Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

SÚČASNÉ PODOBY LITERÁRNEJ CENZÚRY V EGYPTE

100%

Bešková K.

World Literature Studies

|

2018

|

tom 10

|

nr 4

84 – 101

EN

This essay aims to analyse various forms of literary censorship in present-day Egypt. Since the abolishment of institutional censorship of literature and the press in the 1970s, the main instruments of silencing speech that is perceived as offensive or dangerous have been the Egyptian Penal Code and blasphemy lawsuits, based on the Islamic principle calledḥisba. The paper explores the relationship between censorship and the perception of literature among the reading public. It also discusses some of the famous blasphemy trials such as the one with the academic Naṣr Abū Zayd or the writer Aḥmad Nājī.

2

Pierwszy proces przywódców Konfederacji Polski Niepodległej

88%

Borowie W.

Sowiniec

|

2010

|

nr 36-37

103-112

EN

The article presents the course of the first trial against the leaders of the Confederation of Independent Poland – the first anti-communist political party in the People's Republic of Poland, established in 1979. The trial of Leszek Moczulski, Tadeusz Stanski, Tadeusz Jandziszak and Romuald Szeremietiew, who had been arrested in the autumn of 1980, began on 15th June 1981 and lasted, with intervals, until the introduction of the martial law in the same year. The sentence was announced only in October 1982. The defendants were sentenced to a few years’ imprisonment.

3

ŽÍT SE CTÍ ANEB ÚČAST VĚRY BĚHALOVÉ NA CÍRKEVNÍM PROCESU BÁRTA A SPOL. NA POČÁTKU 50. LET 20. STOLETÍ

88%

Rodan K.

Studia Historica Nitriensia

|

2018

|

tom 22

|

nr 1

132 – 154

EN

Religious discrimination lawsuits of the late 1940s and early 1950s are one of the darkest chapters of Czechoslovak history. In the largest of these (Bárta and Comp.), the late art historian Věra Běhalová (1922–2010) was sentenced to treason and spying at the beginning of November 1952, Věra Běhalová conscientious Catholic and female employee of the French Embassy, at the request of Charles University professor Růžena Vacková, was instructed to deliver a secret correspondence and send it by diplomatic post to the capitalist countries. The seven-year sentence was served by Věra Běhalová in full across a number of Czechoslovakian prisons, including in famous Želiezovce near Nitra in Slovakia. The desire to study forced Věra Běhalová, to immigrate in October 1969 to Austria where she studied at the University of Vienna and became famous in her field. Thanks to her unfortunate fate, she worked for the Czech diaspora abroad and helped Czech students and scientists altruisticly.

4

ŽALOBA SPOLOČNÍKA V MENE SPOLOČNOSTI VOČI ŠTATUTÁRNEMU ORGÁNU (ACTIO PRO SOCIO) – DRUHÁ ČASŤ

75%

Gregorová Širicová Ľ.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

|

2016

|

tom 99

|

nr 6

501 – 524

EN

This paper is an analysis of the mechanism also known as actio pro socio (or derivative action). It is focused on the lawsuit brought by a shareholder of a corporation on its behalf to claim damages caused to the company by its director. The various names for that legal instrument, its doctrinal bases (reflective loss) and historical and comparative background are examined in the first chapter. The second chapter is focused on the conditions to bring actio pro socio according to the Slovak Commercial Code. We identified several question marks in the statutory provisions (changes in the person of the shareholder, changes in the person of the director, disposition with the claim). The third chapter deals with the effectivity of actio pro socio considering the low number of cases in the Slovak courts. Throughout the analysis we take into account the Czech recodification of private law as a possible inspiration for the readjustment of the actio pro socio in the Slovak recodification of private law.

5

ŽALOBA SPOLOČNÍKA V MENE SPOLOČNOSTI VOČI ŠTATUTÁRNEMU ORGÁNU (ACTION PRO SOCIO) – PRVÁ ČASŤ

75%

Gregorová Širicová L.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

|

2016

|

tom 99

|

nr 5

378 – 400

EN

This paper is an analysis of the mechanism also known as actio pro socio (or derivative action). It is focused on the lawsuit brought by a shareholder of a corporation on its behalf to claim damages caused to the company by its director. The various names for that legal instrument, its doctrinal bases (reflective loss) and historical and comparative background are examined in the first chapter. The second chapter is focused on the conditions to bring actio pro socio according to the Slovak Commercial Code. We identified several question marks in the statutory provisions (changes in the person of the shareholder, changes in the person of the director, disposition with the claim). The third chapter deals with the effectivity of actio pro socio considering the low number of cases in the Slovak courts. Throughout the analysis we take into account the Czech recodification of private law as a possible inspiration for the readjustment of the actio pro socio in the Slovak recodification of private law.

6

CIRKEVNÝ DESIATOK MEDZI OPÁTOM A BISKUPOM. K SPOROM O ŠOMODSKÉ DESIATKY V 13. STOROČÍ

75%

Druga M.

Konštantínove listy

|

2020

|

tom 13

|

nr 2

65 - 75

EN

The study deals with the circumstances and broader context of the comita tus Somogiensis tithe disputes between the Pannonhalma abbots and the Veszprem (to a lesser extent Zagreb) bishops in the 13th century. It introduces the circumstances of the Somogy tithe donation, which was granted to the Pannohalma Abbey by King Stephen, and the gradual legal anchoring of religious tithes in Hungarian legislation. Following the introduction of the broader context, which had helped to form the bishops’ claim for the tithes, the study proceeds to focus on the circumstances of specific court trials, then on the mechanisms of asserting and securing the bishops’ and abbots’ claims for the tithes and, finally, on the methods of solving particular disputes. The study demonstrates the wide range of ways, in which bishops and abbots prevailed in disputes. Bishop from Veszprém based his claims on the right of bishops to tithes. This right was already secured by canonic law and by the Hungarian royal laws of the kings of St. Stephen, St. Ladislav and Coloman. On the other hand, abbot from Pannonhalma monastery Urias tried to enforce his claims with the false charter of Pannonhalma abbacy and with the authority of the king St. Stephen. The study thus emphasizes the unique confrontation between bishops and abbots in the disputes over the whole comitatus tithes.