Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 12

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  WRITING
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote MIZNUTIE AUTORA A UTVÁRANIE VÝZNAMU
100%
World Literature Studies
|
2016
|
tom 8
|
nr 3
115 – 124
EN
The study is aimed at the analysis of the consequences of the disappearance of the author as a unifying principle organizing meaning and determining the interpretation of the text in the era of digital media and hypertext. It is based on the movement aimed at the displacement of the concept of the author from this dominant position, reflecting the approaches of thinkers such as U. Eco, R. Barthes and M. Foucault. These authors particularly understand the text as a space in which intertextual relations dominate and readership perception replaces the principle of the author. More than a natural extension of these considerations is the area of texts published in electronic version, which, according to J. D. Bolter, allow significantly greater fragmentation and differentiation than printed texts, which even more reinforces their perceptual aspects. Reconstruction or rather making of meaning in the process of reading is subject to certain specifics that are at the centre of our consideration because there also appears the spectre of what remained of the author, as some of his features are still present in the text. Consequently, we move to the description of double writing: writing the self and writing culture. Relying on Bolter’s as well as Foucault’s analysis, we can say that hypertext writing is an ongoing process of eclectic writing and self-publishing. It is exactly the way we acquire a new virtual identity that enables and stands in the basics of digital communities. If hypertext is a place of this constitutive practice of subjectification, this means not only a return to the origins of philosophy, that is to the practice of the care for the self, which it always has been, but also the beginning of a new era of reading, writing and thinking.
EN
To stress the idea of the Church as a community, the Second Vatican Council sometimes used the term fraternitas. It means not only a brotherly relationship among the faithful, but also the community of Christians. The very word i rst appeared in Christian Latin and in the 2nd-century translations of 'Vetus Latina', then in Tertulian's writings and, i rst of all, in Cyprian's. The bishop of Carthago used the term as the synonym of 'community' and 'church'. This way he stressed the identity of the Christian community and family-like ties among the believers. The Church is a community of brethren because everyone is a brother of Jesus Christ through the baptism and faith. Such sense of identity makes the Church the community of its members, whose relationships may be compared to those in a family.
EN
In the 21st century historiography remains epistemologically diverse like no other discipline in the social sciences and humanities. Theoretically uninformed, often nationalist, and objectivist (reconstructionist) narrative historians coexist with constructionist and deconstructionist historians who work with social theories and conduct critical analyses within the same institutional frames of regional or national historiographies. In spite of decades of intense plausible criticism – at least in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe – the national/nationalist history writing based on rather naïve objectivist epistemology remains influential and forms an important, if not dominant, part of the respective national historiographies. The present paper suggests that there are several factors in the lasting reproduction and even thriving of the obsolete epistemological positions that traditional, narrative national/nationalist historiographies are based on. These might be categorized as cognitive, social, and institutional in their nature. The paper analyses particularly the social purpose of knowledge about the past and the social functions of institutionalized professional history writing. National histories play an important part in the politics of memory and identity; they provide a historical dimension to the ideal national community, they also serve as legitimizing or delegitimizing narratives – these functionalities require a strongly objectivist epistemology. In fact, the epistemological points of departure of the traditional narrative national/nationalist historians are very similar to the intuitive “pre-cognitive” theories of the past shared by most ordinary people. Both are based on the idea that the past can be narrated in a form of one true story. The paper comes to the conclusion that historiographies – at least in the Central and Eastern European countries – are formatively influenced by social determinants coming from outside the discipline to much larger extent that most of the historians are ready to admit.
EN
In my article I consider deconstruction as a philosophical strategy. The problems which arise with the explication of what deconstruction might be result from the fact that deconstruction escapes full conceptualization and does not allow itself to be presented as a philosophical method. Such resistance does not mean that we cannot recognize manifestations of deconstruction in the body of a text whose structural incoherence will not allow us to recover one rightful meaning, since every text is constantly in deconstruction, opening itself to innumerable interpretations. Therefore, deconstruction is something that one cannot control, but at the same time it makes every textual operation possible.
EN
The paper follows the current boom of using the term poetics in the humanities and gives examples mainly from the German context. With regard to this poetic turn, the author goes on to deal with new uses of the term in literary science, which are mainly related to the instrumental and technical, as well as physical and gestic aspects of literary production and their summary into a traditional set of poetic issues. The paper builds on poetic synergy of the „scenes“ of writing (R. Campe) during literary production and, in conclusion, it deals with the scenes of autobiographical writing in the literatures of Central and Eastern Europe. The concept of „poetics of preparation“ is suggested in order to characterize literary works which are oriented at aesthetic and poetic dimensions of manuscripts. In the author´s opinion, distinct poetics can be typically found, for instance, in small forms of the note-taking style of writing, which dominates in the field of unedited literature of the 1970s and the 1980s.
EN
The article written on two discussions of the 1980s is a commentary of the literary-historical changes in that period of time. The author using two novels by the controversial writer Rudolf Sloboda tries to show how critics of the 1980s dealt with their presence in literature. The 1980s were the natural backgrounds for the problem. It is also important to realize how ambiguous they were. What is interesting in this context is the unstated presence of the notions author, subject, author´s subjectivity, authenticity and autobiography in the discussions about Sloboda´s writings. There, in two of the discussions appear names which represent rigid or more moderate criticism. At the same time, they are the accurate reflection of the literary criticism in the 1980s ranging from censorship to self-censorships methods.
7
Content available remote STOPY AUTOBIOGRAFIE VO FIKCII (AUTENTICKOSŤ DIELA DOMINIKA TATARKU)
75%
EN
The article considers selected “autobiographical” works by Dominik Tatarka and his fiction with autobiographical elements. As a typical modernist author, Tatarka focuses on the personal experience of the authorial subject. However, the writing is ambiguous and often contradictory in factual information. Comparisons with memoirs by his contemporaries clearly document Tatarka ś strategic shift from autobiography to creative fiction. In thinking about “autobiography-auto-fiction-fictional (novelistic) discourse”, that is not at stake just the type of theory that deals with the category of the author, but also the type of interpretation that the interpreter will accept and put to practice. We are dealing not only with a stereotypical distinction between post-structural and hermeneutic approaches of the interpreter, but with the finer differentiation of the multiple roles of the author. We are dealing with the relationship of the author – text, the text as the basis of interpretation, as the platform of the author, as the mirror of the author, the text with an evident stamp of the author. We are dealing with autobiography as a fiction (focus on the self – self-exhibition – brings with it a shift from own biography – in memories – to a desired image of oneself, a shift that is however difficult to identify).
EN
This article depicts the communication between orality and writing in the field of electronic media. In this area the borderlines between them appear to be unclear and these language forms are combined and mixed up. The analysis describes also other relevant opposition factors influencing communication and texts that were presented by J. Findra (2009, p 12) namely oral vs. written, official vs. non-official, public vs. private, prepared vs. non-prepared, monological vs. dialogical. Medial hybridity is present in the mixed codes used within one platform. Features exclusively characteristic for orality in the past are nowadays present in writing as well.
EN
The article introduces handwritten signature as a sort of performative. Contrary to the theory of speech acts, the author proposes to grasp it not as a speech act, but as a writing act inspired by Derrida’s deconstructive conception of parasitical iterability of the writing. In this perspective, the writing act is habited by an aporetical double bind, where ontologically “similar” and logically “identical” are pervading. The unsatisfiable metaphysical obligation of the civil identification via signature can be understood only thanks to the aporia of deferred meaning, where the only original is actually the deferral. As the analysis of the well-known polemics between Derrida and Searle shows, the deconstructed writing produces writing acts as parasitical performatives, which are far from communicational, citation and identification claim of Searle’s conception of speech acts. Finally, the article proposes a new revision of the differences in performative conception of sign in Austin, Searle, Derrida and Ronell.
EN
Writing is often considered secondary to the spoken language, as it is only coded sound-by-sound. But other scholars have demonstrated that writing is similar to ‘arithmetic’: a cognitive structuring, a shift to the meta-level (‘for the eye’). Handwriting (referred to here as the cursive writing in the sense of joined up handwriting, of ‘écriture liée’) differs from writing (in the first analysis): it has its own grammar composed of paradigmatic gestemes and tracemes and its own syntagmatic rules that connect them. In emotional terms, handwriting is designed to provide a special pleasure by its own drive (instinct, ‘Trieb’). But there is also cognitive aspect to it: the rapidity and fluidity of a cursive writing could be (in professional writing, for instance) more important (at the climax of the creative process) than it being legible for all eternity. The project of the new handwriting reform for Czech schools, abolishing the liaison between letters, is shown to be a modern and technically simplified form of calligraphy.
EN
This article deals with Czech and Slovak unofficial autobiographical writings (diaries, private letters, notebooks and samizdat sheets) from the normalisation period of the 1970s and 1980s. The author focuses on works by authors such as Ivan Diviš, Ivan Kadlečík, Dominik Tatarka, Ludvík Vaculík a Jan Zábrana and argues that they contribute to a dissident culture of short forms, which was typical for the literature of late socialism in Eastern Europe. Analysing their reflections and meta-reflections on the act of writing, as well as on writing materials, instruments and gestures, she comes to the conclusion that these writers thematise, problematize and make use of the same „scene of writing” (Rüdiger Campe) in their works: the scene of making notes. Defining notes not merely as products, but as a writing praxis with particular instrumental and gestural features, the author draws attention to the following five figures, which are essential for the elaborated programme of making notes: intransitivity, mobility, casualness, tentativeness and excess. In order to illustrate the „poetics of preparation” (Roland Barthes), shared and developed by the examined literary works, she uses as an example a collage by the Czech dissident and exile artist Karel Trinkewitz, in which notes and haiku poems are combined. She concludes that in the interpreted autobiographical writings the scene of making notes comes to the foreground; it is not only an object of narration, reflection and meta-reflection, but turns into a scriptural gesture of resistance towards the writing conditions in the 1970s and 1980s.
EN
The paper is concerned with the contribution of the mission of the Thessalonian brothers Constantine (Cyril) and Methodius for the Slavonic world in terms of three important points: 1) Brothers Cyril and Methodius worked in the Slavonic world as mediators of the cultural values of the Byzantine Empire. 2) They created not only a means of expression in the form of writing, but also a literary language that had not existed before. 3) They created all the conditions necessary for the free development of national Slavonic cultural life and for the formation of the self-consciousness necessary for its continuation. These three points express not only the contribution of Cyril and Methodius to the development of the culture and national consciousness of the Slavs, but also the cultural message of Byzantium to the Slavs.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.