Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 4

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: Wojtyła

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

“Culture of the Person” and “Culture of Works” According to Karol Wojtyła

100%

Radziechowski D.

nr 1

87-100

This article presents basic features of the philosophical concept of culture in the thought of Karol Wojtyła. In particular, it aims to highlight the distinction between the “culture of the person” and “culture of works,” which seems to be fundamental for the whole anthropology and ethics of the philosopher from Wadowice.On one hand, the designators of culture are the works and creations of man, on the other hand, the value of man himself as a person, his inner life, and who he is as a man. As Wojtyła emphasized, the latter is the most internal and profound dimension of culture because it is expressed in morality. The very ability to produce certain objects or produce certain effects, e.g. a work of art or a technical device, does not determine the “culture” of its creator. The decisive factor is acting according to the criterion of moral good and evil, which shapes the personality of the creator, who he is “as a person,” and not only “as an engineer or a composer.”

Niniejszy artykuł przedstawia zasadnicze rysy filozoficznej koncepcji kultury Karola Wojtyły. Szczególnie zaś zmierza do podkreślenia rozróżnienia na „kulturę osoby” (culture of the person) i „kulturę dzieł” (culture of works), które wydaje się być fundamentalne dla całej antropologii i etyki filozofa z Wadowic.Z jednej strony desygnatami kultury są dzieła i wytwory człowieka, z drugiej – wartość samego człowieka-osoby, jego życie wewnętrzne, to, kim jest jako człowiek. To drugie znaczenie jest, jak podkreślał Wojtyła, najbardziej wewnętrznym i głębokim wymiarem kultury, gdyż wyraża się w moralności. Sama umiejętność wytwarzania określonych przedmiotów czy wywoływania określonych skutków, np. dzieło sztuki czy urządzenie techniczne, nie przesądza o „kulturze” jej twórcy. Rozstrzygające jest działanie zgodnie z kryterium dobra i zła moralnego, które kształtuje osobowość twórcy, to kim jest on „jako człowiek”, nie zaś wyłącznie „jako inżynier czy kompozytor”.

Framing Neuroethical Praxis: Wojtyła’s Metaphysical Subject and its Modernist Cartesian Variants

71%

Larrivee D. , Echarte L.

nr 1

Numerous neuroethical quandaries today mark concerns over the normative propriety of corporal intervention in the nervous system. At the center of the debates is the question of how the human subject is understood. Accounts influenced by Cartesian metaphysics separate the subject into his immaterial and material manifestations, yielding ethical approaches that devalue the body and neural architecture. Contemporary neuroscience, on the one hand, proposes that the subject is purely a physiological creation, whereas posthumanism privileges the isolated ego on the other; both, thereby, validate an arbitrary neuroethical praxis. By anchoring neuroethics in the metaphysical subject Wojtyła proposes a fundamental corrective to these metaethical approaches, and the promise of a new praxis for corporal intervention in the brain.

The Lublin Philosophical School: Achievements, Identity and Prospects

71%

Krąpiec M. A. , Maryniarczyk A. , McDonald H.

nr 4

423-441

The article is concentrated on the Lublin Philosophical School which came into being in the institutional framework of the Department of Philosophy at the Catholic University of Lublin, Poland; it describes its achievements, which took place at different stages of the School’s development, as well as the School’s new initiatives and challenges. The development of the School was connected with the involvement of new people and successive generations of new students who joined in the cultivation of realistic philosophy. One can regard the years 1950–1966 as the first stage of the School’s development, in which the School’s program was formulated. The following stages are the years 1967–1980, and 1981–2004, and the years that follow, in which new generations of students who take up inquiries in the spirit of the School’s program arrive. The article also explains the reasons why today the Lublin Philosophical School cannot be identified with the Department of Philosophy of the Catholic University of Lublin, but rather with a special style of cultivating philosophy.

Thomistic Personalism as the Key to Understanding Human Altruism

57%

Ezewoko I. C.

nr 3

547-567

In this paper, the author attempts to explain human altruism within the framework of Thomistic personalism. He claims that (1) Thomistic personalism provides the necessary tools for understanding the human being as person in relation to other persons, and (2) it makes it possible to see the differences between personal and non-personal forms of human dynamism, which, when disregarded, easily lead to confusion. He concludes that, as an extention of love, altruism belongs to the personal, and, consequently, there is an intrinsic connection between personalism and altruism.