Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Problematika jmenování a postavení biskupů německé národnosti v českých diecézích pohledem Svatého stolce

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2014

|

tom 3

133-147

EN

An the time of the Habsburg Monarchy, the government in Vienna had a preference for candidates of German nationality for the Archbishop‘s sees. The situation changed significantly after the year 1918. It was acknowledged by the Holy See that believers of German origin had become a minority in Czech dioceses. They were not an insignificant minority, however, and consequently the Holy See continued to appoint German bishops as well. There was a German suffragan bishop in Prague, and a residential bishop of German nationality in the Diocese of Litomerice. In both cases, acceptance on the part of Czech believers (and government) was an important aspect in the process of choosing the German bishop. While in the Prague archdiocese, it proved appropriate to appoint a German auxiliary bishop (Remiger) for specifically the German believers, in Litoměřice, the appointed German bishop Weber demonstrated that due to his popularity and language skills, the issue of appointing an Auxiliary Bishop of Czech nationality was irrelevant.

2

JEDNÁNÍ O OBSAZENÍ ARCIBISKUPSKÉHO STOLCE V OLOMOUCI PO REZIGNACI ARCIBISKUPA LVA KARDINÁLA SKRBENSKÉHO Z HŘÍŠTĚ Z POHLEDU SVATÉHO STOLCE

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2013

|

tom 15

|

nr 3

129–149

EN

In December 1919 Archbishop Leo Cardinal Skrbenský of Hříště sent his resignation to the Holy See, with this having been justified due to his health problems. Pope Benedict XV accepted his resignation. The question of Skrbenský’s successor had to be resolved. The first question was a clarification of how the successor would be designated, whether elected by the Chapter or appointed by the Holy See. With regard to the voluntary resignation of Skrbenský submitted to the Pope, it was preceded by the appointment by the Holy See. Canon Stojan emerged as the most suitable candidate and was consequently appointed Archbishop of Olomouc. Stojan enjoyed great popularity among the clergy and people of both nations and was also acceptable for the government.

3

STUDIUM OLOMOUCKÝCH KLERIKŮ V ŘÍMĚ NA PAPEŽSKÉ KOLEJI NEPOMUCENUM V PRVNÍ POLOVINĚ 20. STOLETÍ

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2012

|

tom 14

|

nr 4

62–87

EN

Prior to World War I, Clerics from Moravia studied in Rome at the Collegium Germanicum or at the S. Maria dell‘Anima, while clerics from Bohemia studied at the Bohemicum. After the establishment of an independent Czechoslovakia, the archbishops of Olomouc wanted to continue to send students to Rome. With regard to the establishment of an independent Czechoslovakia, they began to consider establishing a common Czechoslovak college. First, it was important to resolve the issue of financial backing not only for the construction work but also for the operations of the college. Gradually, the number stabilized at 5–6 students, who also remained there during World War II. The normal situation came to an end, however, after the year 1948, with the beginning of the communist totalitarian regime in Czechoslovakia, when free contact (not only) with Rome terminated.

4

OBSAZOVÁNÍ BISKUPSKÝCH STOLCŮ V HABSBURSKÉ MONARCHII NA PŘELOMU 19. A 20. STOL. NA PŘÍKLADU OLOMOUCKÉHO ARCIBISKUPSTVÍ PO REZIGNACI ARCIBISKUPA KOHNA

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2012

|

tom 14

|

nr 1

40–64

EN

Representatives of secular power were always interested in retaining control over the occupation of the Episcopal See. This was also true in the Habsburg monarchy, where the bishops were appointed by the Emperor and the Pope had to either confirm or not confirm the candidate proposed by the Emperor. The Archdiocese of Olomouc was a special case. The chapter of Olomouc had the privilege of free election of the Archbishops, who were either elected from the canons of the chapter or the canons postulated another candidate. During the last truly free election, Archbishop Theodor Kohn was elected. His episcopate was not particularly successful and he had to resign (1904). During the negotiations concerning his resignation, The Holy See and government in Vienna began to look for a suitable candidate for the vacant see. Both sides agreed on Bishop Bauer, who was consequently appointed archbishop of Olomouc. After the death of Archbishop Bauer (died 1915), the Archbishop of Prague Skrbenský was postulated to the post of Archbishop of Olomouc.

5

„KOHNŮV PUCFLEK“: VZTAH JOSEFA SVATOPLUKA MACHARA A OLOMOUCKÉHO ARCIBISKUPA THEODORA KOHNA

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2011

|

tom 13

|

nr 3

42-59

EN

In 1903, a number of articles were published which criticized Archbishop Kohn. One exception appeared, however, when Josef Svatopluk Machar criticized his opponents. Theodor Kohn resigned in Rome in 1904 and then settled in Ehrenhausen (Steiermark). J. S. Machar visited Kohn in Ehrenhausen in 1909. This visit did not remain unnoticed and aroused the interest of the Archdiocese of Olomouc and of the Holy See in Rome. Machar promised to publish nothing about this visit and about Kohn, “except from the perspective of history”. He released his reminiscences of Kohn in 1927.

6

The Ways of Punishing Clerics. Episcopal Detentions for Priests – a Case Study of Olomouc Archdiocese in the 19th Century

100%

Jonová J.

Kościół i Prawo

|

2017

|

nr 6 (19) nr 1

209-225

EN

The institution of the house of correction for the clergy (also called “priestly prisons”) represented a special institution for priests who were guilty of violating their duty or manners, but also for priests who were ill (physically or psychologically). The priest who was considered to be reformed (corrected) could be released back into pastoral service. Priests located in clerical prisons were not “dangerous criminals”, but rather offenders. The house of correction in Mírov had its own rules: instructions for the dean of Mohelnice (with the duty of visitation), for the chaplain of Mírov (the superior of the house of correction in Mírov), service staff and for the incarcerated priests, of course. These instructions represented very well thought-out regulations. Based on these, we can also picture the functioning of this institution, and outline the fates of the incarcerated priests (depending upon the preserved archival sources).

PL

Instytucja domu „korekcyjnego” dla duchowieństwa (zwanego również „więzieniami kapłańskimi”) stanowiła szczególną instytucję dla kapłanów, którzy byli winni naruszenia ich obowiązków i sposobów postępowania, ale także dla kapłanów chorych (fizycznie lub psychicznie). Kapłan, który został uznany za zreformowanego (poprawionego), mógł zostać zwolniony z powrotem do służby duszpasterskiej. Kapłani znajdujący się w kleryckich więzieniach nie byli „niebezpiecznymi kryminalistami”, ale raczej przestępcami. Dom „korekcyjny” w Mírov miał własne reguły: instrukcje dla dziekana w mieście Mohelnice (z obowiązkiem wizytacji), dla kapłana Mírova (przełożonego domu korekcyjnego w Mírov), personelu obsługi i dla więzionych kapłanów. Te instrukcje przedstawiają bardzo dobrze przemyślane przepisy. Opierając się na nich, można wyobrazić sobie funkcjonowanie tej instytucji i przedstawić losy więzionych kapłanów (w zależności od zachowanych źródeł archiwalnych).

7

Působení biskupa Stanislava Zely v Arcidiecézní památkové radě

100%

Jonová J.

Studia theologica

|

2015

|

tom 2

240-249

EN

The Archdiocesan Heritage Council in Olomouc, whose task was to ensure the protection of existing monuments and supervise their suitable renovation, was established in 1914. It was also responsible for the construction of new buildings with a focus on the quality of religious art. Auxiliary Bishop Zela was appointed chairman of the Archdiocesan Heritage Council in 1941. Zela was only chairman for three years but managed to make it functional. Since some members of the Archdiocesan Heritage Council had died, Zela appointed new members and called a meeting of the Council which had not met for a long time. He reminded the committee of the tasks of the Council and the consolidated Council managed to carry out its duties successfully despite wartime adversity.