Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Z prawnej problematyki nabycia służebności przesyłu przez zasiedzenie

100%

Hasińska I.

Studia Iuridica Agraria

|

2016

|

tom 14

389-400

EN

Ownership is the main property right which gives the fullest control over a thing and, simultaneously, imposes the obligation to respect that control. The situation is totally different in respect of limited property rights. The limited property rights entitle a person to exercise some rights, which are typically given to an owner, on another person’s thing. The right of transmission easement constitutes a special, separate type of easement and it limits the ownership. The introduction of that right was a legislator’s response to the postulates made by transmission entrepreneurs to regulate the use of the real estate on which distribution equipment has been or is planned to be constructed. The possibility to acquire transmission easement by acquisitive prescription still causes numerous disputes both in the doctrine and among legal practitioners. That claim raised by the entrepreneurs entails the necessity to prove that the transmission entrepreneur and their legal predecessors used another person’s real estate in exactly the same way as it would have been used by the person who is entitled to the transmission easement (from 2008) or to an easement analogical (similar) to the transmission easement (until 2008), namely by using permanent and visible facilities which in this case are designed to transmit electrical energy (energy transmission, equipment maintenance, checkups and repairs).

2

Analysis of Possible Cases of Acquisitive Prescription of Public Properties Presented on Example of Selected Area

100%

Trembecka A.

Geomatics and Environmental Engineering

|

2019

|

tom Vol. 13, no. 2

73--82

EN

The main purpose of this research paper is to analyze the conditions, extent, and reasonable grounds for the acquisitive prescription of public real properties (i.e., those owned by the state treasury and local government units), taking into account the exclusion time for public properties to be subject to the possibility of prescription. The acquisitive prescription of real properties is one of the methods used to regulate the legal status and for the owner to obtain a title of ownership for the property. The analysis was carried out on the example of the city of Krakow. This allowed me to assess the causes and effects as well as the scale of the practical implementation of this legal institution. The final results of the performed research study are proposed actions that should be taken as part of the public property management process aimed at protecting ownership rights by means of stopping the course of acquisitive prescription. The results of the research studies have proven the legitimacy of introducing legal regulations limiting the possibility of the acquisitive prescription of public properties. A comparison of the reasonable grounds and dates of the acquisitive prescription of the real properties in Poland with those in force in other countries (such as the United Kingdom and Germany) was also performed.

PL

Celem artykułu jest analiza uwarunkowań, zakresu oraz przesłanek zasiedzenia nieruchomości stanowiących własność Skarbu Państwa oraz jednostek samorządu terytorialnego z uwzględnieniem okresu wyłączenia dopuszczalności zasiedzenia nieruchomości publicznych. Zasiedzenie nieruchomości jest jednym ze sposobów regulowania stanów prawnych i uzyskiwania tytułu własności nieruchomości przez jej posiadacza. Analizę przeprowadzono na przykładzie nieruchomości z obszaru miasta Krakowa. Pozwoliła ona na ocenę przyczyn i skutków oraz skali zastosowania w praktyce tej instytucji prawnej. Końcowym efektem badań jest propozycja działań, jakie powinny być podjęte w ramach gospodarowania mieniem publicznym w celu ochrony własności przez przerwanie biegu zasiedzenia. Wyniki badań wskazują na zasadność wprowadzenia uregulowań prawnych ograniczających możliwość zasiedzenia nieruchomości publicznych. Porównano także przesłanki i terminy zasiedzenia nieruchomości w Polsce z obowiązującymi w innych krajach, tj. w Wielkiej Brytanii i Niemczech.

3

Nabycie nieruchomości rolnej w drodze zasiedzenia po zmianie Kodeksu cywilnego i ustawy o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego

84%

Michałowski R.

|

nr 2(33)

213-228

EN

The article concerns the effects of the repeal of Article 172 paragraph 3 of the Civil Code, which provided that only an individual farmer could acquire agricultural real estate by way of acquisitive prescription. The aim of the deliberations is to determine whether, following the repeal of this provision, any entity established under civil law may acquire agricultural real estate by way of acquisitive prescription, or whether acquisition of such real estate in this manner falls within the scope of Article 2a of the Act of 11 April 2003 on the shaping of the agricultural system. In conclusion, the author states that Article 2a of the said Act applies to the acquisition of agricultural real estate by way of acquisitive prescription. Therefore, in principle, agricultural real estate by way of acquisitive prescription may be acquired by an individual farmer. There are also possible some exceptions to this rule as indicated in Article 2a, paragraph 3 of the Act. Doubts, however, arise with regard to the application to acquisitive prescription of agricultural real estate.

PL

Artykuł dotyczy skutków uchylenia art. 172 § 3 Kodeksu cywilnego, który stanowił, że nabywcą nieruchomości rolnej w drodze zasiedzenia mógł być wyłącznie rolnik indywidualny. Celem rozważań jest określenie, czy w związku z uchyleniem tego przepisu każdy podmiot prawa cywilnego może nabyć przez zasiedzenie nieruchomość rolną, czy nabycie takiej nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie jest objęte zakresem zastosowania art. 2a ustawy z dnia 11 kwietnia 2003 r. o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego. W podsumowaniu autor stwierdza, że do nabycia własności nieruchomości rolnej w drodze zasiedzenia stosuje się art. 2a ustawy o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego. Dlatego zasadniczo nieruchomość rolną w drodze zasiedzenia może nabyć rolnik indywidualny. Możliwe jest również zastosowanie niektórych wyjątków od tej zasady wskazanych w art. 2a ust. 3 tej ustawy. Wątpliwości rodzi stosowanie w odniesieniu do zasiedzenia zgody na nabycie nieruchomości rolnej przewidzianej w omawianej ustawie.

4

Zasiedzenie i jego skutki z perspektywy konstytucyjnej. Rozważania w przededniu uchwały składu 7 sędziów Sądu Najwyższego (III CZP 103/22)

67%

Kućka M.

|

nr 11 (391)

11-44

EN

The article attempts to answer the question of whether the Polish statutory regulation of acquisitive prescription is compatible with the Polish Constitution. Several possible variants of the understanding of ownership under the Polish Constitution are presented. Then . taking into account the various interpretative variants . an interpretation of the statutory regulation of acquisitive prescription was made. As a result of these considerations, it is argued that acquisitive prescription should take into account the interest of the previous owner and, despite the loss of title to the property, he should obtain the value of the lost right. Moreover, third party rights limiting the ownership should not be extinguished as a result of acquisitive prescription. The Polish legislator . differently than the Draft Common Frame of Reference . is silent on both issues. The inspiration for the article is the issue soon to be tackled by the Polish Supreme Court, which concerns whether, as a result of acquisitive prescription, the previous owner loses the claims to which it was entitled, for remuneration for non-contractual use of its property (inter alia against the previous holder who is the current owner of the property). Moreover, the article expresses the view that the Polish regulation on the statute of limitations of a claim for recovery of a movable thing, which the owner is entitled to against the possessor in bad faith (who, according to Polish law, cannot acquire ownership of the moveable thing by acquisitive prescription), is unconstitutional.