Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: hermeneutic phenomenology

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Neither Heresy Nor Renewal: Phenomenology as Permanent Self-Correction and Self-Improvement

100%

Przyłębski A.

Dialogue and Universalism

2015

nr 3

51-61

The article considers the problem of the redefinition of the concept of phenomenol-ogy after Heidegger’s critique of the idea of presuppositionlessness, Ricoeur’s criticism of the beginning of the transcendental ego, and Merleau-Ponty’s criticism of Husserl’s perceptual apprehension.

Family Relationships, Dialogue, and Philosophy for Children:

100%

D'Addelfio G. , Vinciguerra M.

Multidisciplinary Journal of School Education

2021

tom 10

nr 1(19)

13-27

The paper deals with the importance of words and dialogue in family education. In the first part, some evidence of an action research is presented – shaped in a hermeneutic phenomenological framework and thanks to the Philosophy for Children method and materials. Then some key words are pointed out, meant as formative goals for parents’ educational support, so as to highlight the importance of dialogue among generations and, mainly, of the ethical responsibility of parents in education.

Ja – ty – dzieło jako źródło poznania. Między neokantyzmem a hermeneutyką: Cassirer i Ricoeur

72%

Węgrzyn M.

Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris

2020

tom 50

nr 3

19-43

An attempt to compare the epistemological positions of two thinkers coming from different philosophical traditions requires turning to the sources of both philosophical programs. This will allow us to reveal the common and differentiating features of the described projects. On the one hand, we have Cassirer, the heir to neo-Kantianism and the creator of symbolism, on the other, we are rooted in the tradition of reflective philosophy and phenomenological hermeneutics, Ricoeur. Despite many differences in epistemological assumptions, we can find similar positions in both philosophers. The concurrence of the three Cassirerow base phenomena with three hermeneutic horizons manifests itself - as we will try to demonstrate - in the concept of the Work. The hermeneutic intuition of Cassirer turns into Ricoeur's reflection on self-understanding in the face of a work that affects our perception of the world and thinking about ourselves.In the article, we will consider how the contemporary philosophy of culture developed by Cassirer is taken up by contemporary hermeneutics. Is the convergence of the three base phenomena with the three horizons that combine with each other in the process of interpretation in the juxtaposition of the philosophy of culture with contemporary hermeneutics? Do we have the right to compare Cassirerow's base phenomena, I - You -Work is with hermeneutic communication which is presented on the line Author (Creator) -Text (Work) - Reader (Receiver)?

Bytostná role předporozumění u vybraných zakladatelů kvantové teorie

58%

Grygar F.

Teorie vědy (Theory of Science)

2021

tom 43

nr 1

59-93

The study deals with an existential role of preunderstandings in the works of the leading founders of quantum theory. First, the study introduces Heidegger’s hermeneuticphenomenological approach to the concept of understanding. Second, this concept is applied to various ways of thinking with which physicists (Planck, Einstein, de Broglie, Rutherford, Bohr, Heisenberg and Schrödinger) approached the solutions of scientific puzzles and constructions of new assumptions in the development of quantum theory. The article seeks to contribute to the debate in the methodology and philosophy of science and points out that the role of preunderstandings is still underestimated.

Článek se zabývá existenciální rolí předporozumění u vůdčích zakladatelů kvantové teorie. V první části článek představuje Heideggerovo hermeneuticko-fenomenologické uchopení pojmu rozumění. Ve druhé části se autor pokouší prostřednictvím rozmanitých příkladů aplikovat tuto koncepci na způsob myšlení, s nímž fyzici (Planck, Einstein, de Broglie, Rutherford, Bohr, Heisenberg a Schrödinger) přistupovali k řešení vědeckých hádanek a návrhům nových předpokladů při vzniku kvantové teorie. Text je příspěvkem do debat v rámci filosofie a metodologie vědy, v níž je stále podceňována zásadní role předporozumění ve vědeckých aktivitách.