PL
 |
EN
Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 2

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  being situated
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available Egzystencja oraz analiza. Nowa Fenomenologia jako trzecia droga filozofii europejskiej
100%
Przyłębski A.
Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne
|
2011
|
nr 15
27- 43
EN
The article presents the New Phenomenology of Hermann Schmitz as a third way of doing philosophy today: between the Scylla of analytical analysis of language and science and the Harybdis of quasi-metaphysical description of the reality (structuralism, new ontologies), being a kind of continuation of the speculative idealism. Based on the general idea of the descriptiv phenomenology by Edmund Husserl and critisizing the mistakes done by its initiator Hermann Schmitz proposes an attractive form of the philosophical research that situates itself far from summerizing the results of the scientific inquiry on one side and from critisizing the sciences from a “higher, metaphysical” standpoint on the other. In a kind of friendly challenge to the Fundamental Ontology Heidegger’s the New Phenomenelogy proposes an analysis of humans’s primordial experiences of the reality we are in, sharing it partially with animals. Schmitz seems to succeed in showing the point where the human experience transcendents the reality experience of the higher animals, which is an interesting challange to a similar attempt done by John Searle.
2
Content available remote Egzystencja oraz analiza. Nowa Fenomenologia jako trzecia droga filozofii europejskiej
100%
Przyłębski A.
Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne
|
2011
|
nr 15
27-43
EN
The article presents the New Phenomenology of Hermann Schmitz as a third way of doing philosophy today: between the Scylla of analytical analysis of language and science and the Harybdis of quasi-metaphysical description of the reality (structuralism, new ontologies), being a kind of continuation of the speculative idealism. Based on the general idea of the descriptiv phenomenology by Edmund Husserl and critisizing the mistakes done by its initiator Hermann Schmitz proposes an attractive form of the philosophical research that situates itself far from summerizing the results of the scientific inquiry on one side and from critisizing the sciences from a “higher, metaphysical” standpoint on the other. In a kind of friendly challenge to the Fundamental Ontology Heidegger’s the New Phenomenelogy proposes an analysis of humans’s primordial experiences of the reality we are in, sharing it partially with animals. Schmitz seems to succeed in showing the point where the human experience transcendents the reality experience of the higher animals, which is an interesting challange to a similar attempt done by John Searle.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.