Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

2 Ochrona Zabytków

2 1983

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: dzieje fabryki

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

Dawna Fabryka Norblina w Warszawie - szopa na rowery czy katedra w Lincoln?

100%

Kubiak J.

Ochrona Zabytków

1983

nr 1-2

110-112

The author tries to answer the question whether old Norblin’s factory in Warsaw has to be preserved and treated as a monument. In the beginning, however, he describes the history of the building, which despite adversities of the fortune and two world wars has survived until our days in an almost unimpaired form. The old factory complex has still buildings from all phases of the history from 1780 to 1939. For some time it housed the Warsaawa Metail Rolling Mill. According to various opinions, the complex, situated in the centre of the town, is to be either pulled down or preserved as a monument of the past. A* conservation experts report worked out in the Monuments Conservation Workshop and based on the future programme for the use of the complex has revealed its usefulness as a branch of the Museum of Technics. The report postulates to use all historic objects to a maximum extent. Just as the discussion on the future of former Norblin’s factory has been going on for a few years, the author thinks it worthwhile to point out some theoretical and functional aspects of the problem of the protection of industrial architecture both on a townplanning, architectionic and functional scale. Quoting the opinion of Professor Jan Białostocki, one of the best known Polish art historians, the author states that to regard Norblin’s complex as ”a clumsy and unesthetical architectural product (as it is thought by some experts) is an erroneous assumption inadequate to contemporary criterions of the evaluation and appreciation of all man-made objects. In this context, this statement loses its justification. Former Norblin’s factory is a testimony of the past, and arguments frequently repeated in discussions that these buildings are technically worn-out and have no u tility value must be rejected in this light, because they constitute one of rare documents on the development of the industrial society. Despite appearances, the outwardly ugly and technically worn-out walls of Norblin’s factory conceal much information on the past epoch, to which the author provides the proofs.

Komu Norblina, komu?

100%

Sawicki O. , Szczerba W.

Ochrona Zabytków

1983

nr 1-2

101-110

The example of old Norblin’s factory in Warsaw shows that seemingly uninteresting and neglected old industrial structures conceal great historic values. They should be protected and adapted for contemporary functions in order to illustrate in this way the history of our home industry. Warsaw has a number of industrial buildings which the Town Monuments Conservator is ready to protect against inevitable decline. However, this is not always possible. It is often the case that before we realize the values represented by a specific structure it is already earmarked for demolition as useless and technically worn-out. Its repair is too expensive for those interested in its rescue. Unfortunately interventions of conservators and appeals for the concern for the old factory are not always e ffe c tive. The programme for the protection and new application of former Norblin’s factory, situated in the centre of Warsaw of today, was distinguished in 1981 with the 1st Prize of the General Monuments Conservator in an annual competition for design works in the field of monuments protection. The present article will undoubtedly bring the Readers closer to the problems faced by the authors of the programme envisaged for this exceptionally specific specimen of industrial architecture typical of the 18th-19th centuries, i.e. Norblin. The building is situated in the heart of the town and thus makes difficult the extension of the traffic system. When the hitherto user of the factory (’’Warszawa” Metal Rolling Mill) le ft the old walls and moved into new premises the Museum of Technics undertook the initiative to rescue the structure, seeing in it an opportunity of arranging th e re the Museum of the Warsaw Industry. The initiative was received by the population with great applause. On the other hand, town authorities are still ready to pull down the building in order to unblock a traffic system in this part of Warsaw. The authors of the programme worked out four proposals for future appearance of Norblin’s factory, as apart from the Museum of Technics, Warsaw craftsmen, the Museum of Printing and Monuments Conservation Workshop also show their interest in the idea. One thing is certain — the complex has to serve Warsaw’s inhabitants and cannot be demolished.