Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

3 Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu

3 Marko V.

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

SOME SKETCHY NOTES ON THE REAPER ARGUMENT

100%

Marko V.

Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu

2012

tom 19

nr 3

361 – 387

The paper deals with the possible readings of The Reaper Argument premises. Some conjectures related to the Stoics’ alleged proof of the argument are discussed.

LOOKING FOR LAZY ARGUMENT CANDIDATES

100%

Marko V.

Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu

2011

tom 18

nr 4

447 – 474

The Lazy Argument, as it is preserved in historical testimonies, is not logically conclusive. In this form, it appears to have been proposed in favour of part-time fatalism (including past time fatalism). The argument assumes that free will assumption is unacceptable from the standpoint of the logical fatalist but plausible for some of the non-universal or part-time fatalists. There are indications that the layout of argument is not genuine, but taken over from a Megarian source and later transformed. The genuine form of the argument seems to be given in different form and far closer to logical fatalism and its purpose is not to defend laziness. If the historical argument has to lead to a logically satisfactory solution, some additional assumptions and additional tuning is needed.

LOOKING FOR LAZY ARGUMENT CANDIDATES

100%

Marko V.

Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu

2011

tom 18

nr 3

363 – 383

The Lazy Argument, as it is preserved on historical testimonies, is not logically conclusive. In this form, it appears to have been proposed in favour of part-time fatalism (including past time fatalism). The argument assumes that free will assumption is unacceptable from the standpoint of the logical fatalists but plausible for some of the non-universal of part-time fatalists. There are indications that the layout of argument is not genuine, but taken over from a Megarian source and later transformed. The genuine form of the argument seems to be given in different form and far closer to logical fatalism and whose purpose is not to defend laziness. If the historical argument has to lead to the logically satisfactory solution, some additional assumptions and its additional tuning are needed.