Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych:  POLITICIANS
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Low trust to politicians, political and public institutions in Ukraine is a widely discussed problem. Basing on comparative data that came from Hungary, Poland and Russia, the authoress explores the reasons of cross-national similarities and differences in the level of trust. Results show that low trust to some institutions (like Parliament) and high trust to others (like Church and Army) is rather a common feature of post-communist countries that can be taken either as a proof of cultural as well as institutional theory of trust.
EN
Political history has been frequently used by politicians in the political sphere since 1989. This is not only connected with the winning support for political parties, but also with coming to terms with history. The politicians express their views on political history without regard for their knowledge of particular events, and they appeal to historical facts to justify political demands. They regard it as a “soft way” of achieving specific political aims.
EN
Executing the paragraph about accepting or rejecting the Council’s report. The National Broadcasting Council is the organ appointed to oversee the media’s area in Poland. This is the independent body. However, the Council bears responsibility before the Sejm, the Senate and the President. Every year the Council submits to the Sejm, the Senate and the President an annual report on its activities during the preceding year. Members of Parliament and senators vote for accepting or rejecting this document. If both the Sejm and the Senate reject the Council’s report and the President approves the rejection of this document, the term of office of the Council expires. The paper shows, how the paragraph about responsibility of the Council before the Sejm, the Senate and the President was executed during 17 years the existence of the body. This paper presents decisions of the Sejm and the Senate concerning accepting or rejecting Council’s reports in respective years, an analysis of parliamentary debates, reproofs contained in regulations about accepting or rejecting Council’s reports for a given period of time. The last part of the paper includes the analysis of the situation in 2010, when for the first time in the history of the Council both the parliament and the President decided that this organ would be dissolved. The responsibility of The National Broadcasting Council before the parliament and the President. Executing the paragraph about accepting or rejecting the Council’s report.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.