in cooperation with the International Criminal Court is one of the reasons why in the coming years the European Court of Human Rights will remain the only inter national judicial institution with a potential of improving the condition of victims of armed conflicts in the region.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.