Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Higher Education Students’ Perceptions of Environmental Issues and Media Coverage

100%

Keinonen T. , Palmberg I. , Kukkonen J. , Yli-Panula E. , Persson C. , Vilkonis R.

|

nr 1

5-22

EN

This study aims to find higher education students’ perceptions about environmental issues and how the perceptions are related to perceptions of media coverage. This study investigates higher education students’ perceptions of the seriousness of environmental issues and their relation to perceptions of media coverage. Higher education students perceived a global problem, lack of clean water, as most serious environmental problem. Media has had an effect on students’ perceptions on environmental issues: when students perceived the problem as serious they also perceived the information in media concerning it appropriate. Students perceived that the media underestimate and obscure some environmental problems such as biological diversity and global warming. It was concluded that higher education educators need more knowledge of students’, future decision makers’ concerns and perceptions about environmental issues to develop more effective teaching practices in higher education. Through education environmental issues literacy, which is a precursor for engaged protection of the environment, can be fostered. This study offers some insights into higher education students’ perceptions of the media’s role in environmental issues.

2

MEDIATISATION OF DEMOCRACY - IS THIS THE END OF FREEDOM?

88%

Górka M.

Polish Political Science Yearbook

|

2014

|

tom 43

275-297

EN

The role of the public sphere has increasingly come to the fore in studies concerning the state of democracy in Europe. Similarly the role of culture in formations and transformations not only of personal but of political identities as well has attracted attention. It is the purpose of this article to bring these areas together in a comprehensive approach to media, culture and democracy with a view of the public sphere as a crucial mediating field. Article focuses on the role of media in sustaining and developing democracy, a democratic dialogue and in fulfilling the role of media as the critical watchdog of the political system and other powerful players on the European scene. The concept of knowledge democracy is meant to enable a new focus on the relationships between knowledge production and dissemination, the functioning of the media and our democratic institutions. The emerging concept of knowledge democracy moreover obliges us to realise that the institutional frameworks of today’s societies may appear to be deficient as far as the above mentioned undercurrents, trends and other developments demand change. Democracy is without a doubt the most successful governance concept for societies during the last two centuries. It is a strong brand, even used by rulers who do not meet any democratic criterion. Representation gradually became the predominant mechanism by which the population at large, through elections, provides a body with a general authorization to take decisions in all public domains for a certain period of time. Fragmentation of values has lead to individualisation, to uniqueness but thereby also to the impossibility of being represented in a general manner by a single actor such as a member of parliament. More fundamentally media-politics destroy the original meaning of representation.

3

Migration Coverage in Europe, Russia and the United States

88%

Kreutler M. , Fengler S. , Asadi N. , Bodrunova S. , Budivska H. , Diop L. , Ertz G. , Gigola D. , Katus E. , Kovacs D. , Kuś M. , Láb F. , Litvinenko A. , Mack J. , Maier S. , Pinto Martinho A. , Matei A. , Miller K. C. , Oppermann L. , Pérez Vara E. , Polyák G. , Ravisankar R. , Rodríguez Pérez C. , Semova D. J. , Skleparis D. , Splendore S. , Štefaniková S. , Szynol A. , Telo D. , Zguri R.

|

nr 2(31)

202-226

EN

Six years after the so-called ‘refugee crisis’ in 2015, the European Union remains divided on questions of migration and asylum policy. The issue also remains high on the agendas of the USA and Russia, two other key destination countries with immigration from Latin America and the Post-Soviet space. This article presents results from a comparative study of news coverage in 17 countries, focusing on 10 EU member states in Western and Central Eastern Europe (CEE), the USA and Russia. The intensity of coverage was remarkably different, with Hungary’s and Germany’s media standing out while Russian media displayed relatively low levels of coverage. Individual migrants and refugees were most visible in the two outlets from the USA. Media in CEE countries tended towards a more critical approach than media in Western Europe. However, differences between most countries’ pairs of analyzed media outlets indicate a more pluralistic debate than frequently assumed.

4

Mowa niezależna w przekazie medialnym a podstawowe funkcje informacji dziennikarskiej (część 2)

88%

Grzelka M. , Kula A.

|

nr 2

21-34

PL

This article reports part of a research project currently carried out by the authors devoted to the analysis of quoted speech used by Polish journalists in their discourse after 1989. The first part of the article was published in the previous volume of Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. The present part focuses on the characteristics of the participants (parties) in journalistic information. Prevailing and determining factors related to the number and the type of participants in journalistic information are presented, and fundamental functions of speech verbs (verba dicenti) are indicated. Citation is the most explicit form of inclusion of other-discourse in one’s discourse. The second part of the study provides more detailed analysis that includes the following categories: the category of witnesses, experts (practitioners) and that of experts (theoreticians). The third part of the article is due to be published soon.

5

Barack Obama i Donald Trump w Polsce – obraz medialny wizyt amerykańskich prezydentów w polskiej prasie codziennej

63%

Góra M. K.

|

nr 1

87-103

EN

Visits by American presidents in Poland are important, socio-political and media events. This fact was the motivation to conduct research on media presentation of the visits of two American presidents – Barack Obama in 2011 and Donald Trump in 2017 – to Poland which were presented in Polish daily newspapers. The content analysis was based on opinion-forming titles: “Gazeta Wyborcza”, “Rzeczpospolita” and “Dziennik Gazeta Prawna”, and tabloids: “Fakt” and “Super Express”. The aim of the paper is to show the differences in how selected dailies cover two visits and explain where these differences might come from. The research hypothesis assumes that the ideological profile of chosen daily press determines media image of the American presidential visits in Poland, and that the significance of press materials may impact the formation of readers’ views and opinions about leaders of the USA. The author tried to answer the following questions: do the selected titles show bias against any of the presidents?, is the narration of daily newspapers similar to the tabloid press?, and do they undergo tabloidization? The article consists of five parts. The first part discusses the special relationship between Poland and the USA and the perception of American presidents’ visits to Poland. The second section describes agenda-setting, which is the theoretical framework for this study. The third part of the article describes the research methodology, which is based on content analysis. The fourth section is a description of the study of materials published in Polish daily press. The article ends with a summary of the study results. The bias was demonstrated in “Gazeta Wyborcza” (numerous articles, critical of Donald Trump), “Fakt” (numerous articles with positive attitude towards Barack Obama and Donald Trump) and “Super Express” (numerous satirical articles about Barack Obama). In the context of the discussed issues, daily newspapers did not make their narration similar to tabloid press and did not succumb to the tabloidization of media.

PL

Wizyty przywódców Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki w Polsce stanowią ważne wydarzenie nie tylko społeczno-polityczne, ale także medialne. Fakt ten był motywacją podjęcia badań nad obrazem medialnym wizyt amerykańskich prezydentów w Polsce – Baracka Obamy w 2011 roku oraz Donalda Trumpa w 2017 roku, który przedstawiano na łamach polskiej prasy codziennej. Analizie zawartości poddano tytuły opiniotwórcze: „Gazetę Wyborczą”, „Rzeczpospolitą” i „Dziennik Gazetę Prawną”, oraz tabloidy: „Fakt” i „Super Express”. Celem badań jest pokazanie różnic w sposobach relacjonowania przez wybrane dzienniki obu wizyt oraz wyjaśnienie, skąd te różnice mogą wynikać. Postawiono hipotezę badawczą, która zakłada, że profil ideologiczny wybranych tytułów determinuje obraz medialny wizyt amerykańskich prezydentów w Polsce, a wydźwięk przekazów prasowych może mieć potencjalny wpływ na kształtowanie poglądów, opinii czytelników wobec przywódców USA. Poszukiwano odpowiedzi na pytania: czy wybrane tytuły przejawiają stronniczość wobec któregoś z prezydentów, czy narracja dzienników opinii jest zbliżona do prasy bulwarowej i czy ulegają zjawisku tabloidyzacji? Artykuł składa się z pięciu części. We wstępie omówiono szczególne relacje łączące Polskę i USA oraz postrzeganie wizyt amerykańskich prezydentów w Polsce. W części drugiej opisano agendę-setting będącą ramą teoretyczną niniejszych rozważań. Trzecia sekcja artykułu to opis metodologii badań, która opiera się na analizie zawartości. Czwarta część to omówienie wyników analizy materiałów opublikowanych na łamach wybranych dzienników. Artykuł wieńczy podsumowanie wyników badań. Stronniczość wykazano w „Gazecie Wyborczej” (liczne publikacje krytyczne wobec Donalda Trumpa) oraz „Fakcie” (liczne publikacje pozytywne wobec Baracka Obamy oraz Donalda Trumpa) i „Super Expressie” (liczne publikacje satyryczne wobec Baracka Obamy). W kontekście omawianej problematyki wykazano również, że dzienniki opinii nie upodabniały swojej narracji do prasy bulwarowej oraz nie uległy tabloidyzacji mediów.

6

Obrazy współczesnej religijności w przekazach medialnych ze Światowego Spotkania Rodzin w Dublinie w 2018 r.

51%

Ciesielski R. T.

|

nr 1/267

EN

This article focuses on relations between real religious events and the content of media coverage of those events. The article presents the aims and topics of religious meetings of Catholic families, organized by the Pontifical Council for the Family, which took place under the name of the World Meetings of Families. The main issue concerning media coverage is presented on the example of the account of the 9th World Meeting of Families, which took place in Dublin in 2018. It was guided by the theme Joy for the World. Among the issues discussed during the meeting was the issue of the functioning of Catholic families in the contemporary world including axiological, economic and health themes. The media’s image of the meeting in Dublin was quite different from the real discussions and was marginalized to two topics: speeches delivered by Roco Buttiglione and Jamesa Martina SJ, and the interpretation of symbolism of chasubles used during liturgy.

PL

Światowe Spotkania Rodzin to spotkania katolickich rodzin z całego świata z papieżem, organizowane przez Papieską Radę ds. Rodziny. Inicjatorem tych spotkań był papież Jan Paweł II. Odbywają się co trzy lata, a każde jest poprzedzone międzynarodowym sympozjum teologiczno-duszpasterskim. Głównym celem zwoływania przez papieża Światowych Spotkań Rodzin jest prowadzenie dialogu, ukazywanie roli rodziny w ewangelizacji i umocnienie tożsamości rodziny. Światowe Spotkania Rodzin są uznawane za jedną z najważniejszych inicjatyw duszpasterskich Jana Pawła II.