When we investigate the historicity of humans, we must inevitably address the concept of human nature, since it seems that the historicity excludes the idea of ahistorical or trans-historical human nature. In this article, the author will therefore, on the one hand, address the issue of the extent to which the consideration of human historicity can lead to questioning the concept of human nature, and, on the other hand, he will examine whether the concept of human nature has retained its meaning despite the strong criticism it has faced. In this context he will focus on the following three points: 1) he will explore the concept of human nature by examining two examples: the example of the theory of human nature, which is ahistorical, and the example in which the idea of human nature is compatible with the idea of human historicity. 2) The author will demonstrate how some anthropologists have recently questioned the paradigm of human nature. 3) He will investigate whether the concept of human nature still makes sense to us today.
2
Dostęp do pełnego tekstu na zewnętrznej witrynie WWW
The paper focuses on an analysis of the anthropological Word-Faith movement and its participation or identification doctrine which is closely connected to their understanding of redemption and human deification. A brief introduction and an overview of the current debate about the topic is also included in the analysis. The works of E. W. Kenyon, K. Hagin and K. Copeland represent the main source of material, as they all are considered the most influential representatives of this movement.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.