Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  hierarchia norm prawnych
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The topic of the study is the impact of the constitutional right to defense (article 42. 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland) on the content of the norm of article 233 § 1a of the Penal Code formed by the will of the Government. In the initial period after the amendment of the Penal Code, the prosecution seems to have not noticed the hierarchy of legal norms at all and totally ignored the shape of the constitutional right to defense. It is only at a later stage that reflection and a radical change in prosecutorial practice takes place, the effect of which is respect for the fundamental law in the criminal process. Eventually, the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court is shaping up quite unequivocally ruling out the possibility of interpreting and thus applying article 233 § 1a of the Penal Code in the form put forward by the draftsman.
PL
Tematem opracowania jest wpływ konstytucyjnego prawa do obrony (art. 42 ust. 2 Konstytucji) na treść normy z art. 233 § 1a Kodeksu karnego. Prokuratura i sądy w początkowym okresie po noweli Kodeksu karnego zdają się w ogóle nie dostrzegać hierarchii norm prawnych i totalnie ignorować kształt konstytucyjnego prawa do obrony. Dopiero w późniejszym czasie dochodzi do refleksji i radykalnej zmiany praktyki prokuratorskiej i sądowej, efektem której jest poszanowanie ustawy zasadniczej w procesie karnym. Ostatecznie kształtuje się orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego dość jednoznacznie wykluczające możliwość wykładni i – co za tym idzie – stosowania art. 233 § 1a Kodeksu karnego w formie proponowanej przez projektodawcę.
|
2014
|
nr 3 (199)
53-84
EN
The aim of this article is to identify limitations of political independence of the Polish regulatory authorities. To that end the author presents the theoretical conception of political independence of regulatory authorities. Next, based on the EU directives in electronic communications and energy sectors, a standard of political independence of National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) is established. Using such a standard the author examines Polish statutory provisions which may present a threat to the independence of regulatory authorities. The main thesis of the article is that the legal status of the Polish regulatory authorities does not guarantee the level of independence required by the EU legislator. Therefore, the author suggests that the Polish regulatory authorities be removed from the government administration and linked with the parliament. Lastly, the articles discusses the current trend in the EU legal order to gradually widen the political independence of NRAs and the problems arising therefrom and makes de lege ferenda proposals in that sphere.
EN
The article assesses the compatibility of the new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) with the Polish Constitution. It concludes that although the Polish Constitutional Tribunal remains in principle competent to review acts of EU law (including directives if certain conditions are met), the scope of such a review is very limited and consists only of assessing whether EU institutions acted within scope of the competences transferred to them. The same holds true for domestic measures which merely implement directives. As a consequence, any review of the TPD provisions will be very restricted and can hardly lead to their inapplicability on the Polish territory. The article also assesses the compatibility with the Polish Constitution of the plain packaging requirement, which is not provided for, but only suggested by the TPD. In this context, it concludes that the Tribunal will be fully competent to review any national measure that introduces such a restriction. Although the outcome of such a review cannot be predicted with certainty, the article posits that there are good grounds to believe that the plain packaging requirement will be considered constitutional (i.e. in particular with respect to those provisions of the Constitution which protect property and freedom of economic activity).
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.