Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Romana Ingardena opalizacje i oscylacje literackie

100%

Mordka A.

|

2022

|

nr 8: "Filozofia w Galicji III"

284-305

EN

The aim of this article is to present Roman Ingarden’s concept of literary opalization and oscillation. The problem of specific literary ambiguity, vagueness, variability will be considered on two complementary planes. The first plane will describe the phenomenon of opalescence and oscillation of the sound and meaning of a linguistic expression, while the second plane will focus on the layer of literary appearances and represented objects. Adopting such an order of considerations will make it possible to indicate those ‘places’ of a literary work of art in which this phenomenon is clearly present and sometimes determines its aesthetic value.

PL

Celem tego artykułu jest prezentacja Romana Ingardena koncepcji opalizacji i oscylacji literackich. Problem specyficznej literackiej niejednoznaczności, niejasności, zmienności zostanie rozważony na dwóch uzupełniających się płaszczyznach. Na płaszczyźnie pierwszej opisane zostanie zjawisko opalizacji i oscylacji brzmienia i znaczenia wyrażenia językowego, zaś na płaszczyźnie drugiej zostanie ono uchwycone w warstwie literackich wyglądów i przedmiotów przedstawionych. Przyjęcie takiego porządku rozważań pozwoli wskazać na te „miejsca” literackiego dzieła sztuki, w których zjawisko to jest wyraźnie obecne i niekiedy przesądza o jego wartości estetycznej.

2

Miejsce czy miejsca? Kilka uwag na temat propozycji Romana Ingardena dotyczących łączenia intencjonalnych i rzeczywistych miejsc w dziele literackim

80%

Petryszak K.

|

tom 58

|

nr 2

127-145

EN

The following paper presents a proposal to complement Roman Ingarden’s philosophy of literature. Ingarden assumed that there is some identity or some connection between the place where the action takes place in a literary work and the real place, if such a place is indicated by a literary work (e.g. Grodzka Street in Krakow). Based on the arguments of Hilary Putnam, extended for the purposes of the topic, and metaphysical aspects of recentivism by Józef Bańka, arguments are presented to show that it is not possible to maintain a claim of connectivity between intentional places in a literary work and actual places. The consequences of such an addition to the indicated point of Ingarden’s philosophy of literature are also pointed out.

PL

W artykule została przedstawiona propozycja uzupełnienia filozofii literatury Romana Ingardena. Fenomenolog ten zakładał, że między miejscem rozgrywania się akcji w dziele literackim a faktycznym miejscem – jeśli na takie miejsce wskazywałoby dzieło literackie (np. ul. Grodzka w Krakowie) – zachodzi pewna tożsamość lub pewna łączność. W oparciu o poszerzoną na potrzeby tematu argumentację Hilarego Putnama i metafizyczne aspekty recentywizmu Józefa Bańki przedstawiono argumenty wskazujące, że nie jest możliwe utrzymanie twierdzenia o łączności między miejscami intencjonalnymi w dziele literackim a miejscami rzeczywistymi. Przedstawiono również konsekwencje takiego uzupełnienia wskazanego punktu filozofii literatury Ingardena.

3

The place of imagination in the theory of literary work

80%

Kowalik Ł. , Kowalik Ł.

|

nr 4

4

Pracowite dno sadzawki. Socjologia moralności a literatura piękna

80%

Sztalt K.

|

tom 13

1-9

EN

Krzysztof Sztalt’s aim in this article is to highlight the cognitive values of literature in the field of morality and axiology. He begins by listing the functions of literature and emphasizing the cognitive function. He goes on to indicate the differences between literary and scientific cognition. He then considers the possibility of focusing, during the process of the cognition of literary works, on moral and axiological problems. Addressing these problems he cites a specific literary examples. He argues that pre-sociological literary cognition can be no less valuable and important than sociological cognition. In his opinion, both forms of cognition complement each other.

PL

Artykuł w zamierzeniu autora ma uwidaczniać poznawcze walory literatury w zakresie moralności i aksjologii. Tekst zaczyna się od wymienienia funkcji literatury, podkreślając funkcję poznawczą. Wskazuje na różnice poznania literackiego i naukowego. Następnie autor przedstawia możliwość skupienia się, podczas poznania literackiego, na kwestiach moralnych i aksjologicznych, posiłkuje się przy tym konkretnymi przykładami literackimi. Stoi na stanowisku, że przed-socjologiczne poznanie literackie może być nie mniej cenne i doniosłe od poznania socjologicznego. Oba, jego zdaniem, niejako się uzupełniają.

5

The Aesthetic Value of Literary Works in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy

70%

Jakha H.

|

nr 32

165-185

DE

In dem Artikel analysiere ich Ingardens Konzept des ästhetischen Wertes eines literarischen Werkes. Im Anschluss an Mitscherling versuche ich, Ingardens Ästhetik in sein phänomenologisch-ontologisches Gesamtprojekt einzuordnen. Ich behaupte, dass Ingardens Ästhetik nur dann richtig erkannt werden kann, wenn man seine ontologischen Überlegungen versteht, denn wie Ingarden selbst oft betont hat, sind alle seine philosophischen Untersuchungen eine realistische Antwort auf Husserls angebliche Hinwendung zum transzendentalen Idealismus. Zu diesem Zweck stelle ich Ansichten aus seiner Ästhetik und Ontologie nebeneinander und schaffe so einen kohärenten Werteansatz, in dem künstlerische und ästhetische Werte selbst auf die gleiche Weise analysiert werden, wie sie sich in einem literarischen Werk manifestieren. Ich behaupte, dass dank der ontologischen Analyse ästhetischer (und künstlerischer) Werte ein literarisches Werk in seiner Schichtstruktur transparenter wird.

PL

W artykule analizuję Ingardenowską koncepcję wartości estetycznej dzieła literackiego. Idąc tropem Mitscherlinga, próbuję umieścić estetykę Ingardena w ramach jego całościowego projektu fenomenologiczno-ontologicznego. Twierdzę, że estetykę Ingardena można właściwie poznać jedynie poprzez zrozumienie jego rozważań ontologicznych, ponieważ - jak często podkreślał sam Ingarden – wszystkie jego dociekania filozoficzne stanowią realistyczną odpowiedź na rzekomy zwrot Husserla w stronę idealizmu transcendentalnego. W tym celu zestawiam ze sobą poglądy z jego estetyki i ontologii, tworząc tym sposobem spójne ujęcie wartości, w którym same wartości artystyczne i estetyczne są analizowane w taki sposób, jak przejawiają się w dziele literackim. Twierdzę, że dzięki ontologicznej analizie wartości estetycznych (i artystycznych) dzieło literackie staje się bardziej przejrzyste w swej strukturze warstwowej.

EN

In this paper, I attempt to formulate an Ingardenian conception of the literary work’s aesthetic value. Following Mitscherling’s lead, I attempt to place Ingarden’s aesthetics within his overall phenomenological-ontological project. That is, I argue that Ingarden’s aesthetics can only be properly fathomed in the context of his ontological deliberations, since, as he himself often enunciated, all his philosophical investigations constitute a realist rejoinder to Husserl’s turn toward transcendental idealism. To this end, I bring together insights from his aesthetics and ontology to establish a coherent account of values, where artistic and aesthetic values are analyzed as they manifest themselves in the literary work of art. By attending to the ontology of its aesthetic (and artistic) values, I argue, the literary work’s stratified formation becomes more explicit.

6

Theory of Relativity of the Literary Translation: Literary Criticism Projections

61%

Lanovik M. â. B. M. â. L.

|

nr 4(4)

219-224

EN

The research of Mariana Lanovyk deals with the Literary Criticism problems of translation. In the situation when the plurality of approaches in the Contemporary Literary Criticism can be overwhelming Ukrainian scholars have to work on the adaptation of foreign paradigms in the Ukrainian Criticism space to create solid foundation for the future studies in the fields of the Comparative Literature and Literary Theory. This research is the first attempt in Ukraine to present the integral outlook upon the problems of Literary Translation from the perspectives of the concepts and ideas of different Literary Paradigms of the 19-20th centuries beginning with the Romanticism epoch. Romanticism was chosen as the starting point because in the aesthetic concept of Romanticism there new theoretical approach to the problems of literary translation in the author – language – epoch – nation contexts was outworked. Philosophic, artistic and literary concepts of that time were developed in all modern literary paradigms. The first chapter of the book deals with the psychological and cultural approaches to the problems of the Literary Translation. The author gives short outlook of the genesis of new theoretical background in the aesthetic concept of Romanticism as the source of contemporary theories of translation and the continuation of the ideas in psycholinguistic studies of the Western Europe and in Ukraine, especially in the Potebnja’s literary criticism works. The main attention is concerned on the problem of correlation between thinking process and language, thought and image. The influence of the ideas of 19th century upon the psychoanalysis and their transformation in this paradigm is considered. The author studies the phenomena of consciousness, self consciousness and sub consciousness in the process of reading, understanding and translation as well as the peculiarities of different gender reading, interpretation and translation different elements of the writing works. The differences of literature translation in the realms of biological, linguistic, psychoanalytic and cultural paradigms are considered. The author examines the role of individual and national, historical, cultural memory in literary texts and the possible ways of their transfer. Contemporary approach to the national problem in translation studies development is connected with the key points of national images in literature texts. This idea is rooted in the spectrum of the East-West background as well as national values in the literature systems. The outlook of the multiculturalism and intercultural communication in literature is offered through the review of the artistic nature of the mythological thinking. The wide spectrum of different points of view upon the problem (E.Cassirer, K.G.Jung, E.Noimann, N.Frye) is given. The second chapter of the research deals with the translation criticism ideas in the light of the main concepts of formalism and structuralism. The possible ways of translation analysis as the dissolving problems of form transformation and constructing the literary text by means of the foreign language in foreign literature system are suggested. The concepts of R.Jakobson, J.Tynianov, J.Mukarzevsky, especially the concepts of hierarchy and dominants in literary work, inner structuring and organization of the meaning, functioning of text and its components as the whole are outlined. As the foundation of the research logic of the semiotic analyses was chosen Lotman’s dynamic model of semiotic system, that was proved with adjoining studies of the foreign scholars such as K.Levi-Strauss, J.Mukharzovsky, J.Derrida. Among the narratological questions of fiction translation are discussed such questions as voice authority and correlation of the voices in translated texts; the possibilities of study of different narrative instances of interpreter. In the third chapter the problems of the text reading, realization, interpretation are discussed. The main paradigms involved here are hermeneutics, phenomenology, receptive aesthetics, intuitivism and other irrational approaches to the text interpretation (such as game theory, metaphorology, imagology, relativism theory, discourse analyses). Among the problems of translation from the point of view of hermeneutic approach the main attention is concerned upon the stages of reception, understanding and interpretation as well as the different horizons of reading. The phenomenon of movement of horizons and connected difficulties of fusions of horizons in acts of reception, interpretation and translation are analyzed. The author tries to answer the questions about different points of view and the problem of partial reception and reproducibility; as well as the question of subjectivity in the process of translation. She gives the consideration of the ideas of Ukrainian (A.Potebnja, O.Biletsky) and foreign (F.D.Shleiermaher, V.Dilthey, M.Husserl, H.-G.Gadamer) scholars and examines the possible ways of their application to the translation studies. The thoughts of the phenomenology paradigm are based upon the ideas of E.Husserl, R.Ingarden, P.Ricouer. The main attention is drawn to the spectrum of potential of possible readings and translations of every text from the different time and space perspectives such as different epochs, individual and national experience; historical, cultural and artistic systems. In this way phenomenology of translation reveals new ideas about the text existence and its possible measures. They are connected with the problems of modeling and reflection of the world as the specific author’s vision. New tendencies of resolving of subjectivity of literary texts interpretation coursed with the post structuralism and deconstructivism tendencies are outlined in the key of the hermeneutic concept where the author’s position is dominant in the process of translation. Modern realization of the author’s perspective concept in the works of E.D.Hirsh, J.P.Sartre, U.Eco, N.Frye and others opens rational approach to the problem of resolving of ‘conflict of interpretations’ not only in the dimension of interpretative schemes of literary studies but in the system of translation studies too. On the basis of Relativism theory foundation the author tries to find both the way of synchronizing coordinate systems of original texts and its interpretations and the possible way of synchronizing the systems of interpretative paradigms in contemporary literary studies. In the conclusion the author underlines that shifts of the literary theories paradigms of the 19-20th centuries course the shifts in translation studies thinking; and together they create the common space of semiotic sphere of translation and interpretation. The question of the main importance is to consider the differences of methods of the paradigms as well as their mutual relation, influence and interaction.