Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Spór o rolę deputatów duchownych w Trybunale Koronnym

100%

Bednaruk W.

|

nr 1

73-85

EN

The Supreme Court came into being in 1578. The task of the court was considering the appeals from sentences passed by the lower instance. There were 27 secular judges and 6 church representatives in the court. The same amount of clergymen and secular judges reargued a case in which one of the sides was a person or an institution connected with the church. However from the very beginning parliament members spirituals had more power than they were expected to have according to the law: they took part in the election of the chairman – marshal − as well as reconsidered the cases not connected with the church, together with the secular judges, although they shouldn’t. Some nobleman did not approve that over-participation of clergyman. Therefore there was a serious dispute between the supporters and the opponents of such a strong position of clergyman in the Supreme Court. Finally, the clergymen’s influence on the court's work was diminished. It was a result of the reforms of 18th century.

2

Spór o rolę deputatów duchownych w Trybunale Koronnym

100%

Bednaruk W.

|

nr 1 Prawo

73-85

EN

The Supreme Court came into being in 1578. The task of the court was considering the appeals from sentences passed by the lower instance. There were 27 secular judges and 6 church representatives in the court. The same amount of clergymen and secular judges reargued a case in which one of the sides was a person or an institution connected with the church. However from the very beginning parliament members spirituals had more power than they were expected to have according to the law: they took part in the election of the chairman – marshal − as well as reconsidered the cases not connected with the church, together with the secular judges, although they shouldn’t. Some nobleman did not approve that over-participation of clergyman. Therefore there was a serious dispute between the supporters and the opponents of such a strong position of clergyman in the Supreme Court. Finally, the clergymen’s influence on the court's work was diminished. It was a result of the reforms of 18th century.

3

The Masovian Voivodship’s deputy sejmiks and their deputies to the Crown Tribunal in the years 1660-1700

67%

Wierzbicki L. A.

|

nr 2: „Jedno nierozdzielne i nieróżne ciało”. Studia z dziejów polsko-litewskiej Rzeczypospolitej, pod red. Artura Goszczyńskiego

133-141

EN

The deputy sejmiks were the only assemblies of the nobility that took place regularly on fixed dates. During this time, the deputy sejmiks of the Masovian Voivodship gathered in Warsaw 43 times. In the last years of the reign of John II Casimir Vasa and during the rule of King Michael I, the Masovian deputies’ election were ended successfully, but in the final period of the reign of John III Sobieski and at the beginning of the reign of Augustus II the Strong, at least seven deputy sejmiks were dissolved. The Masovian nobility was entitled to elect two representatives to the Crown Tribunal. It was much harder to obtain the function of a tribunal judge at the deputy sejmiks in Warsaw than to get a deputy mandate at the pre-parliamentary sejmiks in one of the ten territories there. We know the names of 35 Masovian deputies who sat in the Crown Tribunal with two of them serving as tribunal marshals (Hieronim Petrykowski and Jan Szydłowski). Among the families whose members were represented at the highest court of nobility in the years 1660-1700, the Lasocki house stands out because as many as five representatives of this family obtained a place in the Crown Tribunal.

PL

Sejmiki deputackie były jedynymi zgromadzeniami szlacheckimi, które odbywały się regularnie w stałych terminach. W omawianym okresie sejmiki deputackie województwa mazowieckiego zebrały się w Warszawie 43 razy. W ostatnich latach panowania Jana Kazimierza i za rządów Michała Korybuta Wiśniowieckiego elekcje deputatów mazowieckich kończyły się pomyślnie, ale w końcowym okresie rządów Jana III Sobieskiego i na początku panowania Augusta II Mocnego, co najmniej siedem sejmików deputackich zostało zerwanych. Szlachta mazowiecka wybierała jedynie dwóch swoich przedstawicieli na Trybunał Koronny. Znacznie trudniej było uzyskać funkcję sędziego trybunalskiego na sejmiku deputackim w Warszawie, niż zdobyć mandat poselski na sejmiku przedsejmowym w jednej z tamtejszych dziesięciu ziem. Znamy nazwiska 35 deputatów mazowieckich, którzy zasiadali w Trybunale Koronnym, a dwóch z nich pełniło funkcję marszałka trybunalskiego (Hieronim Petrykowski i Jan Szydłowski). Z grona rodów, które w latach 1660-1700 miały swoich sędziów w najwyższym sądzie szlacheckim, wyróżnia się rodzina Lasockich, gdyż aż pięciu przedstawicieli tej rodziny uzyskało wówczas miejsce w Trybunale Koronnym.

RU

Региональные депутатские сеймы были шляхетскими собраниями, которые проводились регулярно и в указанные сроки. В этот период депутатские сеймики Мазовецкого воеводства собирались в Варшаве 43 раза. В последние годы правления Яна Казимежа и во время правления Михаила Корибута Вишневецкого выборы Мазовецких депутатов проходили успешно, но в последний период правления Яна III Собеского и в начале правления Августа II Сильного были сорваны не менее семь депутатских сеймиков. Мазовецкая шляхта выбирала только двух представителей для Коронного трибунала. Гораздо сложнее было получить должность судьи трибунала на депутатском сеймике в Варшаве, чем получить должность посла на сейм из одной из десяти земель. Нам известны имена 35 Мазовецких депутатов, которые заседали в Королевском трибунале, и двое из них были маршалами Трибунала (Иероним Петриковски и Ян Шидловски). Среди семей, из которых происходили судья, выделяется семья Лясоких, членов которой, в этом самом высоком шляхетском суде, в 1660–1700 годах, было даже пятеро.