Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 9

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  SLOVAK HISTORY
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article discusses the research of personality of János Esterházy in cooperation of Slovak and Hungarian historians. It provides information on new documents to this issue in the Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic and in the Slovak National Archive in Bratislava.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2023
|
tom 58
|
nr 2
391 - 410
EN
The study deals with the issue of the Slovak national and state myth. It examines the genesis of these myths and their formation in the different historical conditions throughout history. The Slovak national and state myth was influenced by the cultural and civilizational factors of the territory inhabited by the Slovaks, interaction with other nations, social and political conditions. The Slovak national and state myth was born and matured gradually from the 17th century onwards as an expression of the collective identity of the Slovaks as nobility and later as a nation in the struggle for recognition of their own equality and equivalence in historical Hungary. It grew out of the conviction of the autochthony and originality of the Slovaks and their belonging to the great Slavic nation. It followed the original oral tradition dating back to the Great Moravian period.
EN
This brief overview clearly shows that the image and position of Svatopluk in Slovak historiography is not at all ordinary or one-dimensional. Therefore, there is no point in trying to simplify and reduce it to the mere “ľudácky” or “nationalistic” concept from WWII Slovakia, or to one equestrian statue at Bratislava castle. This article aims to outline the rather obvious direct proportion between the national-emancipatory and state ambitions of Slovaks and the number of historical re-examinations and updates of Svatopluk’s interpretation. But more than that, it aims to highlight the universalistic character of Svatopluk. It definitely does not intend to question the internal coherence of the tradition of Slovaks as “the people of Svatopluk” Cosma of Prague writes metaphorically about in the first part of The Nitra Legend of Svatopluk known as Sicut vulgo dicitur, i.e. “As it is commonly said” at the beginning of the 12th century. After all, this legend clearly has Svatopluk not dying, but “disappearing amid his [Nitrian] folk.”
4
Content available remote METAPHORS AND HISTORY IN SLOVAK DOKUMENTARY
100%
EN
According to Lakoff’s and Johnson’s theory of conceptual metaphors, metaphors provide a partial understanding of one kind of experience in terms of another kind of experience. Therefore they help us to understand our present and/or our past reality. In his Metahistory, Hayden White states historians often approach their topic topologically pre-figuring it. By choosing a predominant trope they see history through, they choose also the genre for their writing. Referring to these works on tropes, we study several creative methods that appear in contemporary Slovak historical documentary. From “cans of time”, a metaphorical concept of cinematographic memories, presented by Marek Šulík, through the oeuvre of Peter Kerekes in which the metaphor is used as an element of structure, to debuting Anabela Žigová or Vladislava Plančíková who use metaphors to reflect on historical research, Slovak authorial documentaries represent a very inspiring metahistorical material.
EN
Slovak history and the history of the territory of Slovakia are not frequent themes in Austrian historiography. They have appeared only marginally and especially as part of the history of the Kingdom of Hungary up to 1918 or as part of the history of Czechoslovakia after 1918. This was a result of various factors. One of them was the fact that the destiny of the Slovaks and Austria were connected only with mediation. Only a few Austrian historians were concerned with the history of Slovakia before Slovakia became independent in 1993. In spite of this, we can say that notable authors such as Kurt Wessely, Helmut Slapnicka and Ludwig von Gogolák have written about the Slovaks, while Richard G. Plaschka and Horst Haselsteiner have not avoided them. The formation of a new state close to Austria reminded the Austrian public that Slovaks as well as Czechs lived in former Czechoslovakia. Slovakia and its history became more frequent subjects in Austria at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st century. Cooperation between the academic institutions of the two countries also supported this. Thanks to this, various Austrian – Slovak projects have started. The Österreichisches Ost- und Südost-europa-Institut in Vienna and its director Arnold Suppen have played an important role in this. Other Austrian researchers, such as Karl Schwarz, Valeria Heuberger, Friedrich Gottas, Valter Lukan, Thoma Kletečka, Martin Seger, Helmut Rumpler and Peter Jordan, began to research the history of Slovakia. Arnold Suppan, Karl Schwarz, Harald Heppner and others stood at the birth of Slovak – Austrian academic publications, which brought the great university centres: Vienna University, Karl Franz University in Graz, Klagenfurt University and others into research and promotion of Slovak history. At the beginning of the 21st century, Slovakia and its history has already become a lively part of Austrian historiography.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2009
|
tom 44
|
nr 2
97-105
EN
The paper is an attempt to describe and explain the tradition of Cyril and Methodius in the arguments of major social structures, representatives of these structures or important figures in Slovak history.
EN
In the first half of the nineteenth century, intellectuals from northern Hungary usually believed in a single Slavic nation speaking a single language. They imagined Slovaks not as a nation but as a “tribe” of the Slavic nation, and Slovak as a “dialect” or even a “subdialect” of the Slavic language. Modern historians and linguists, however, are so extraordinarily unwilling to acknowledge nineteenth-century Panslavism that many falsify primary source quotations, particularly as concerns the language/dialect dichotomy which features prominently in Panslav linguistic thought: where historical actors refer to a “dialect”, modern scholars substitute the term “language”. The end result is to transform Panslavs into particularist Slovak nationalists. This paper documents the Panslavism of Jan Kollár and Ľudovít Štúr, documents the misrepresentation of their ideas in recent historiography, and speculates why so many scholars refuse to acknowledge past Panslavism.
8
Content available remote PRIRODZENÉ A UMELÉ AUTORSKÉ NÁVRATY K SLOVENSKEJ HISTÓRII
88%
|
|
tom 59
|
nr 4
310 – 324
EN
Documentary drama does not have a real tradition in Slovakia. Many plays from the socialist times deformed reality to back up ideology. New tendencies, which tried to describe the history realistically, came only slowly. After 1989 we even talk about the stagnation or crisis of Slovak theatre. The theatre lost the contact with political life and lived off the entertaining function. As a paradox, in the new millennium it is young playwrights and directors, who decided to turn back to history and depict historical figures (artistic or political) or historical events. The paper will bring case studies from the point of a spectator / theatre critic on the topic that is brought on stage in contemporary Slovak theatre and how the creators deal with it in terms of preparation of the performance as well as the final perception by the audience. As the „case study“ it uses four performances from regular repertory theatres in Slovakia, some of them as a result of a creative urge of the author / director, some of them as a result of institutionally initiated project.
EN
The main objective of the present study is to approach the course of retribution in the town Banská Bystrica in the period 1945 – 1947, focusing on its social aspects. In other words, we were a common man, a general member of the political organizations of the First Slovak Republic, for whom the end of the war was marked by possible imprisonment, trial and social contempt, which could have been amplified by the Communists' coming to power in 1948. By analysing the investigation and judicial files of the local of the People's Court in Banská Bystrica, we tried to create the most objective picture of the course of retribution in the city, summarizing our results and using the analytical and comparative method to evaluate the results of our research.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.