Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

3 Naše řeč (Our Speech)

3 2009

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: language standardization and codification

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

K vývoji názorů na prameny při zjišťování spisovné normy

100%

Štěpán J.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

2009

tom 92

nr 2

57-71

In the1930s, the sources of the standard norm were based on Ertl’s “good author” theory, lan- guage consciousness, and the oral practices of the intellectual class according to the Prague School of Linguistics. In the 1950s, the sources of the grammatical norm were amplified. In the 1960s, spoken Czech, especially the variety known as “common Czech”, came forth, with the central basis for investigating the standard norm formed by technical and journalistic texts. After the linguistic-pragmatic turn in the 1970s and 1980s, style and communication norms also began to be considered in addition to the standard norm. The plurality of opinions and the revocation of the opinions of the 1930s and the 1960s are typical for the present postmodern period. In this article, the author presents his own hierarchy of sources. In accordance with A. Jedlička and A. Stich, he regards technical and journalistic texts as the most important source, followed by fiction and spoken literary Czech texts.

Konzervativní, či liberální přístup k českému jazykovému standardu?: Výsledky sondy mezi mladými českými lingvisty na Univerzitě Řezno

100%

Nerlich L.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

2009

tom 92

nr 3

122-144

This article is comprised of two parts: the first, empirical part focuses on the linguistic customs within a formal context as well as on the attitude towards the Czech standard language of eight students of Czech Studies at different Czech universities. The results show that our respondents are capable of using the standard language. Additionally, they consider it to be adequate in a highly formal context. Their attitude towards the current Czech standard language is positive; they refuse a move or extension towards substandard language. The second, theoretical part discusses a number of approaches of western standardology with respect to terminology and variability within the linguistic standard.

Takzvané "vztažné věty nepřívlastkové": současné náory na jejich status

75%

Daneš F.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

2009

tom 92

nr 4

169-183

The units of this category of non-restrictive (non-defining) clauses do not express a quality of the denotatum of the head noun, but they provide a continuation of the semantic content of the head clause (continuative clauses), present an explanation of it or further information about it, or simply comment on it (explicative clauses). Puristically oriented linguists reject these units as “incorrect”, “false”, whereas other scholars accept them without reservations, some with certain stylistic limitations. The present author points to the stylistic relevance, necessity and utility of this special category of relative clauses and to the fact that they are currently used in various written genres. Such clauses are freely used in a number of European languages and the author does not find any reasonable argument why they should not be considered and accepted as a fully standard, correct means of expression in Czech as well.