Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Glosa do Wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 12 stycznia 2023 r. w sprawie C-356/21, J.K. vs. TP S.A. – Osoba, która świadczy usługi na podstawie umowy o dzieło, również podlega antydyskryminacyjnej ochronie (warunki dostępu do prowadzenia działalności na własny rachunek – zakaz dyskryminacji ze względu na orientację seksualną – swoboda wyboru strony umowy)

100%

Kalisz A. , Krasoń R.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2023

|

nr 6(179)

161-176

EN

The principle of equal rights for the same obligations is one of the core legal principles. A non-exhaustive catalogue of grounds for discrimination has been listed in the provisions of the constitutional as well as in the European law. This means that only certain grounds for discrimination are specified as examples in those provisions. These include sexual orientation. The commented judgement concerns the allegation of employment and labour discrimination (the so-called conditions for access to self-employment) and the anti-discrimination protection for self-employed persons, i.e. those providing services under a contract for specific work. The Court of Justice of the European Union found that the refusal, based on the sexual orientation of a person, to conclude or renew a contract with that person concerning the performance of specific work by that person in a self-employed activity is a potential factor of discrimination (to be examined by the national court) and cannot be justified by Article 5(3) of the Law on equal treatment. In particular, a position which accepts that freedom of contract allows a refusal to enter into a contract with a person on the basis of that person’s sexual orientation would be to deprive Article 3(1)(a) of Directive 2000/78 of its effectiveness (effet utile), in so far as that provision specifically prohibits any discrimination based on such a ground as regards access to self-employment. The co-authors agree with the position of the Court and with the reasoning presented, while also referring to both: the philosophical grounds of the equality principle and the consequent need for an inclusive approach, and to the concept of judicial dialogue provided by preliminary ruling mechanism.

2

Glosa do Wyroku Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka w sprawie Moraru vs. Rumunia z dnia 8 listopada 2022 r. – dyskryminacja na gruncie „warunku dostępu do pracy i nauki”

100%

Kalisz A. , Wojciechowski B.

Przegląd Sejmowy

|

2023

|

nr 2(175)

157-168

EN

The commented judgement concerns an allegation of discrimination in the recruitment process for studies preparing to become a military doctor, when the national authorities denied a female-applicant the right to take the military medical school entrance exam on the basis of her height (she was 150 cm tall and weighed 44 kg). The Ministry of National Defence argued that the law required all military personnel to be able to perform any mission, and that this meant being able to carry a standard soldier’s kit weighing around 57 kg. The European Court of Human Rights found that the reasons why the applicant was treated differently from other women – who met the weight and height requirements – were not “relevant and sufficient”. In particular, the national courts accepted the MND’s argument equating size with strength. Even though size had recently been eliminated from the list of selection criteria and that the applicant was now free to apply to the military academy of her choice, the Court found that she had been unfairly disadvantaged at the time of her application. The co-authors of the gloss agree with the position of the Court and the reasoning presented, while addressing both: the philosophical grounds of the equality principle and the evolution of the judicial dialogue between the ECHR and the CJEU.

3

Stan cywilny osób homoseksualnych a zasada niedyskryminacji w orzecznictwie TSUE na tle odpowiedzi na pytanie prejudycjalne w sprawie c-267/12 – Frédéric Hay przeciw Credit Agricole mutuel de charente-maritime et des deux-sèvres

62%

Schulz A. N.

Studia Prawnicze

|

2015

|

nr 2 (202)

83-98

EN

The text shows impact of the EU law on the internal legal order in question sat the edge of competences of the Members States, as matters of civil status stay beyond the exclusive competences of the EU. The ECJ develops previous case-law concerning relation between the non-discrimination rule and sex-orientation in the labor matters. In the light of the Council Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, the CJEU treated the French PACS concluded by a homosexual couple at the same way as a marriage in spite of the fact that the French legislation had highly differentiated both statuses at the moment when the facts of the case took place. The provisions of “the bank collective agreement, […] under which an employee who concludes a civil solidarity pact with a person of the same sex is not allowed to obtain the same benefits, such as days of special leave and a salary bonus, as those granted to employees on the occasion of their marriage, where the national rules of the Member State concerned do not allow persons of the same sex to marry” create a direct discrimination in the light of the Art.2(2)(a) of Directive2000/78/EC.

4

Unijna zasada zapewnienia niedyskryminującego dostępu a system udzielania zezwoleń w polskim prawie geologicznym i górniczym

58%

Wojtulek P. , Kocowski T.

Przegląd Geologiczny

|

2018

|

tom Vol. 66, nr 2

85--92

EN

The non-discrimination principle of the European Union has become a core basis of the Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994, which introduced the non-discriminatory access to prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons. According to this directive, the EU members were obliged to choose between the non-discriminating methods of granting authorizations of hydrocarbons: either an open door system or a licensing round system. Directive 94/22/WE caused changes in Polish geological and mining law related to introduction of the obligatory tender procedure for licenses (concessions) for prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons. As a result of case C-569/10, the Court of Justice of the European Union ordered the next changes in Polish law involving, e.g., the possibility to apply for Polish concessions by entrepreneurs with no legal seat or industrial plant in Poland. This article comments changes in Polish geological and mining law in 1994-2017, caused by Directive 94/22/WE and jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU. It shows that, due to European legislation, the two-sided proceedings have been introduced depending on the type of mineral resources constituting the mining usufruct in Poland. These different procedures for granting authorizations of hydrocarbons and other resources may justify creation of new, distinct hydrocarbons law in Poland or introduction of non-discriminative procedures, irrespective of the type of deposit.