Public service is characterized by a number of restrictions. A police officer must submit to a special type of regime resulting from the character of the service he performs. He is obliged to perform binding orders and service commands issued by his superior. Non-performance or improper performance of orders and service commands may cause consequences of a service nature, i.e. disciplinary liability. Establishing during disciplinary proceedings that a police officer has violated service discipline or has not followed the rules of professional ethics may result in them being subjected to disciplinary punishment. However, there are also other consequences that may cause a violation of service discipline or non-compliance with the rules of professional ethics confirmed in the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings. One of these is the necessity of reducing the annual award given to a police officer. This paper is entirely devoted to the issues related to the legal structure of reducing the annual award based on Art. 110 (5) (2) Act on the Police. This issue is of significant importance for Police authorities obliged to apply the legal provisions of service pragmatics as well as for police officers themselves because causes consequences in the financial sphere of a police officer. Violation of service discipline established in the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings is the most common reason for the need to reduce a police officer’s annual award. The application of this legal institution requires establishing that the final ruling of disciplinary proceedings confirming the violation of service discipline or non-compliance with the rules of professional ethics by a police officer exists in legal circulation. Attention is focused on the prerequisite of reducing the annual award. It is also indicated which entity is obliged to issue a decision on reducing the annual award, and procedural issues related to this institution are discussed. Discussion of this matter is preceded by a discussion of the issues related to the institution of the annual award, because such a reduction may only take place if a police officer previously obtained a right to this award.
The article is entirely devoted to the issues related to the dismission from the service in the Police based on the Art. 41 (2) (4) Act on the Police. This provision conditions the dismission of a police officer from the fact of acquiring the right to a pension due to reaching 30 years of retirement service. Therefore, the prerequisite for the application of this legal ground for dismission from service was discussed. However, the decision in this respect is of a discretionary nature. Thus, it requires taking into account both the public interest and the legitimate interest of the party. Therefore, the limit of administrative discretion justifying the decision to dismiss on this legal ground was indicated.
PL
Niniejszy artykuł został w całości poświęcony problematyce zwolnienia ze służby na podstawie art. 41 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy o Policji. Przepis ten warunkuje zwolnienie policjanta od faktu nabycia przez niego prawa do emerytury z tytułu osiągnięcia 30 lat wysługi emerytalnej. Omówiono zatem przesłankę umożliwiającą zastosowanie tej podstawy zwolnienia ze służby. Decyzja w tym zakresie ma jednak charakter uznaniowy. Wymaga zatem uwzględnienia zarówno interesu społecznego, jak i słusznego interesu strony. Wskazano wobec tego na granicę uznania administracyjnego uzasadniającego podjęcie decyzji o zwolnieniu na tej podstawie prawnej.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.