Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

“Etwas Fehlt”: Marxian Utopias in Bloch and Adorno

100%

Truskolaski S.

|

nr 1

EN

During a radio debate in 1964, Bloch and Adorno clashed over the status of Utopia in Marx’s thinking. In particular, the disagreement concerned the possibilities (or, rather, limitations) of picturing – with Marx and beyond Marx – a condition in which all societal antagonisms have been reconciled. It is telling, then, that their conversation quickly came to turn on a surprising term: the Old Testament interdiction against making images of God. Given both authors’ commitment to an ostensibly secular critique of capitalist modernity, the prominence of this figure, which is emblematic of the decades-long exchange between these authors, invites further questions. What, for instance, are the epistemic and aesthetic conditions under which Bloch and Adorno propose to present their Marxian Utopias? By considering these questions in light of issues arising from their debate, and applying it to their writings more generally, mypaper aims to contribute to the on-going exploration of “Utopia” in German Critical Theory.

2

K Adornově konceptualizaci sociální podstaty moderny

87%

Nový M.

|

tom 1

53-70

EN

This study explores the fundamental traits of Adorno’s conceptual understanding of modernity. In Czech sociology, there has not been a serious discussion of Adorno’s seminal oeuvre, this article aims to fill that gap. The aim is to reconstruct the very basis of Adorno’s sociological method: firstly, the essay turns its attention to the historically specific mode of subsumption of human action to the conceptual totality of class domination. In this process, an individual adopts a positive identity within which its suppressed, ontologically negative complement – its dynamic non-identity, persists. Secondly, the study deals with Adorno’s derivation of the concept of social essence. In this respect, he draws on Marx’s Capital, but Adorno’s critical reading introduces an important conceptual innovation: under the conditions of Keynesianism, Adorno challenges the validity of Marx’s theorization of law-like objectivity of value and replaces it with the concept of exchange as the universal model of social activity. However, the study argues that Adorno’s reconstruction of Marx’s critique of political economy has reified Keynesian management of the capitalist economy.

3

Schwarz und Grau hinter Weiß und Rot. Autoritäre Potenziale in der türkischen und in der polnischen Gesellschaft im Spiegel der Reportagen Bittersüße Heimat: Bericht aus dem Inneren der Türkei von Necla Kelek und Rückkehr nach Polen: Expeditionen in mein Heimatland von Emilia Smechowski

82%

Okoński K.

|

nr 2

213-231

EN

Post-)migration literature by Polish and Turkish authors in Germany is no longer an artistic elaboration of life abroad, a view of the West from an Eastern perspective or a reflection of traumas, phobias and dreams from the old homeland. More and more frequently, writers with foreign roots refer to the German past and present. Similarly to authors of Turkish origin, Polish writers and journalists living in Germany are reporting on the country of their childhood-and that is not always a sentimental view. Ideological polarization, anti-democratic tendencies, patriarchy, religious radicalism, phantom pains and longing for the imperial past, nationalism and idealization of one’s own history, division of the country into pro-Western metropolises and a conservative province form a background for the journey through the rediscovered country of origin-in Poland and in Türkiye. Emilia Smechowski’s Return to Poland: Expeditions to my home country (2019) and the report by the German-Turkish sociologist Necla Kelek Bittersweet Home: Report from the interior of Turkey (2008) form the starting point for a comparative analysis of the authoritarian potentials in both societies.

DE

(Post-)Migrationsliteratur polnischer und türkischer Autoren in Deutschland ist nicht mehr eine künstlerische Aufarbeitung des Lebens in der Fremde, ein Blick auf den Westen aus östlicher Perspektive oder ein Spiegelbild von Traumata, Phobien und Träumen aus der alten Heimat. Schriftsteller mit ausländischen Wurzeln beziehen sich in ihren Werken immer häufiger auf die deutsche Geschichte und Gegenwart. Ähnlich wie die Autoren türkischer Herkunft, berichten auch die in Deutschland lebenden polnischen Schriftsteller und Publizisten über das Land ihrer Kindheit – und das ist nicht immer ein sentimentaler Blick. Ideologische Polarisierung, antidemokratische Tendenzen, Patriarchat, religiöser Radikalismus, Phantomschmerzen und Sehnsucht nach der imperialen Vergangenheit, Nationalismus und Idealisierung der eigenen Geschichte, Teilung des Landes in prowestliche Metropolen und in eine konservative Provinz bilden einen Hintergrund für die Wanderung durch das wiederentdeckte Herkunftsland – in Polen und in der Türkei. Emilia Smechowskis Rückkehr nach Polen. Expeditionen in mein Heimatland (2019) und die Reportage der deutsch-türkischen Soziologin Necla Kelek Bittersüße Heimat: Bericht aus dem Inneren der Türkei (2008) bilden den Ausgangspunkt für eine vergleichende Analyse der autoritären Potentiale in beiden Gesellschaften.

4

Ideał wspólnoty i polityka różnicy

75%

Young I. M.

|

2010

|

tom 1

41-66

EN

brak

PL

Tekst dotyczy idei wspólnoty w filozofii dekonstrukcji i filozofii Szkoły Frankfurckiej.

5

A crítica da modernidade de Adorno, Foucault e Agamben, ou a Ideologia da separação

62%

Urbán B.

|

tom Special Issue: O mundo da literatura

39-48

EN

The article focuses on the critique of Modernity elaborated by three continental philosophers, Adorno, Foucault and Agamben. By locating a certain critical attitude towards the episteme of Modernity, present in all three of these thinkers, the author explores the ideas and the discursive steps that connect Adorno’s notion of Modernity to that of Foucault, and Foucault’s ideas to the political theory of Giorgio Agamben. What crystallises from this discursive chain connecting the oeuvres of the three thinkers, is a certain ideology of Modernity which could be called the “ideology of separation”.

6

Koniec wieku poetów? O zszyciach literatury i filozofii

44%

Zawadzki A.

|

nr 37

121-144

EN

The article presents an attempt to outline, from a mainly typological and partly historical perspective, what the author considers the most important varieties of the relationship between philosophy and literature (which is, of course, understood here in a working and broad sense, as poesis). In the first of these varieties, for which the fundamental significance is Plato’s gesture of excluding poets from the state, the philosophical logos defines itself in opposition to literature, or mythos. In the second, which appears to predominate from Aristotle to the 18th century, the relationship between philosophy and literature takes on a more neutral character: the former provides the latter with motifs, themes, topics, mainly related to moral philosophy in the broadest sense, while the latter provides the former with discursive modes, such as genre. Modern aesthetics and the philosophy and theory of literature (fundamentally different from the tradition of the great poets and rhetoricians of the 16th and 17th centuries), which emerged together with transcendental philosophy and its reception in German Romanticism, contributed both to the increased interest among philosophers in literature and to a clear embedding, or even closing, of literature in philosophical notions, which originated mainly in the tradition of transcendentalism and dialectical thought. Finally, the beginning of the twentieth century is distinguished, in most of the major continental philosophical traditions, by a tendency to seek, or to find, in literature the most important partner of philosophical thinking, and sometimes even the identity of philosophy.