Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: right to respect for private life

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Glosa do wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka z 17 października 2019 r. w sprawie López Ribalda i inni vs. Hiszpania, nr skarg 1874/13 i 8567/13

100%

Góral Z. , Tyc A.

Przegląd Sejmowy

2020

nr 3(158)

255–262

On 17 October 2019, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights overturned the judgment made in the case of López Ribalda and others vs. Spain. It found that there has been no violation of Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fun- damental Freedoms when a supermarket — suspecting theft — used hidden CCTV cameras to record employees in the workplace. The commentary to the judgment contains the authors’ re ections on how the Grand Chamber failed to strike a fair balance between the applicants’ right to respect for their private life and the employer’s interest in the protection of its property rights. Moreover, the commentary pays attention to Articles 222 and 223 of the Labour Code, and considers whether amendments are required under Polish law.

Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 and the Right to Privacy. An Attempt to Answer the Preliminary Question in Case C-694/20

100%

Szymacha A.

Adam Mickiewicz University Law Review

2022

tom 14

209-230

Through an action before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the Belgian Constitutional Court intends to obtain an answer to the question related to the compatibility of Council Directive (EU) 2018/822 with the fundamental right to respect for private life. The mechanism provided by this Directive may violate this right because it consists in obliging the lawyer who has invoked the Legal Professional Privilege to provide information about the evasion of the obligation to inform the authorities about the cross-border arrangement. This arrangement may amount to tax avoidance by the client. I will try to predict the possible response of the CJEU by analyzing its previous case law. Interference with fundamental rights must be proportionate. The secrecy of the lawyer’s communication with his client deserves special protection. The proportionality of the interference may be evidenced by filters such as judicial supervision, intermediation by an independent authority etc.