Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Hermeneutyka jako filozofia dziejowości. Studium myśli Diltheya, Yorcka, Heideggera, Gadamera i Vattima

100%

Torzewski W. , Gadacz T.

|

tom 4

|

nr 1

173-179

2

Heidegger, Dilthey et l’histoire "religieuse" de l’herméneutique

94%

Camilleri S.

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

|

2014

|

tom 50

|

nr 1

119-171

EN

Each history of hermeneutics written since the second half of the 20th century contains a chapter on Martin Heidegger. It is often said the German philosopher revolutionized the discipline by giving existence the place long held by the text. Although this statement is widely justified, I will draw on a few pages of Heidegger’s 1923 lecture-course Ontology and compare them to Dilthey’s 1900 essay The Birth of Hermeneutics in order to support three intertwined ideas. First, Heidegger’s contribution to hermeneutics is not reducible to Being and Time but goes back to the early 1920’ and starts with radical evaluation of its history. Second, even if existence becomes the main focus point, Heidegger in no way devaluates texts. Third, authentic hermeneutics as it articulates itself in the 1927 magnum opus is made possible by the retrieval of the sacred dimension of understanding and then of “selected” religious roots of hermeneutics.

3

Pytanie o aktualność Humboldtowskiej idei uniwersytetu z perspektywy współczesnych zadań humanistyki

84%

Hanuszkiewicz W.

|

nr 3(241)

63-76

EN

The article takes up an issue of the Humboldt’s idea of university in two perspectives. In the first part of the analysis, in reference to the Max Weber’s lecture Wissenschaft als Beruf, we present the reasons for the failure of the Humboldt’s program due to the changes in the structure and function of the science, which occurred in the 19th century. In the second part, however, we depict the transformation of Humboldt’s program that was carried out by Wilhelm Dilthey. His justifying of humanities (Geisteswissenschaften) has retained, from today’s perspective, its topicality. It can be demonstrated with the aid of investigations of Jürgen Habermas, Eva Illouz and Hans Joas. Dilthey’s solutions, which continue the Humboldtian tradition, can be used to define the role and tasks of the humanities in the contemporary education model based on the idea of lifelong learning.

4

Pytanie o aktualność Humboldtowskiej idei uniwersytetu z perspektywy współczesnych zadań humanistyki

84%

Hanuszkiewicz W.

|

tom 61(3 (241))

63-77

PL

The article takes up an issue of the Humboldt’s idea of university in two perspectives. In the first part of the analysis, in reference to the Max Weber’s lecture Wissenschaft als Beruf, we present the reasons for the failure of the Humboldt’s program due to the changes in the structure and function of the science, which occurred in the 19th century. In the second part, however, we depict the transformation of Humboldt’s program that was carried out by Wilhelm Dilthey. His justifying of humanities (Geisteswissenschaften) has retained, from today’s perspective, its topicality. It can be demonstrated with the aid of investigations of Jürgen Habermas, Eva Illouz and Hans Joas. Dilthey’s solutions, which continue the Humboldtian tradition, can be used to define the role and tasks of the humanities in the contemporary education model based on the idea of lifelong learning.

5

Znaczenie wymiaru historycznego dla kształtowania się sfery geisteswissenschaften. Ujęcie Wilhelma Diltheya i Ernsta Cassirera

83%

Musioł A.

|

2016

|

tom 28/1

160-174

EN

Followers of methodological antinaturalism in philosophy, who criticise the application of methods representing the natural sciences to other realms of knowledge, argue for the necessity to separate the humanities from the empirical instrumentarium of research. The exposed dualism of investigation process reveals differences between axiomatic and deductive explanation of arguments of formal sciences and with the understanding of the humanistic interpretation and with idealizing historical and comparative analysis in the area of sciences concerning the spirit. An important contribution into historic analyses of the Geisteswissenschaften sphere came from a disciple of the Marburg Neo-Kantianism and follower of Kantian apriorism, Ernst Cassirer, and an author of the antipositivistic turn and the historical philosophy of life, Wilhelm Dilthey. Both philosophers enter into the polemics with naturalistic ideas of the man and the culture; they enter into polemic with a positivistic vision of the reality determined exclusively by physical and biological factors. In their own considerations they stress the irreducibility of the historical world to the dimension of nature. They underline the qualitative exceptionality of man as a conscious and creative (in cultural terms) individual. Taking as the point of departure the question of history, I will show dependences, collected at the perspective of the empirical (not metaphysical) ideas of the culture created by the selfconsciousness producing cultural meanings.

6

Koniec wieku poetów? O zszyciach literatury i filozofii

51%

Zawadzki A.

|

nr 37

121-144

EN

The article presents an attempt to outline, from a mainly typological and partly historical perspective, what the author considers the most important varieties of the relationship between philosophy and literature (which is, of course, understood here in a working and broad sense, as poesis). In the first of these varieties, for which the fundamental significance is Plato’s gesture of excluding poets from the state, the philosophical logos defines itself in opposition to literature, or mythos. In the second, which appears to predominate from Aristotle to the 18th century, the relationship between philosophy and literature takes on a more neutral character: the former provides the latter with motifs, themes, topics, mainly related to moral philosophy in the broadest sense, while the latter provides the former with discursive modes, such as genre. Modern aesthetics and the philosophy and theory of literature (fundamentally different from the tradition of the great poets and rhetoricians of the 16th and 17th centuries), which emerged together with transcendental philosophy and its reception in German Romanticism, contributed both to the increased interest among philosophers in literature and to a clear embedding, or even closing, of literature in philosophical notions, which originated mainly in the tradition of transcendentalism and dialectical thought. Finally, the beginning of the twentieth century is distinguished, in most of the major continental philosophical traditions, by a tendency to seek, or to find, in literature the most important partner of philosophical thinking, and sometimes even the identity of philosophy.