Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

La souveraineté ou les souverainetés ? Réflexions sur les relations entre souveraineté de l’État et souveraineté de la nation

100%

Chęciński R. , Departout A. , Mądry T.

Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

|

2013

|

tom 2

235-245

PL

The study attempts an analysis of the relationship between the concepts of state and nation sovereignty. The thesis has been proposed that state sovereignty could be regarded as a derivation of nation sovereignty. While attempting to approve of the proposed thesis, the authors describe the relationship between both institutions by referring to their origins. In the light of concepts of sovereignty, the relationship between state and international law is presented from a philosophical perspective. Approving the proposed thesis, the authors conclude that regardless of whether state sovereignty derives from nation sovereignty or not, the two concepts refer to different backgrounds which can be seen both in their origins and contemporary realities.

2

Ogólnopolska Konferencja Naukowa XXIII Zjazd Katedr Teorii i Filozofii Prawa „Państwo — Społeczeństwo — Kultura: formalne i nieformalne źródła prawa”, Lublin, 23–26 września 2018 r.

94%

Potrzeszcz J.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2019

|

nr 2(151)

215–217

EN

The report refers to the All-Poland Scientific Conference held on 23–26 September 2018, organized by the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law at the Faculty of Law, Canon Law and Administration of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin — the 23rd Meeting of the Departments of Theory of Philosophy of Law “State — Society — Culture: Formal and Informal Sources of Law”. The conference dealt with the problems of the sources of law and lawmaking, significant due to the scale of activity of lawmaking, the scope of juridization of social life and dynamic socio-cultural transformations.

3

Human rights and the law of human rights: a positive legal regulation of an ontic reality

94%

Nagel K.

Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

|

2014

|

tom 3

213-227

PL

The author introduces a fundamental distinction between human rights and the law of human rights which is subsequent to these rights. While examining these issues, the author follows M. Piechowiak and his way of understanding human rights. According to Piechowiak, human rights are objectively existing relationships between a human being and a global good, welfare that is due to him/her. Particular aspects of this global good are what we used to call an object of a particular human right. Therefore, human rights have an ontic nature. These relationships have their normative consequences. It may be stated that these relationships ontologically justify that the norms protecting these rights (actually these relationships) stay in force. These relationships and the norms protecting them can be recognized. Notwithstanding what was stated above, human rights shall be proclaimed and the ontic norms protecting them, adequately recognized, shall be positivised, that is, acts of positive law shall introduce these norms into legal systems.

4

Implikowana niezmienialność konstytucji a Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej

83%

Bogucki O.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2024

|

nr 1–2(180–181)

13-32

EN

The study is devoted to the issue of the implied limit of amendments to the Polish Constitution. The article contains an analysis of the most important arguments that are or may be raised, in the discussion on the implicit unconstitutionality of amendments to the Polish basic law. The study indicates that two types of arguments may be raised in the considerations on the recognition of the implied limit of amendments: on the one hand, strictly related to the specificity of the Polish constitutional order, and on the other hand, universal – drawing on the achievements of the world constitutionalism and referring to the concept of the constitution and identity of the constituent power. To justify the existence of the implied limitations of amendments, the latter, and in particular the reference to temporal axiological coherence, are crucial. This argument has not been clearly formulated by the supporters of the implied limit of amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, but it seems to be a necessary element of a convincing justification for its existence. The article formulates the thesis that, taking into consideration and weighing various types of arguments, the existence of an implied limit of amendments to the Polish Constitution should be recognised. Such recognition requires the rejection of a strong understanding of sovereignty and constituent power and conceiving them as certain types of constructions limited by their own identity.

5

Filozofi a (teoria) prawa Carla Schmitta?

83%

Zajadło J.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2016

|

nr 4(135)

65-94

EN

The main aim of this article is to analyze the small work of Carl Schmitt “On the three types of juristic thought”, fi rst published in 1934. In the literature of the subject, the German scholar is known primarily as a political philosopher and creator of the original, although controversial, ideas and concepts, including: the nomos, the political, the friend and enemy relationship, a state of emergency, sovereignty and political theology. Not forgotten is also the support Schmitt gave the Nazi regime after Hitler came to power. In the fi rst two parts of the article, the author reviews, on the one hand, the current state of research on the thought of the German scholar and, on the other hand, presents his short biography and his achievements as a writer. All of this, however, is only the background for a general review and analysis of the origins and content of the work of Schmitt of 1934. The author emphasizes the unique character of that small volume book as compared to other works of the German scholar. In the book, Schmitt rather appears to us as a theorist and philosopher of law, who goes beyond a dispute between legal positivism and natural law, and proposes a particular mode of thinking based on legal institutions. His sources of inspiration include two of his contemporary authors, representing institutional theory of law, Maurice Harriou and Santi Romano. According to the author of the article, it is hard to claim on this basis that Schmitt developed his own theory and philosophy of law.

6

On the purpose and functions of legal‑dogmatic research (continental tradition)

83%

Vachev V.

Studia Iuridica

|

2023

|

tom 100

289-299

EN

The present text discusses the role of a special kind of research into criminal law in the continental legal tradition, for which the term “legal-dogmatic research” has been adopted and used by many scholars from outside the common law system and which is described in more detail below, its place among other scholarly disciplines, and its significance for legal practice. The concept of this “legal-dogmatic research” can be understood in two ways. Based on the first approach, it is perceived as an abstract study of law independent on the legal rules in force at a given time and place. In this sense, it appears as synonymous to terms used in the German language: Doktrin or Lehre (study). In the second sense, this research is seen as a study of existing law (lex lata) – and nothing else. It differs from other areas of jurisprudence in that it does not strive to be universally valid, but is confined to a time and place. The article presents a point of view in the light of which this research aims to render the normative system coherent and comprehensible, i.e. to establish the correct meaning of the law by clarifying and systematizing it. In this context, the author shows that the purpose of legal scholarship is to reveal and subsequently to conceptualize reality. At the same time, the importance of investigation of the law as it is (legal-dogmatic research) is by no means limited to the hermeneutical analysis of the legal text, but that it faces equally ambitious tasks, such as the development of criminal law and the need to find material legitimacy for the use of coercion by the state against citizens.

7

Dilemmas of Justice in Law – the Historical-Legal and Semantic Aspects of Justice

71%

Kokoszkiewicz A. , Tokarski T.

Teka Komisji Prawniczej

|

2024

|

tom 17

|

nr 1

123-135

EN

The article focuses on the dilemmas of justice in law, and especially on linguistic (semantic) and legal-historical issues. This study is part of a broader research project devoted to the study of justice in law – in particular, its understanding, formation and impact, as well as its possible use today (e.g. in legislation). Due to the complexity of the research problem examined, the article presents some introductory remarks and clarifies certain limitations. This is followed by the presentation of historical and legal considerations, and a series of linguistic and semantic considerations. These lead to particularly spectacular results, as it turns out that the concept and understanding of justice have shaped the concept and understanding of law.

8

Instytucja zgody dysponenta dobrem prawnym na przykładzie zabiegów ubezpładniających

59%

Kadyszewski B.

Roczniki Administracji i Prawa

|

2021

|

tom 3

|

nr XXI

87-97

EN

The article is an analysis from the theoretical and dogmatic point of view of the institution of consent which both in Polish and foreign criminal law doctrine, constitutes the axis of a significant dispute concerning both specific issues, such as the scope of legal goods that an individual can freely dispose of and issues of a more general nature, such as the dogmatic structure of crime. The author referring to the example of incapacitating procedures such as vasectomy or laparoscopy exposes the most important problems of a dogmatic as well as theoretical nature related to the title issue. At the same time author presents his own position on placing the consent in the dogmatic structure of a crime and also takes the floor on the sometimes raised issue of introducing the institution of consent into the penal code.

PL

Artykuł stanowi analizę z punktu widzenia teoretycznoprawnego oraz dogmatycznego instytucji zgody dysponenta dobrem prawnym, która to zarówno w polskiej, jak i zagranicznej doktrynie prawa karnego stanowi oś istotnego sporu dotyczącego zarówno szczegółowych kwestii, takich jak między innymi zakres dóbr prawnych, którymi to jednostka może swobodnie dysponować, jak i zagadnień natury bardziej ogólnych jak dogmatyczna struktura przestępstwa. Autor, odwołując się do przykładu zabiegów ubezpładniających, takich jak wazektomia czy laparoskopia, eksponuje najważniejsze problemy natury dogmatycznej i teoretycznoprawnej związanej z tytułowym zagadnieniem. Jednocześnie, odwołując się do teorii znamion negatywnych, autor przedstawia własne stanowisko w przedmiocie umiejscawiania zgody dysponenta dobrem prawnym w dogmatycznej strukturze przestępstwa, a także zabiera głos w podnoszonej niekiedy kwestii wprowadzenia instytucji zgody dysponenta dobrem prawnym do kodeksu karnego

9

Sprawiedliwość jako wartość we współczesnym państwie i prawie

59%

Kokoszkiewicz A.

Prawo i Polityka

|

2019

|

nr 9

14-22

EN

The article focuses on justice understood as value in modern state and law. It is accompanied by a research question whether justice is a certain value, a principle that is inalienable and universal, which should accompany modern state and law, if we want to call it the rule of law. First of all, the historical faces of justice in the state and law were presented. In this part of the article, the author presents selected examples of considerations on justice in the broad sense, which took place at the turn of history, and which still remain - even partially timely. Secondly, the article presents considerations focused around the concept of “Iustitia fundamentum regnorum – Justice is the mainstay of the state.” The author presents in it reflections on the state and law, positive and natural law as well as the role of justice. also characterizes its essence. Finally, conclusions are presented.

10

Justice Dilemmas in Law: on the Sense of Analysing Biblical Texts in Modern Jurisprudence

48%

Kokoszkiewicz A.

Roczniki Nauk Prawnych

|

2023

|

tom 33

|

nr 3

7-21

PL

Artykuł dotyczy problemów badawczych związanych z problematyką sprawiedliwości i prawa. Jest to temat stary jak świat, który z jednej strony zyskał obszerną literaturę, z drugiej jednak współcześnie jest jakby nieco zapomniany. Sprawiedliwość w prawie została odłożona na półkę z wartościami, które są oczywiste – są swego rodzaju dogmatem. Dzieje się to zupełnie niesłusznie, bowiem kiedy stawiamy pytania o to, co oznacza taka sprawiedliwość w prawie i na co wpływa, nie otrzymujemy prostych i zadowalających odpowiedzi. Staram się więc wykazać, że szerokie, wieloaspektowe podejście do tego tematu może okazać się wartościowe. W tym celu rozsądne i wartościowe wydaje się wykorzystanie wszelkich dostępnych badań i źródeł. Szczególnie interesujące mogą okazać się niektóre teksty biblijne, jak na przykład przypowieść o właścicielu winnicy, którą wybrałem do analizy, bowiem ujawnia wiele interesujących zagadnień. Są one nadal aktualne i dotyczą problemów stojących przed współczesnymi systemami prawnymi. Sądzę, że teksty te mogą być wartościowe dla rozwoju prawoznawstwa. Pozwalają także na integrację nauk o państwie i prawie; czy to o charakterze wewnętrznym (np. z dogmatyką prawniczą, pozwalającą na tworzenie sprawiedliwego prawa), czy zewnętrznym (z naukami innymi niż prawo). Tezą artykułu będzie stwierdzenie, że teksty biblijne, mimo że nie należą bezpośrednio do dziedziny nauk prawnych, posiadają cechy pozwalające na ich wykorzystanie we współczesnym prawoznawstwie. Wycinkiem badawczym i jedynym omawianym tutaj tekstem biblijnym będzie tekst ewangelisty Mateusza.

EN

This article deals with research problems related to justice and law. This is a perennial topic that has been widely discussed in literature but is somewhat forgotten today. Justice in law has been put aside along with values that are self-evident as a kind of dogma, which is utterly wrong. When we ask what such justice in law means, however, and what it affects, we do not get simple and satisfactory answers. Therefore I try to prove that a broad, multi-faceted approach can prove valuable. To this end, in my view, it is reasonable and valuable to use all available research and sources. Some biblical texts, such as the parable of the owner of a vineyard, which I have chosen for analysis, may prove particularly interesting. The parable reveals a great many interesting issues. They are still relevant today and deal with the problems faced by modern legal systems. I believe the texts can be beneficial for the development of jurisprudence. They also enable the integration of the science of state and law, either internally (e.g., with legal dogmatics, which permits the creation of just law) or externally (with sciences other than law). The claim here is that biblical texts, despite the fact that they do not belong directly with legal science, have qualities that enable their use in modern jurisprudence. The researched excerpt and the only biblical text discussed here will be that of Apostle Matthew.