The aim of this paper is a comparative analysis of the philosophy of Francis Herbert Bradley and the monistic philosophy of Parmenides of Elea. For many years, the general philosophical consciousness was dominated by the belief that the thought of the most important British idealist was in fact a form of Hegelianism. In this paper, I show that Bradley’s thought was actually more closely related to Eleatic philosophy than to Hegel’s philosophy. In the first part I show that both Parmenides and Bradley adopted a similar epistemological position, i.e. radical rationalism. I then point out that the monism of both Bradley and Parmenides was the most radical form of monism, which was rarely seen in the history of European philosophy. Finally, I show that both Parmenides and Bradley adopt a similar view of metaphysical idealism..
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.