Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Miękkie finansowanie jako kluczowy czynnik w powstawaniu bańki cenowej na rynku nieruchomości

100%

Nowakowski K.

Ekonomia XXI Wieku

|

2014

|

nr 1(1)

151-167

EN

The multiplicity of approaches and perspectives used for the explanation of enormous price increases indicates the complexity of this process. The aim of the article is the explanation of the real estate bubble through the identification of soft budget constraint as the key factor in its formation. For this purpose the soft budget constraint has been defined in the aspect of the real estate bubble on two levels of capital creation. The first one placed in the sphere of real economy is the meeting place of lenders and borrowers looking for the source of financing of the real estate assets. The second placed in the finance sphere is a meeting place of banks and other financial institutions generating the capital on a huge scale. In the article the institutional basis of soft budget constraint has been analyzed from the perspective of two levels of generation of capital by the identification of key factors in connection with enormous price increase. The research has been performed for three countries: Spain, the United States of America and Poland. In the performed analysis there were described the factors of soft budget constraint similar and different for each of the country. The performed research of soft budget constraint led to the following conclusions. In all of the analyzed countries severe credit policy had not a preventing function and was rather an answer for the emerging economic conditions. The soft credit policy was realized for the longer period of time only in the United States and in this country had the most significant impact on the increase of credit action and growth of real estate prices. The analysis of the lending standards shows symptoms of soft budget constraint in the real sphere. In each of the analyzed countries the mortgages were granted even for the period of fifty years, with the zero down payments, many times with the loan to value ratio above 100%. The next factor of soft budget constraint was the introduction of new banking products in the United States and Spain such as interest-only mortgages and adjustable rate mortgages. In the financial sphere the huge in size accelaration of generation of capital was identified in the form of securitization present on an enourmous scale in the United States and on a smaller scale in Spain. This process led to the additional credit action by the elimination of toxic assets from the balance sheets and transfer of a risk which also finally led to real estate price increases. The research of the quality of mortgages portfolios confirmed the existence of the soft budget constraint factors in the period of boom on the real estate market. In each of the examined countries there was an increase of share of nonperforming loans in the value of all mortgages. The highest dynamic of increase of nonperfoming loans was identifed in the United States. In this country the cumulation of several factors of soft budget constraints was observed on each of analyzed levels. This cumulation led to

2

The institutional matrices theory as the basis of explanation of real estate bubble.

88%

Nowakowski K.

Managerial Economics

|

2013

|

tom 14

113-135

EN

The increase of prices that could not be explained on the basis of fundamentals is still a very complex process. The economic bubbles have occurred over hundreds of years. Multiplicity of markets, geographical spread and variety of items influenced by bubble makes them still poorly understood. Insufficiency of actual structures for understanding and predicting the economic bubble was the reason for explanation based on the ground of new institutional economy. In the article factors creating the real estate bubble are examined using the institutional matrices theory. The research is performed through the analysis of data and identification of factors conductive in formation of enormous price increase in the United States, Spain and Poland. The study confirms that the lack of balanced combination of dominant and complementary matrices institutions leads to the creation of real estate bubbles. Besides, it was confirmed that the combination of dominant Y-matrix with their basic institutions is the necessary condition of the growth beyond the fundamentals. The examined institutions distorting the market growth and turning it into the bubble have been divided into two groups. First, unintended effects of intervention in market mechanism, has been examined by the identification of housing finance organization in the United States and analysis of the effects of their activity, analysis of social housing policy in Spain and Poland, and finally by the analysis of tax and subsidies systems. Second group, wrongly understood full “liberalization” and deregulation of all market processes, has been examined at two levels: creation of debt for the customers and financing banks themselves. Research was performed in this group in the area of bank lending standards, securitization process and capital requirements for banks. The activities of intervention in the market mechanism were against the dominant matrix and were planned for stabilization and stimulation of real estate market. But in fact supports the speculation and blow of the bubble due to the inappropriate design of institutions of complementary matrix. The activities of wrongly understood full „liberalization” were intended for absolute deregulation by elimination of institutions of complementary matrix. Research confirms that liberalization is possible in the healthy economy however it does not mean for sure that market mechanism could work without any institutions.

3

The institutional matrices theory as the basis of explanation of real estate bubble

63%

Nowakowski K.

Managerial Economics

|

2013

|

tom nr 14

113--135

EN

The increase of prices that could not be explained on the basis of fundamentals is still a very complex process. The economic bubbles have occurred over hundreds of years. Multiplicity of markets, geographical spread and variety of items influenced by bubble makes them still poorly understood. Insufficiency of actual structures for understanding and predicting the economic bubble was the reason for explanation based on the ground of new institutional economy. In the article factors creating the real estate bubble are examined using the institutional matrices theory. The research is performed through the analysis of data and identification of factors conductive in formation of enormous price increase in the United States, Spain and Poland. The study confirms that the lack of balanced combination of dominant and complementary matrices institutions leads to the creation of real estate bubbles. Besides, it was confirmed that the combination of dominant Y-matrix with their basic institutions is the necessary condition of the growth beyond the fundamentals. The examined institutions distorting the market growth and turning it into the bubble have been divided into two groups. First, unintended effects of intervention in market mechanism, has been examined by the identification of housing finance organization in the United States and analysis of the effects of their activity, analysis of social housing policy in Spain and Poland, and finally by the analysis of tax and subsidies systems. Second group, wrongly understood full “liberalization” and deregulation of all market processes, has been examined at two levels: creation of debt for the customers and financing banks themselves. Research was performed in this group in the area of bank lending standards, securitization process and capital requirements for banks. The activities of intervention in the market mechanism were against the dominant matrix and were planned for stabilization and stimulation of real estate market. But in fact supports the speculation and blow of the bubble due to the inappropriate design of institutions of complementary matrix. The activities of wrongly understood full „liberalization” were intended for absolute deregulation by elimination of institutions of complementary matrix. Research confirms that liberalization is possible in the healthy economy however it does not mean for sure that market mechanism could work without any institutions.

PL

Wzrost cen, którego nie można wyjaśnić, odnosząc się do wartości fundamentalnych, jest nadal bardzo złożonym procesem. Bańki cenowe występują na przestrzeni kilkuset lat. Złożoność rynków, ich rozproszenie geograficzne oraz różnorodność przedmiotów objętych zjawiskiem bańki czyni je ciągle niewystarczająco zrozumianym zjawiskiem. Brak wystarczających aktualnych struktur pozwalających zrozumieć i przewidzieć zjawisko bańki cenowej był powodem wyjaśniania jej na gruncie nowej ekonomii instytucjonalnej. W artykule czynniki tworzące bańkę cenową na rynku nieruchomości zostały zbadane przy zastosowaniu teorii matrycy instytucjonalnej. Badania przeprowadzono, dokonując analizy danych i identyfikując czynniki sprzyjające tworzeniu ogromnych rozmiarów wzrostu ceny w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Hiszpanii i Polsce. Badania potwierdziły, że brak zbilansowanej kombinacji instytucji matrycy dominującej i komplementarnej prowadzi do powstawania bańki cenowej na rynku nieruchomości. W artykule potwierdzono również fakt, iż warunkiem bazowym wzrostów przekraczających wartości fundamentalne jest struktura z dominacją matrycy Y z jej bazowymi instytucjami. Zbadane instytucje zakłócające wzrost rynkowy i przekształcające go w bańkę zostały podzielone na dwie grupy. Pierwsza, niezamierzone efekty ingerencji w mechanizm rynkowy, została zbadana przez identyfikację organizacji wspierających zakup nieruchomości w Stanach Zjednoczonych i analizę efektów ich działalności, analizę społecznej polityki mieszkaniowej w Polsce i Hiszpanii oraz analizę systemu ulg podatkowych i dopłat. Druga grupa, błędnie rozumiana pełna „liberalizacja" i deregulacja wszystkich procesów rynkowych, została zbadana na dwóch poziomach: kreacji kredytu dla klientów i pozyskiwania kapitału przez same banki. Badania zostały przeprowadzone w tej grupie w obszarze standardów udzielania kredytów, procesu sekurytyzacji i wymogów kapitałowych. Działania ingerujące w mechanizm rynkowy będące w sprzeczności z dominującą matrycą Y miały na celu stabilizację i stymulację rynku nieruchomości. W rzeczywistości wspierały jednak spekulację i pompowanie bańki, ponieważ instytucje matrycy komplementarnej nie zostały prawidłowo zaprojektowane. Działania dążące do błędnie rozumianej pełnej „liberalizacji" miały na celu absolutną deregulację przez eliminację instytucji komplementarnych. Badania potwierdziły, iż liberalizacja jest możliwa w zdrowo funkcjonującym systemie, ale nie oznacza na pewno, iż mechanizm rynkowy może funkcjonować bez żadnych instytucji.

4

Złoża Windarra (Australia Zachodnia) i Poseidon Nickel Limited – przykład ryzykownej gry spekulacyjnej na złożu niklu

51%

Kaczan W.

Hereditas Minariorum

|

2020

|

tom Vol. 6

181--185

EN

The article aims to briefly introduce the history of the Windarra deposit and the Poseidon Nickel Limited enterprise. Nickel deposit in Windarra became the subject of one of the most famous economic bubble called the Poseidon bubble. The described story shows the risky character of the mining and exploration investment and the changeable state of deposits.

5

„Abenomika” w obliczu wyzwań dla bezpieczeństwa ekonomicznego Japonii

44%

Michalak P.

Studia i Analizy Nauk o Polityce

|

2021

|

nr 1

51-68

EN

The main aims of the article are to provide a general assessment of the economic policy of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s government in 2012-2020. The current economic and social situation in Japan is presented with an in-depth analysis of the elements selected by the author. The last part of the article is a case study – the main assumptions of “abenomics” are presented, and its effectiveness based on economic indicators is discussed. Actions taken as part of the pursued monetary and fiscal policy were insufficient. The “three arrows” policy did not bring the expected results mainly due to the neglect of structural reforms and the adjustment of decisions to the calendar of political events.

PL

Głównym celem artykułu jest ogólna ocena polityki gospodarczej rządu premiera Shinzo Abe w latach 2012-2020. Zaprezentowano obecną sytuację ekonomiczno-społeczną w Japonii, z pogłębioną analizą wybranych przez autora elementów. Ostatnią część artykułu stanowi studium przypadku, w którym przedstawiono główne założenia „abenomiki” i omówiono jej skuteczność w oparciu o wskaźniki ekonomiczne. Działania podejmowane w ramach prowadzonej polityki monetarnej i fiskalnej były niewystarczające. Polityka „trzech strzał” nie przyniosła zamierzonych efektów głównie przez zaniechania na polu reform strukturalnych i dostosowywanie decyzji do kalendarza wydarzeń politycznych.