Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 11

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author presents questions related to the change in the legal regulations concerning selected precautionary measures. She emphasizes the inconsistencies relating to changes in the scope of precautionary measures, especially addiction treatment. The author basically welcomes the changes resulting from the amendment of 20 February 2015, but considering the need to change specific normative solutions concerning addiction therapy.
EN
The author presents doubts concerning interpretation of numerous legal grounds for remedying damage caused by an offence in the field of criminal law, including imposition of an obligation to remedy damage in connection with early release on licence. Emphasis is placed on problems with their application in judicial practice. The author in principle views the amendments in the scope of compensatory measures as positive, however, she considers the possibility of further amendments, which would lead to more rational legislative solutions.
EN
Obligation of remedying harm appears in the Penal Code in two different forms; as an unaided penal measure and as a probative measure associated with the institution of conditional extinction/redemption of criminal proceedings, conditional suspension of execution of the sentence, restriction of liberty. This article contains an assessment of legal regulations concerning probative remedying of harm resulting from crime. After discussing the presumptions of remedying ruling as a probative measure, the author shows the selected aspects concerning the ruling issues. She introduces a separate place for this measure in the system of legal and penal reaction to crime. The article also attempts to answer the question: What is the actual function of probative remedying of harm resulting from crime?
4
Content available remote Uwagi na temat kierunku zmian prawa karnego materialnego w latach 2015–2019
100%
PL
Autorka opracowania prezentuje zasadnicze założenia reformatorskie przeprowadzone w ramach kodyfikacji karnej z 1997 roku. Odnosi się do najbardziej rozległych nowelizacji kodeksu karnego, które weszły w życie z dniem 1 lipca 2015 roku oraz do zmian przewidzianych w ustawie z dnia 13 czerwca 2019 roku, skierowanej przez Prezydenta RP w dniu 28 czerwca 2019 roku do Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. W toku rozważań autorka odwołuje się do najczęściej dyskutowanych regulacji, które wskazują na kształtowanie się nowej filozofii karania. Poważne zastrzeżenia, jej zdaniem, budzi kierunek dokonanych zmian, które istotnie zwiększają punitywność systemu karnego, wytyczają kierunek polityki karnej zmierzający do wyraźnego zaostrzenia represji karnej. Autorka akcentuje niespójność systemowych rozwiązań, podaje w wątpliwość ich zasadność i wyraża dezaprobatę dla przyjętej ostatnio strategii rozwoju prawa karnego.
EN
The author of the study presents the main assumptions carried out under the penal codification of 1997. She refers to the most extensive amendments of the Penal Code that entered into force on 1st July 2015 and also to the amendments provided for in the Act of 13th June 2019, that were referred by the President of the Republic of Poland to the Constitutional Tribunal on 28th June 2019. In the course of considerations, the author refers to the most frequently discussed regulations, that point out the formation of a new philosophy of punishment. She has reservations about the direction of the changes that significantly increase the range of punitive measures of the penal system and set the direction of penal policy aimed at a distinct tightening of criminal repression. The author emphasises the inconsistency of system solutions, casts doubt on their legitimacy and expresses disapproval regarding the recently adopted strategy for the development of penal law.
|
2016
|
tom 42
65-75
EN
The author presents questions related to the change of legal regulations concerning the selected criminal and security measures. She emphasizes inconsistencies relating to changes in the scope of the obligation to compensate damages, exemplary, forfeiture, protective measures, including addiction treatment. The author welcomes the changes resulting from the amendment of 20th February 2015, but considering the possibility of further changes that lead to more rational normative solutions.
EN
The article contains an assessment of ex-officio remedy in the Polish criminal trial. The author, after discussing the nature and presumptions concerning ex-officio remedy, shows doubts of interpretation arose in the background. She also makes an attempt to answer the question whether ex-officio remedy should be removed from the Code of Criminal Procedure, or remain in its present form.
EN
The author analyses the changes in terms of penal measures of a pecuniary character, including obligation of remedy, punitive damages, cash benefits. She evaluates the trend of changes as well as their usefulness in practice. In the article she also considers the competitiveness of those measures and relates it to the possibility of their joint ruling.
EN
The authors discuss some doubts of the interpretative nature, resulting from the plurality of legal grounds of redressing damages caused by crime in the area of criminal law. They emphasize difficulties that exist in their functioning in the judicial practice. The authors approve of the changes resulting from the amendment of the Code of 20 February 2015; however, they are considering a possibility of further adjustments, which will lead to more rational normative solutions.
|
|
tom 78
|
nr 2
137-149
EN
So called possession of minor amounts of illegal substances, a new institution referred to in Article 62a of the Act on Preventing Drug Addiction has been analysed. This regulation provides for a possibility of discontinuing the proceedings against offenders charged with possession of drugs in small amounts. Discussing the normative structure of the offence, the authors indicated areas that are defective and require urgent intervention of the legislature.
PL
Autorki, na tle rozwoju rozwiązań prawnych stosowanych wobec sprawców przestępstw "drobnego posiadania" substancji zabronionych, dokonały obszernej analizy nowej instytucji z art. 62a u.p.n. Regulacja ta zakłada możliwość umorzenia postępowania wobec wspomnianej kategorii sprawców. Omawiając tę konstrukcję normatywną, autorki wskazały jednocześnie obszary, które są wadliwe i stąd wymagają pilnej interwencji ustawodawcy.
EN
This article is devoted to the issue of criminal liability for the crime of attempt against one’s life by the aggrieved as an aggravated type of stalking. It is related to validity of penalisation of this type of behaviour. It was pointed to interpretative doubts concerning appearances of a crime, as well as joining a discussion about bittiness within the scope of regularising the penal sanction.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.