Healthcare workers are a category particularly exposed to the risk of work-related stress with potential negative repercussions on the level of physical and mental health and on working environments. In terms of remediation, the role of neurolaw and scientific research is fundamental to identify the cases that require more incisive intervention tools and greater resources for risk prevention and management.
2
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
Translating legal neuroscience with artificial intelligence: only in this way will there be a low percentage of wrongful convictions. For some time now, especially in common law jurisdictions, nanotechnology has not been such a remote idea for intervening in the brain activity of criminals. It is a valid reversible tool selective, precise and effective than psychopharmacological treatments. The technology, on which the neurodevices are based, provides a pulse that alerts the subject with such implanted tools,without inhibiting him from his free will and conscious control. The function is thus twofold: predictive and preventive-rehabilitative. The debated question is whether neurointervention should be only voluntary or also mandatory. Is neurointervention an essential component of sentencing or only one of its possible forms? An attempt will be made here to provide an opinion on how the use of nanotechnology applied to neurolaw is legitimate to the principles of substantive and procedural criminal law.
3
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
Neuromarketing utilizes modern techniques of monitoring brain functioning in order to design efficient advertising contents. Due to its capacity to interfere with and to influence decision process of customers, neuromarketing is regarded as highly controversial. The article examines possible manners of protection of individuals from the perspective of personal autonomy and privacy protection. It analyzes possibilities of challenging validity of legal transactions made under influence of neuromarketing based advertising as well as applicability of unfair practices in advertising. The paper also claims that the current personal data protection legislation is not applicable. Privacy of mind is described in terms of privacy of contents and privacy of processes. Mental processes are considered as crucial for creating contents of mind as well as for an individual approach to own privacy. The article concludes that the current regulation of unfair practices as well as the regulation of privacy do not provide an appropriate level of protection and that general clauses should be complemented with specific provision on inadmissible practices in advertising.
The subject of this article is the analysis of the possibilities of using research methods and findings applied in the field of neurolaw in the process of assigning guilt to offenders under criminal law, as well as determining the degree of their guilt. The article presents the achievements of neurolaw – a field that uses research methods used in neurology and related sciences to study law. The study examines the usefulness of research methods used in neurolaw in the process of assigning guilt to the perpetrator of a prohibited act. For this purpose, the theories of guilt and the possibility of using neurolaw research methods in a criminal trial are discussed. The results of studies that show damage to specific areas of the brain have also been cited, and then it has been shown how the damage can affect the ability to recognize the meaning of the act and guide its behavior.
PL
Przedmiotem niniejszego artykułu jest analiza możliwości wykorzystania metod badawczych i ustaleń, stosowanych na gruncie neuroprawa, w procesie prawnokarnego przypisywania winy sprawcom czynów zabronionych, jak również ustalania stopnia ich zawinienia. W artykule przedstawiono dorobek neuroprawa – dziedziny, która do badania prawa wykorzystuje metody badawcze stosowane w neurologii oraz naukach pokrewnych. W opracowaniu zbadano przydatność metod badawczych wykorzystywanych w neuroprawie, w procesie przypisywania winy sprawcy czynu zabronionego. W tym celu omówiono teorie winy i możliwość wykorzystania metod badawczych neuroprawa w procesie karnym. Przytoczono również wyniki badań, które przedstawiają uszkodzenia konkretnych obszarów mózgu, a następnie wykazano, jak uszkodzenia te mogą wpłynąć na możliwość rozpoznania znaczenia czynu i pokierowania swoim postępowaniem.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.