Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Le nouveau Code Pénal

100%

Andrejew I.

|

nr 15

5-14

2

Opinia prawna na temat zmiany ustawy – Kodeks karny

63%

Sakowicz A.

|

nr 4(36)

181-190

EN

The author argues that the proposed provisions of Article 126c of the Penal Code – inasmuch as it penalizes the person who publicly and contrary to facts denies the crimes of genocide – should be assessed negatively. The expert points out that the content of the above-mentioned provisions is partly covered by personal and material scope of regulation of the current provisions of Article 55 of the Act on the Institute of National Remembrance as it concerns the denial of the crime against peace, humanity. He also claims that the proposed provisions concerning the offence of negationism, by making reference to “act of genocide” (whose elements are specified in Article 118 of the Penal Code), provides for too broad scope of penalization.

3

Les principes de la responsabilité pénale d'après le nouveau Code pénal de la République Populaire de Pologne

51%

Wolter W.

|

nr 15

15-25

4

Karta ewidencyjna zabytku – aspekty prawne

51%

Gabler D.

|

2012

|

tom 57

|

nr 1-2

293-303

EN

There is a growing interest among amateur searchers in documents from the Archaeological Map of Poland (Archeologiczne Zdjęcie Polski) collection, containing data from architectural and construction monument record sheets. For a large group of non-professional searchers, the data brings valuable information on given buildings, such as type, location, photographic and drawing documentation. Access to documents of this kind can facilitate considerably the pursuit of individual searching/collecting passions, although not always with a noble purpose in mind. Recognizing this possibility, searchers have stepped up efforts to procure legally information of interest to them. The present article attempts to determine in practice whether it is possible and in what way to counteract such claims in the light of the legal provisions currently in force in Poland and in referrence to judiciary doctrine and judicature.

5

Uwagi o przestępstwie uprzywilejowanym z perspektywy dzieciobójstwa

44%

Brzezińska J.

|

tom 29

15 - 30

EN

The introductory part of the article describes the dogmatic structure of offences treated less severely than the corresponding standard offences. The description was then collated with the analysis of Article 149 of the Penal Code which classifies the crime of infanticide. As aresult, it has been established that the legislator provides for only one basis for treating infanticide as an offence treated less severely. The basis in question, concerning the mother’s emotional disturbance as aconsequence of labour, has not been defined precisely enough. This is due to the fact that there is no empirical research unambiguously confirming the assumption that labour has apathological impact on the psyche of a woman. Thus, the structure of Article 149 of the Penal Code in its current form does not reflect the actual causes of aperpetrator’s criminogenic activity and it is necessary to determine the real basis for treating infanticide as an offence treated less severely than the corresponding standard offence.

6

AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE 209 OF THE PENAL CODE - LEGAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS

44%

Olek I.

|

tom 135(3)

244-256

EN

This article considers the legal and practical aspects of the amendment to Article 209 of the Penal Code, which provides for liability for evading maintenance obligations, determined by the number of court orders, settlements and other agreements. The necessity to change the regulations was justifi ed by the low recoverability of maintenance arrears and the relatively small number of indictments made against the perpetrators of these acts. The crime of not paying child maintenance is socially burdensome and generates signifi cant expenses from the state budget. The legislator, justifying the draft law, considered that its amendment would temporarily increase the burden of law enforcement, but the author cites arguments that this increase will be permanent and will affect not only the prosecutor’s offi ce and the police, but also other institutions which will be required to report information about the offender. However, for over a year after the introduction of the amendment, the authorities conducting preparatory proceedings have been overburdened. In addition, imprecise regulations are diffi cult to interpret and put into practice. The study also addresses the issues of new institutions enabling the perpetrator to avoid liability for the act committed in connection with the payment of all maintenance arrears and the current penalties, as well as the features of both the basic and qualifi ed types of the crime.

7

Przepadek w znowelizowanym kodeksie karnym

32%

Błaszczyk M.

|

tom 65

93-108

EN

Under the Act of 20 February 2015 – changing the Penal Code and some other acts, from 1 July 2015 the forfeiture has been removed from the catalogue of penalties – the art. 39 point 4 of the Penal Code was repealed – and also from the catalogue of security measures of an administrative nature – the wording of the art. 99 § 1 of the Penal Code has been changed, the art. 100 of the Penal Code has been repealed and its content has been transferred to the art. 49a of the Penal Code. Currently, the forfeiture is fully regulated in chapter Va of the Penal Code, entitled „Forfeiture and compensatory measures”. Changing the normative status of the forfeiture is not understood. I consider it as a mistake. This change was not associated with changes of the normative status of forfeiture in the Fiscal Penal Code and Code of Offences. Besides the changes concerning the status of the forfeiture which has obviously system nature under the amendment came to repeal the provisions of articles 44 § 8, 45 § 6 and art. 45 § 4 of the Penal Code. These were changes of organizational character. They were accompanied by changes in the provisions of the Executive Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, which took over the content of the repealed provisions of the Penal Code. The wording of the art. 45 § 3 of the Penal Code regulating one of the legal presumptions relating to the forfeiture of financial benefits has been changed. This has increased the warranty standard of that provision.

8

Polskie kodeksy karne okresu międzywojnia

32%

Bradliński K.

|

2018

|

tom 21

|

nr 38

EN

The lawyers of the Second Polish Republic succeeded in the codification and the unification of criminal law. The most prominent codifiers of this period were J. Makarewicz, A. Mogilnicki, and E. Krzymuski. The Penal Code of 1932, created by those prominent lawyers, is considered to be very polished and detailed to this day. Even the Military Penal Codes of 1919, 1928 and 1932 laid the foundations for the subsequent regulation of this branch of law.

PL

Prawnicy II Rzeczypospolitej odnieśli sukces w zakresie kodyfikacji prawa karnego, unifikując przepisy na terenie całego kraju. Wybitnymi kodyfikatorami tego okresu byli m.in. J. Makarewicz, W. Makowski, E.S. Rappaport, A. Mogilnicki czy E. Krzymuski. Stworzony przez nich kodeks karny z 1932 r. do dzisiaj jest stawiany za wzór sztuki prawotwórczej. Również kodeksy karne wojskowe (1919, 1928, 1932) położyły podwaliny pod późniejsze uregulowanie tej gałęzi prawa.

9

Manipulacja licznikiem kilometrów pojazdu mechanicznego - nowe przestępstwo w Kodeksie karnym

23%

Maciocha A.

|

tom Nr 4

31--40

PL

Artykuł porusza problematykę zmian wprowadzonych do Kodeksu karnego ustawą z dnia 15 marca 2019 r. o zmianie ustawy - Prawo o ruchu drogowym oraz ustawy - Kodeks karny (Dz. U. z 2019 r., poz. 870), związanych z penalizacją zachowania polegającego na cofnięciu w pojeździe wskazań licznika kilometrów. Szczególną uwagę autorka poświęca analizie znamion tego przestępstwa oraz omówieniu zmian w prawie o ruchu drogowym, które są związane z wprowadzeniem do Kodeksu karnego nowego przestępstwa przeciwko interesom majątkowym w obrocie cywilnoprawnym. Autorka odniosła się również do poprzednio obowiązującego stanu prawnego, w którym zachowanie polegające na cofaniu drogomierza wypełniało znamiona oszustwa z art. 286 § 1 k.k.

EN

The article concerns the changes introduced to the Penal Code under the Act of 15 March 2019 amending the Road Traffic Act and the Penal Code Act (Journal of Laws of 10 May 2019, item 870) in connection with the penalisation of rewinding of the odometer readings in the vehicle. The author devotes special attention to the analysis of the features of this crime and discusses the changes in the traffic law, related to the introduction of a new crime against property interests in civil law transactions in the Penal Code. The author also refers to the previously binding legal status, in which the rewinding of the odometer fulfilled the features of fraud under art. 286 § 1 k.k.

10

Reforma czy rewolucja? Nowy kształt środków zabezpieczających

20%

Kładoczny P.

|

tom 65

175-188

EN

The Act of 20 February 2015 amending the Penal Code and certain other acts introduced a completely new model of protective measures (środki zabezpieczające). The article contains a critical analysis of the principles that lay at the foundation of the legislator’s move to create the current solutions, namely wide application of non-custodial protective measures, execution of those measures only after the execution of the imprisonment sentence and application of protective measures to convicts sentenced to non-custodial punishment. The author also analyses the consequences of applying these principles in particular provisions and the controversy concerning the compliance of the new normative solutions with the Constitution. The author also points to the doubts whether the advantages of extending the application of protective measures will balance the weakening of the guaranteeing function of criminal law.