Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

3 Studia Iuridica

3 Świątczak K.

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Glosa częściowo krytyczna do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 marca 2017 r. (III CZP 110/16)

100%

Świątczak K.

Studia Iuridica

2021

tom 89

332-344

The Supreme Court in the judgment of 17 March 2017, Ref. No. III CZP 110/16, ruled that it is permissible to enter into an agreement to renounce a legal portion in Polish civil law. Until now, it was unacceptable. The Supreme Court ruled that since the inheritance can be renounced, all the more so a legal portion can be renounced. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the above resolution of the Supreme Court. The author intends to compare the judgment of the Supreme Court with the views of the representatives of the doctrine of Polish judicial law and the previous case-law.

Glosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 24 maja 2019 r., I CSK 218/18

100%

Świątczak K.

Studia Iuridica

2022

tom 94

378-390

The Supreme Court in its judgment of 24 May 2019, I CSK 218/18, ruled that the purpose of increase in a lump sum remuneration under Article 632 § 2 of the Polish Civil Code is only to reduce the loss. The purpose of increasing the lump sum remuneration is not to compensate for the entire imminent loss. Such increase should cover that part of the loss which exceeds the normal contractual risk. The aim of this paper is to comment on the above judgment of the Supreme Court. The author compares the Supreme Court judgment with the views of legal scholars and commentators on the Polish judicial law, and with the previous case law.

Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 16 listopada 2017 r., V CSK 81/17

100%

Świątczak K.

Studia Iuridica

2021

tom 88

413-424

In the judgment of November 16, 2017, Ref. V. CSK 81/17, the Supreme Court ruled that starting a business in the form of running a go-go club in the commune does not violate its good name, even if some activities in its activity are contrary to the law. In addition, there are no grounds to distinguish the personal interest of a legal person in the form of a credible image. The purpose of this opinion is to evaluate the above resolution of the Supreme Court. The author intends to compare the judgment of the Supreme Court with the views of representatives of the doctrine of Polish judicial law and previous case-law.