Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Armia czasów wojny w procesie politycznym w Rosji w 1917 roku

100%

Grebenkin I.

|

2019

|

tom 1

75-87

EN

The article is devoted to the Russian army position in the political process during the revolution of 1917 in Russia. The war period army identity as a social phenomenon, the conditions of its transformation into country political life subject are discussed. The character and the causes of the social political climate of different military men categories on the eve of the revolution are determined. The role of military contingents, institutes, central military figures in the main political events of 1917, such as February and October revolutions, July political crisis, General L. G. Kornilov’s march-off is represented. The main regulatory acts of the new government concerning the army, such as Order 1 of Petrograd Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies and “Declaration of a Soldier and Citizen Rights”, and their influence on the development of the inside situation in the army are considered. The special focus is on the main courses of the army life politization and the political military men’s activity, that are the work of army offices, military social organizations, volunteer campaigns in the front line and the back land. The stages and the particular characteristics of the political leaders and military command authority cooperation are specified.

2

Trzy tradycje rozumienia polityki1

84%

Jabłoński A. W.

|

tom 37

75-92

EN

Three traditions of the understanding politics, which have been traced in this article are: 1. politics as participation, 2. politics as conflict and the exercise of force, and 3. politics as a governing process. The first tradition was founded by the ancient Greek philosophers, especially Aristotle. Its main thesis was the unity of politics, society and ethics. Politics in this tradition was understood as a civic activity motivated by the ideas of justice and public good. This classic tradition constitutes a marginal current of the contemporary empirical theory. The second (modern) tradition in political theory understands politics as a sphere of conflict to be resolved by the exercise of force. It takes the origins in the Machiavellian and Hobbesian political writing. The third tradition – politics as a governing process- is a dominant paradigm of the contemporary theory of politics. Its key concepts are: group pluralism, public policy, performance politics and governance.

3

Migration Policy as Instrument of Ensuring National State Security

71%

Burda M. , Gerasimova I. , Ochacha M.

|

nr 12

183-194

PL

W artykule autorzy analizują związek procesów politycznych, polityki migracyjnej i bezpieczeństwa narodowego państwa. Podstawę metodologiczną badań stanowi metoda dialektyczna, porównawcza i instytucjonalna. Metoda dialektyczna ujawniła dynamikę, prawidłowości i sprzeczności obecne w kształtowaniu polityki migracyjnej państwa. Metoda porównawcza pozwoliła określić charakterystyczne cechy sposobów kształtowania polityki migracyjnej w niektórych krajach UE i Rosji, z uwzględnieniem transformacji systemów politycznych. Metoda instytucjonalna pozwoliła zbadać interakcje władz publicznych z innymi instytucjami społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. W celu przetworzenia danych empirycznych zastosowano metody badań ilościowych i jakościowych. Uwzględniono czynniki atrakcyjności migracyjnej państwa, etapy procesu migracji i ryzyko migracji. W związku z tym szczególną uwagę zwrócono na kryzys migracyjny we współczesnej Europie. Przeanalizowano także czynniki wzrostu popularności partii prawicowo-populistycznych oraz ideę suwerennej polityki migracyjnej poszczególnych państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na opis planu wdrażania mechanizmów „Procesu praskiego” na przykładzie mechanizmów integracji migrantów w Austrii i Czechach oraz udział organów rządowych i instytucji społeczeństwa obywatelskiego w tych mechanizmach. Omówiono także niektóre cechy systemu migracyjnego Federacji Rosyjskiej w kontekście zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa narodowego. Artykuł przedstawia i analizuje pewne dane statystyczne dotyczące migracji w Rosji i na świecie.

EN

In the article, the authors analyse the relationship of political processes, migration policy and national security of the state. The methodological basis of the research is dialectical, comparative and institutional methods. The dialectical method revealed the dynamics, current regularities and contradictions in the formation of the state migration policy. The comparative method contributed to identify characteristic features of the migration policy formation of some EU countries and Russia, taking into account the transformation of political systems. The institutional method allowed exploring the interaction of public authorities with other institutions of civil society. In order to process the empirical evidence, quantitative and qualitative research methods were used. The factors of the migration attractiveness of the state, the stages of the migration process and migration risks are considered. In this regard, special attention is paid to the migration crisis in modern Europe. It also analyses the growth factors of the popularity of right-populist parties and the idea of the sovereign migration policy of individual member states of the European Union. Special attention is paid to the description of the implementation plan for the “Prague Process” mechanisms on the example of the integration mechanisms of migrants to Austria and the Czech Republic, the participation of government bodies and civil society institutions in these mechanisms. Some features of the migration system of the Russian Federation are also considered in the context of ensuring national security. The research presents and analyses some statistical data on migration in Russia and global migration in the world.