Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Struktura dynamizmu człowieka-osoby w antropologii adekwatnej Karola Wojtyły

100%

Pala A.

Logos i Ethos

|

2018

|

tom 47

|

nr 1

EN

The issue of dynamism plays an important role in Karol Wojtyła’s philosophical anthropology. His study takes into account the context of the philosophy of being and the philosophy of consciousness. He emphasizes the importance of experiencing one’s own subjectivity in the course of dynamism.The purpose of the article is to present the structure of human dynamism proposed by Wojtyła. It contains three types of dynamism: dynamism of suppositum, dynamism in a human being (when something happens to him) and dynamism of human action. The first is in the metaphysical field, two more in the phenomenological field. This structure also contains the fieri factor understood as directing the dynamism to the subject.

PL

Zagadnienie dynamizmu zajmuje ważne miejsce w antropologii filozoficznej Karola Wojtyły. Jego badania uwzględniają kontekst filozofii bytu oraz filozofii świadomości. Akcentuje znaczenie przeżycia własnej podmiotowości w trakcie dynamizmu.Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie zaproponowanej przez niego struktury ludzkiego dynamizmu. Zawiera ona trzy rodzaje dynamizmu: dynamizm suppositum, dynamizm uczynnień oraz dynamizm czynu. Pierwszy ujmowany jest w polu metafizycznym, dwa kolejne w polu fenomenologicznym. W ramach tej struktury ukazano także rolę, jaką pełni fieri, oznaczające skierowanie dynamizmu na swój podmiot.

2

Wychowanie jako kształtowanie i integracja dynamizmu ludzkiego

100%

Mazur P. S.

Horyzonty Wychowania

|

2015

|

tom 14

|

nr 31

189-202

EN

This article offers philosophical reflections on the classical conception of upbringing, considered in the light of the distinction between two forms of human dynamism: the dynamism in man and the dynamism of man. The subjective aspect of education surely furnishes the main reason for needing to improve human conduct, due to the presence of various dynamisms in man that are insufficiently integrated with one another. The formation and integration of these always rests on a certain conception of man, and thus also on some corresponding fundamental principle pertaining to this integration. The classical conception of upbringing implies that man, as the subject of education, is a personal being whose nature, at the same time both spiritual and corporeal, is constituted as an active potentiality. The proper development of this nature takes place through the acquisition of the moral virtues, which are based on the primacy of the dynamism of man (intellect and will) over the dynamism in man (in the sense of the sphere of vital bodily impulses).

PL

Przedmiotem artykułu jest filozoficzny namysł nad klasyczną koncepcją wychowania w świetle rozróżnienia dynamizmu w człowieku i dynamizmu człowieka. W aspekcie podmiotowym zasadniczą racją wychowania jest konieczność doskonalenia ludzkiego działania z uwagi na obecność w człowieku różnorodnych dynamizmów, które nie są z sobą w dostateczny sposób zintegrowane. Ich kształtowanie i integracja dokonuje się zawsze według określonej koncepcji człowieka oraz odpowiadającej jej naczelnej zasadzie tej integracji. Klasyczna koncepcja wychowania zakłada zaś, że człowiek jako podmiot wychowania jest bytem osobowym, którego duchowo-cielesna natura jest spotencjalizowana. Właściwa aktualizacja tej natury dokonuje się za sprawą nabycia cnót moralnych, którego podstawą jest prymat dynamizmu człowieka (rozumu i woli) względem dynamizmu w człowieku (sfera witalno-cielesno-popędowa).

3

Wprowadzenie do arysto-tomizmu

100%

Piotrowski R.

Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy

|

2013

|

tom 10

267-269

PL

Recenzja książki: Piotr LENARTOWICZ i Jolanta KOSZTEYN, Wprowadzenie do filozofii, wyd. 4., Petrus, Kraków 2012, s. 184.

EN

Review of: Piotr LENARTOWICZ i Jolanta KOSZTEYN, Wprowadzenie do filozofii, wyd. 4., Petrus, Kraków 2012, s. 184.

4

Dynamism, hostility and complexity of the organisation's environment. Empirical verification of the construct

100%

Kwiotkowska A.

Organizacja i Zarządzanie : kwartalnik naukowy

|

2018

|

tom nr 3

69--80

EN

There is no set of constructs or measurement tools in the subject literature that would be widely accepted. In this paper three dimensions of the organisation’s environment namely dynamism, hostility, and complexity, were reviewed. These dimensions are common to most environment research but, especially on the native background, only a few researchers have attempted to synthesize these dimensions in the one research approach. The aim of the paper is synthesis of three dimensions of the organisation’s environment and an empirical verification of whether the existing business practice dimensions of the organisation’s environment correspond to the dimensions laid down and proposed on the theoretical level. In the paper, three dimensions of the organisation’s environment - dynamism, hostility, and complexity were characterised, a research tool developed for measuring them was presented. The approach uses data from a sample of fifty-three new technology-based firms in Poland. Factor analysis was used to explore the viability of these environmental dimensions. The results of the conducted research indicate that the organisation’s environment is a multidimensional construct and could be described by dynamism, hostility and complexity.

5

The Foundations of the Human Person’s Dynamism in Karol Wojtyła’s Anthropology. A Study in Light of “The Acting Person”

80%

Duma T.

Verbum Vitae

|

2020

|

tom 38

|

nr 2

PL

In traditional anthropology, the problem of the dynamism of the human being was explained by means of human faculties that were seen as distinct from one another on the basis of the activities of man. Having accepted that the traditional approach is well-known and thoroughly elaborated, Karol Wojtyła proposed a complementary approach, enhancing the classical explanation of human dynamism by following the basic intuition of the person who reveals himself in action. In this article, through several steps, the author presents the framework of the basic thesis of Karol Wojtyła's anthropology, which claims that the action performed by man includes the truth about not only his personal dynamism, but also the very subject of that dynamism itself, that is, the human person. The author shows Wojtyła's stance beginning with the distinction of personal action made against the background of other forms of human dynamism. Then, he describes Wojtyła’s methods of explanation in reference to the Aristotelian theory of act and potency. Continuing, he analyzes the problem of causativeness of action, which will turn out to be crucial for understanding man as a person. Finally, he sketches Wojtyla's conception of the fulfillment of man through his action.

6

Różnorodność panteizmu

80%

Dobieszewski J.

Edukacja Filozoficzna

|

2019

|

nr 68

69-81

PL

W artykule zaprezentowano konsekwencje różnorodności stanowisk określanych mianem panteizmu oraz różnych momentów tego złożonego pojęcia. Wskazuje się, że z jednej strony mogą one wprawiać w zakłopotanie i dezorientację, z drugiej zaś zaświadczają one o ogromnym bogactwie problemowym, intelektualnym, duchowym (religijnym) związanym z tym pojęciem. Panteizm ukazano tu jako pogląd pełen wewnętrznych treści i inspirujących napięć, przeciwstawiany uboższym i jednostronnym raczej: ateizmowi i teizmowi (a w każdym razie mającym tendencję do zubażania i ujednostronniania się, tendencję silniejszą niż panteizm). Wśród konkluzji zaproponowano tezę, według której panteizm działby się między ateizmem a teizmem, niejako przekraczałby ich – z jego punktu widzenia – dogmatyczną „sztywność” oraz upraszczającą jednoznaczność i jednostronność. Prezentuje się też panteizm jako wyraz przekonania, że świat (w swej doczesności, naturalności) nie wystarcza sobie, ale że i Bóg nie wystarcza sobie (w swej „wyjściowości”, istotowości, statyczności, w swej naturze) dla pełni swej boskości. W tym kontekście za rozczarowujące uznaje się stwierdzenie w sprawie panteizmu wyrażone przez autorów słynnego Małego słownika teologicznego.

EN

This article presents the consequences of the diversity of positions called pantheism and the different moments of this complex concept. It is pointed out that on the one hand they can confuse, on the other hand they testify to the huge problematic, intellectual, spiritual (religious) wealth associated with this concept. Pantheism is shown here as a view full of internal content and inspirational tensions, contrasted with the poorer and one-sided rather: atheism and theism (or at least tend to impoverish and unify, stronger than pantheism). Among the conclusions, a thesis was proposed, according to which pantheism would operate between atheism and theism, somehow exceeding them – from his point of view – dogmatic „rigidity” and simplifying uniqueness and one-sidedness. Pantheism is also presented as an expression of the belief that the world (in its temporality, naturalness) is not enough for itself, but that also God is not enough (in its „exit”, essence, static, in its nature) for the fullness of its divinity.

7

„Dziecko nie [...] młodych rodziców”. Świat postaw i wartości Janusza Stanisława Pasierba w okresie do 1947 roku

60%

Koprowski P.

Język - Szkoła - Religia

|

2013

|

tom 8

|

nr 2

157-173

EN

The article presents the world of attitudes and values of Janusz Stanisław Pasierb (1929-1993), future philosopher, art historian and poet, who during childhood and adolescence emerged within the space of his family home. This young man in this period acquired a peculiar, internal order, with help of his relatives and closest friends he „worked out” a set of ideas that became both a tool used to „control” the desintegration of the war in 1939-1945, and something that defined his identity. Final turning point of this very important stage in the life the author of Czas otwarty was the year 1947, when he joined the Seminary in Pelplin. Stay in the seminar caused problematic aspects of subjectivity, previously mentioned by the young artist, to obtain a remarkable dynamism that abstracts from the elements of „externality”, characteristic for the occupation period, as well as the great depth of meanings.

8

Człowiek jako dynamiczna jednostka duchowo-cielesna w nauczaniu św. Maksyma Wyznawcy

60%

Kashchuk O.

Vox Patrum

|

2015

|

tom 64

205-230

EN

In St. Maximus the Confessor’s teaching human nature consists of the soul and the body, in which logos of power that unifies them together is inscribed. Human nature manifests itself in the individual human being. The human being as the body and the soul naturally longs for God. This longing is fulfilled by the movement, which is connected to dynamism of the entire human structure. The dynamism is inscribed in the mind, reason, spirit, will, sense, passionate powers and body. The dynamic aspiration for God does not imply getting rid of any of the human elements, even passionate and bodily, but on the contrary, it demands appreciation and proper use of all the natural powers of the human being. Maximus the Confessor treats the human being as a whole. The human is not only mind, reason and spirit, but also will, sense, passionate powers and body. The dynamism of mental and spiritual sphere should be extended in the senses, passionate powers and body, so that the body also becomes the source of virtues, and is deified together with the soul through unity with the Absolute. This unity as the goal of human longing will never be static, but dynamic, because the fulfillment of this longing is the state with eternal movement. So human being will constantly strive for even more perfect unity with God. Through this unity the human being becomes more human. The originality of the Author consists in the fact that using the anthropological views of the earlier tradition and interpreting them mystically and symbolically, he intertwined the entire dynamism of human being with the structure of the Platonic world. The human being through the longing for God and through the proper use of natural powers mystically unites with God not only himself/herself, but also the entire universe, because the structure of the human being is analogous to the structure of the universe.