Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Górnośląskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk im. Walentego Roździeńskiego w Katowicach

100%

Hojka Z.

|

2018

|

tom 27

|

nr 1(52)

97-115

EN

Genesis of the Society of Friends of Sciences of North Silesia goes back to the nineties of the 19th century, when in 1892 in Bytom the Literary Society of North Silesia was founded. On its basis, in 1920 the Society of Friends in Silesia was created with a seat in Katowice. It was headed in turn by: Dr. Brunon Kudera and Rev. Emil Szramek. The first years of the Society’s existence were characterised by certain stagnation, which changed thanks to participation of Rev. Emil Szramek, who was simultaneously editor-in-chief of the “Yearbooks of the Society of Friends of Sciences in Silesia”. He wrote about Silesian history, the history of the Catholic and Evangelical church, ethnography, painting, literature, music, economy, education, culture and prominent people. In 1932, the Society created “Fontes” publication. Another form of Society’s activity was organisation of scientifi c-popular lectures on both history and culture of Silesia, as well as the economy of Silesian province. The Society co-operated i.a. with the Jagiellonian University and Polska Akademia Umiejętności. When the war broke out, it was forced to discontinue its activities, Rev. Szramek was arrested and sent to Dachau concentration camp, where he was murdered in 1942. After the war, the Society was reactivated under the new name of Silesian-Dąbrowa Society of Friends of Sciences, which focused on shaping scientifi c life in the province, organising lectures and on editorial activity. In 1950, it was renamed once again into Silesian Scientifi c Society. The same year it was liquidated and on its basis a branch of Poznań Western Institute was set up. On the initiative of Wilhelm Szewczyk, Prof. Alojzy Melih and Jan Mitręga, in 1989 the Society was reactivated under the name The Walenty Roździeński Society of Friends of Sciences of North Silesia. Its purpose was to promote the scientific results of Silesian science and culture knowledge about Silesia, forecasting solutions in ecology, economy and technology in the region. Particular emphasis was put on commemorating important facts and persons in the history of Upper Silesia. Presidents of the Society at that time were in turn: Prof. Andrzej Brożek, Prof. Czesław Głombik, Prof. Józef Śliwiok, Dr. Jacek Kurek. The Society became involved in the action of commemorating well-known Silesians by way of giving their names to streets, institutions and schools. It organised symposiums and seminars accompanied by cultural events, mainly chamber concerts. In addition to promotion of Upper Silesia, current problems of the region were dealt with: pro-environmental activities, publishing activity within the Society’s university.Its editor-in-chief until 2013 was Prof. Józef Śliwiok. The Society was an honorary patron of numerous scientifi c and popular conferences. The Society co-operated with: the Polish Academy of Sciences in Katowice, Silesian University, Musical Academy in Katowice, Economic University in Katowice, Silesian Technical University, Silesian Medical University, Academy of Fine Arts in Katowice, Silesian Institute in Opole, Silesian Museum and Silesian Library. In order to favour outstanding people of Upper Silesia, on the initiative of Prof. Śliwiok the Society established the Laurels of the Walenty Roździeński Society of Friends of Sciences of the Upper Silesia.

2

The professionalisation of science – claim and refusal: discipline building and ideals of scientific autonomy in the growth of prehistoric archaeology. The case of georges laplace’s group of typologie analytique, 1950s–1990s

100%

Plutniak S.

|

tom 49

105-153

EN

The majority of analyses investigating the professionalisation of scientific domains tend to assume the linear and general features of this transformation. These studies focus on the shift from a non–professionalised state to a professionalised state. This dual approach, however, crucially lacks some other aspects of the process of profession- alisation. This issue is discussed within the context of the growth of prehistoric archaeology in France from the 1940s, by observing scientific societies, national research organisations and their social networks. Looking at the scale of Georges Laplace’s career and that of his research group, which studied the typo- logie analytique method, this article demonstrates the benefits of a ternary model which also encompasses the modes of refusal of professionalisation.

3

Społeczne tworzenie kryteriów demarkacyjnych między nauką i pseudonauką

84%

Krzemińska K.

Filozofia i Nauka

|

2021

|

tom 9

109-125

EN

In the paper I address the problem of consolidation of the borders of the world of science by scientific institutions-in this case, Polish scientific societies of various fields. Basing on the analysis of the statutes of selected societies, I formulate a list of research questions that concern the role of scientific societies in distinguishing be tween what is considered scientific and what is not. These questions can be used in a more in-depth research. I adopt a constructivist perspective, focus on the ways in which science is produced and separated from pseudoscience, and do not address the (in)accuracy of claims rejected by the scientific world.

PL

W poniższym tekście podejmuję problem umacniania granic świata nauki przez instytucje naukowe – w tym przypadku polskie towarzystwa naukowe różnych dyscyplin nauki. Na podstawie analizy treści statutów wybranych towarzystw chcę wypracować zestaw pytań badawczych dotyczących roli towarzystw naukowych w oddzielaniu tego, co uznawane jest za naukowe, od tego, co naukowe nie jest. Pytania te mogą zostać wykorzystane w bardziej pogłębionych badaniach. Przyjmuję perspektywę konstruktywistyczną, skupiam się na sposobach wytwarzania nauki i oddzielania jej od pseudonauki. Nie podejmuję kwestii (nie)poprawności odrzucanych przez świat nauki twierdzeń.

4

Attitudes of physiotherapy students towards the physiotherapist community and scientific societies associated with physiotherapy and rehabilitation

67%

Gotlib J. , Białoszewski D. , Cabak A. , Barczyk K. , Bugajski A. , Grzegorczyk J. , Kułak W. , Majcher P. , Nowotny-Czupryna O. , Płaszewski M. , Prokopowicz K. , Sierdziński J.

Physiotherapy

|

2010

|

tom 18

|

nr 2

63-71

PL

Cel pracy: celem pracy była analiza postrzegania postaw studentów fizjoterapii uczelni medycznych (PM), uczelni o profilu wychowanie fizyczne (PWF) oraz pozostałych uczelni (IP) wobec własnej grupy zawodowej oraz towarzystw naukowych związanych z fizjoterapią i rehabilitacją. Materiał i metody: badaniami objęto łącznie 593 studentóow 10 polskich uczelni: 4 PM, 2 PWF i 4 IP. Badania zostały przeprowadzone w marcu i kwietniu 2009 roku wśród studentów III roku. Udział w badaniu był dobrowolny. Narzędziem badawczym był anonimowy, autorski, kwestionariusz zawierający łącznie 88 pytań. Do analizy prezentowanych w niniejszej pracy wyników wybrano 5 pytań. Analiza statystyczna: test Kruskalla-Wallisa i test Chi-kwadrat (X2); p < 0,05, STATISTICA 8.0, licencja WUM. Wyniki: w badanej grupie dominowała opinia, że grupa zawodowa fizjoterapeutów w Polsce jest podzielona: 41% PM, 44% PWF i 39% IP (p = NS), jednakże duża grupa badanych nie miała na ten temat zdania: 41% PM, 40% PWF i 42% IP (p = NS). 25% badanej grupy studentów znało Polskie Towarzystwo Fizjoterapii jako organizację naukową zrzeszającą fizjoterapeutów: 33% PM, 35% PWF oraz 16% IP. Tylko 3% wszystkich studentóow potrafiło wymienić również Polskie Towarzystwo Rehabilitacji. Studenci PM i PWF istotnie częściej (p < 0,001) niż studenci IP znali towarzystwa naukowe. Najbardziej znanym czasopismem naukowym z dziedziny fizjoterapii i rehabilitacji była w badanej grupie studentóow Fizjoterapia Polska - 34% oraz Fizjoterapia 32%. Tylko 11% studentów znało tytuł: Postępy Rehabilitacji. Wniosek: organizacje zawodowe i naukowe zrzeszające fizjoterapeutów powinny podjąć działania promocyjne wśród studentóow, zachęcając tę grupę do czynnego udziału w swych pracach, co wpłynęłoby na ściślejszą integrację grupy zawodowej, która pozwoliłaby z kolei na skuteczniejszą walkę o własne interesy zawodowe.

EN

Aims: the aim of this paper was to analyse the attitudes of physiotherapy students of medical universities (PM), universities of physical education (PWF), and other university-level schools (IP) towards the professional community of physiotherapists. Ma terial and methods: the study enrolled a total of 593 students of 10 Polish universities (4 PM, 2 PWF and 4 IP). The study was carried out in March and April 2009 among third-year students. Participation was voluntary. The data was collected on the basis of an 88-question anonymous questionnaire designed by the authors. The findings presented in this paper are based on the responses to five questions. Statistical analyses utilised the chi-squared test (X2) and the Kruskall-Wallis test at p < 0.05 (STATISTICA 8.0 licensed to Warsaw Medical University). Results: the predominant opinion in the study population (41% PM, 44% PWF, 39% IP; p = NS) was that the physiotherapist community in Poland is divided. However, a considerable percentage of the students (41% PM, 40% PWF, 42% IP; p = NS) had no opinion about that issue. A quarter of the entire study population (33% PM, 35% PWF, 16% IP) named Polish Society of Physiotherapy as a professional organisation for physiotherapists. Only 3% of all students were additionally able to name Polish Society of Rehabilitation. PM and PWF students were able to name scientific societies significantly more frequently (p < 0.001) than IP students. The best known academic journals in physiotherapy and rehabilitation were Fizjoterapia Polska (34%) and Fizjoterapia (32%). Only 11% of the students were able to name Postępy Rehabilitacji. Conclusion: professional and scientific organisations of physiotherapists should undertake promotional activities among students to encourage them to contribute actively to the work of these organisations, which would improve integration of the physiotherapist community, thus helping physiotherapists to defend their professional interests more effectively.