Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 14

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Draft Regulation of the Council of Ministers establishes the principles of the application by Poland of the possibility of rescheduling payment of the levies provided for in Regulation No 595/2004. In accordance with § 4 of the draft regulation of the Council of Ministers aid provided for therein has the character of de minimis aid, and should be provided in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 1408/2013. This draft regulation does not go beyond the legal framework determined by Regulation 595/2004 in relation to the preamble to the Regulation 2015/517. Consequently, it must be considered not to be inconsistent with Commission Regulation (EC) No 595/2004
EN
In the author’s opinion, the Bill concerns issues partially regulated by the EU law and interferes with the freedom of establishment and the freedom of services guaranteed by the treaties. This does not constitute a breach of the EU law, but the introduced restrictions do not have a proper justification in terms of their proportionality to the intended purpose of the regulation. An argument that similar legal solutions are in force in other Member States was not recognized to be such a justification. According to the author, although the changes contained in the Bill may serve the overriding general interest, that is animal well-being, the compliance of the provisions with the EU law may be challenged. In the remaining scope, the Bill is compliant with the EU law, with an exception of the amendments to the Act on Animal Protection that ban slaughter without stunning in an abattoir or a slaughterhouse.
EN
Article 138 of the Bill entrusts Poczta Polska SA with exclusive rights for the provision of a registered electronic delivery service and a public hybrid service. In the author’s opinion, this constitutes a restriction of the freedom to provide services and the freedom of establishment as defined in the TFEU. Determining whether granting public aid to Poczta Polska requires notification to the European Commission according to Article 108(3) TFEU is not possible on the basis of the Bill itself, which does not constitute an aid program, and depends on the contents of executive acts. Entrusting the operator’s duties in the manner provided for in the Bill will require notification to the European Commission.
EN
In the author’s opinion, doubts can be raised as to compliance of the provisions concerning the prohibition of sale of stock and shares by public entities below the threshold of 51% of the issued capital of the company and the ban on the payment of dividends in the light of the principles of freedom of establishment and free movement of capital, due to the absence of proof that the purpose of these regulations is the public interest and the failure to demonstrate that obedience of the principle of proportionality. To the extent that it prohibits the disposal of stock and shares by public entities and to the extent that it prohibits the payment of dividends, the bill in question may be regarded as contrary to EU law
EN
The provisions of the bill will be applied only, if the United Kingdom leaves the European Union on the basis of the agreement referred to in Article 50(2) TEU. Until the day of completion of the author’s opinion, internal procedures concerning the approval of the Agreement have not been completed in the United Kingdom. At present, it is not yet clear, whether the United Kingdom would leave the EU on the basis of an agreement as referred to in Article 50(2) TEU or without such agreement.
EN
Article 12a (1) of the Act on the Agricultural Market Agency and Organization of Certain Agricultural Markets may provide a basis of the relevant regulation on granting aid under the de minimis conditions since it would be implementation of the provisions of Regulation 595/2004. You cannot unequivocally determine whether this provision could also serve as a legal basis for the Regulation making it possible to grant public aid under different conditions, as detailed assumptions regarding such assistance are unknown.
EN
The opinion points out that the rules and procedures of Sejm’s international cooperation, especially contacts within the European Union, must be regulated by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Currently, both EU law and national law allow the Sejm to cooperate with the European Parliament on impact assessment of European Union legislation, involving the transfer to the European Parliament of the possessed materials relating to the exercise of EU law. It is advisable to regulate the cooperation on the basis of Article 9 of the Protocol (No. 1) and – prior to the adoption of the said regulation – the cooperation should be based on the structure of COSAC.
EN
The Author claims that the state monopoly in the field of some sorts of gambling as well as obligation to organize certain sorts of gambling only in casinos are restrictions on the freedoms of the internal market (freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services). Referring to the applicable case-law of the Court of Justice, the Author underlines that such solution is justified by an over-riding reason relating to the public interest. Moreover the relevant provisions of law are appropriate and proportionate to the intended object. They are not applied in a discriminatory manner. Due to that, the bill is compliant with the European Union law.
EN
The paper addresses the concept of the so-called Eurobonds. A concept, which will place emphasis on the financial stability of sovereign debt market, facilitating access of member countries of the euro area to money lending, and reducing the cost of raising money. The Green Paper addresses matters which – depending on the finally adopted solution – may be contrary to the current wording of Article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
EN
This opinion evaluates four Deputies’ bill as to whether or not they are in conformity with three new EU directives on public procurement. The presented analysis confirms the compliance with EU law of a Deputies’ bill included contained in Sejm Paper No. 1076 and welcomes the extension of the catalog of evaluation criteria to include the criterion of innovative character of proposed solutions. The authors find the bill contained in Sejm Paper No. 1226 to be incompatible with EU law, because contrary to EU law it presupposes the primacy of the criterion of the lowest prices over other criteria. The bill included in Sejm Papers No. 1335 and No. 1635 are found partially incompatible with EU law, due to the lack of objectively justified reasons for division of public procurement into those representing functional and technical unity, as well as a violation of the principle of equal treatment and transparency.
EN
The European Union Law provides the possibility of financing public media from the State budget, although it has to be consistent with the principles of state-aid, defined in the European Union law. In most cases state assistance requires notification to the European Commission. Providing funds with the omission of that rules results in an obligation to refund of the assistance provided.
EN
The proposal introduces the institutional separation of the infrastructure manager from transport operations. The authors contest the universal model of railways and suggest an increased level of funding for railway infrastructure. They question the compliance of the proposed directive with the principle of subsidiarity and opt for the achievement of its objectives by other actions taken at national level. The authors agree that the adoption of the proposal would lead to a far‑reaching interference in the organization and management of the railways, and that its results may differ from country to country. They are critical to the proposed directive and conclude that its adoption may require amendments to several pieces of legislation, the standards it introduces are premature, and can have unpredictable legal and socio‑economic consequences.
EN
The proposed amendment of the Directive 2006/112/EC is a part of the construction of the target value added tax system concerning trade between EU Member States. It contains two types of provisions: firstly - outlining the final (target) VAT system, and secondly - bringing current solutions to the target model.
EN
The authors of the opinion comprehensively discuss the agreement concluded by the European Union, European Atomic Energy Community and the United Kingdom on the terms of trade and cooperation after Brexit and the agreement concluded between the European Union and the United Kingdom concerning security procedures for exchanging and protecting classified information. They present the provisions of individual parts of the agreements, regulating the issues of trade, fisheries, coordination of social systems, customs, visas, law enforcement cooperation and cybersecurity. They assess the impact of the implementation of the agreements. The authors positively assess the wide range of regulations. In their opinion they will reduce the negative effects of Brexit. However they identify some of their shortcomings that need to be removed.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.