In this article the author shows that the understanding of free will in Bañezianism is compatible with God’s influence on human action. He also proposes modifications to selected interpretations of Bañezianism in order to render these more intelligible. This view will be presented in relation to Molinism, which proposes a different solution to the question of God’s role in human action, one that coincides with libertarianism.
The main problem of the article is the possibility of a phenomenology of praxis. The article argues that it is necessary to pose two more questions: what is human action, and how should one act? The first question can be answered within a descriptive-eidetic framework, both from a noetic and a noematic point of view. The second question requires an investigation in pure ethics and in formal axiology. Nonetheless, as the author shows, the two ethical projects need to be replaced by an ethics of love.
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.