Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Adam Naruszewicz’s Translation of Tacitus

100%

Bober-Jankowska M.

|

nr 5

EN

In 1772-1773 Adam Naruszewicz, one of most outstanding representatives of Polish Enlightenment, wrote the first complete translation of all Tacit’s works. The study is devoted to Naruszewicz’s translation work on the texts of Roman historian. Adam Naruszewicz translated them onto Polish and published them in three volume, entitled „All works of Kaj Kornelius Tacit. Translation of Adam Stanisław Naruszewicz S.J.”. The study presents a translation workshop of the bishop’s of Smoleńsk, with a special consideration of the description of the mechanisms governing the preparation of scientific commentaries. Previous research concerning the bishop’s commentary work did not at all raise the issue of authorship, claiming that the commentaries were written by Naruszewicz. The Smoleńsk bishop’s commentary work was assessed very highly by the critics. However, the outcome in comparative research of Naruszewicz’s translation and the bases of translations presented in this study allowed to formulate new statements according to which scientofic commentaries in Tacit’s first Polish translation betray a far-reaching, multidimensional dependence on the source of translation, which allows to set and prove the thesis that the bishop was their author.

2

Błąd czy wariant? O technikach redakcyjnych Adama Naruszewicza

89%

Bober-Jankowska M.

|

tom 26: ERRARE HUMANUM EST. BŁĘDY W BADANIACH HUMANISTYCZNYCH, ICH RODZAJE I KONSEKWENCJE

127-148

XX

The article is an introduction to the issues of Adam Naruszewicz’s editorial techniques, revealed in the preserved autographs of his literary prose and scientific works. These manuscripts are divided into texts written by Naruszewicz and those dictated and edited by him. Initial research shows that the bishop’s editorial work was done in line with the following criteria: clarity and credibility of the argument, substantive correctness, and shaping the content, the aim of which was to create a positive image of the king, Stanisław August. This often determined intervening in areas, which are difficult to be accused of being incorrect today. This is why the article attempts to indicate those editorial activities of the bishop, which could now be perceived as variants of the text, while, according to the author, they required amending. As an editor, Naruszewicz interfered with various aspects: factual errors, style, structure, punctuation, making clarifying additions, as well as self-censoring. All these editorial efforts show the literary skills of one of the most outstanding minds of Polish Enlightenment.

3

Tradycja oświecenia stanisławowskiego na łamach „Dziennika Wileńskiego” z lat 1815–1830

62%

Kowal J.

|

tom LXXI

101-119

EN

From the beginning, literature occupied an important place in “Vilnius Daily” (so-called scholar magazine’s pages). The editors of the journal (including Jan and Jędrzej Śniadecki, Euzebiusz Słowacki, Filip Nereusz Golański, Leon Borowski, Ernest Groddeck, Kazimierz Kontrym) who were recruited from the circle of the University of Vilnius are alumni in “the age of lights”. Being heirs to the enlightenment ideals of aesthetics, they appreciated the literary output of their immediate predecessors. These preferences are clearly visible in the literary content of “Vilnius Daily”’, obviously adhering to classical and sentimental tastes. Without a doubt Stanisław Trembecki enjoyed the highest popularity among the Stanislawow creators in those pages. We also encounter there the works of Elżbieta Drużbacka, Ignacy Krasicki, Franciszek Karpiński and Ludwik Kropiński. The Vilnius magazine, appreciating their creative achievements, showed thereby the continuation of eighteen-century literary tradition.

4

«Где Польша?»: Н.М. Карамзин и польский вопрос в конце XVIII – первой четверти XIX вeкa

38%

Kazakow R.

|

tom 6

93-128

EN

The article analyzes the works and individual statements of the Russian writer and historian N.M. Karamzin (1766‒1826), devoted to the relationship between Russia and Poland, the perception of poles and Poland in Russia. For the first time, Karamzin’s works and individual statements about the Polish question are collected in the fullest possible format. Karamzin’s attitude to the partitions of Poland in the context of the French revolution and the European wars of the end of the XVIII century is characterized. For the first time, some draft notes of Karamzin are published, including materials from the History of the Russian state. Karamzin’s methods of working with the works of Polish historians are analyzed.

PL

W artykule przeanalizowano zarówno dzieło, jak i indywidualne wypowiedzi rosyjskiego pisarza i historyka Nikołaja Michajłowicza Karamzina (1766‒1826), poświęcone stosunkom Rosji z Polską, a także postrzeganiu Polski i Polaków w Rosji. Jest to pierwsze takie zestawienie prac Karamzina i jego wypowiedzi na temat spraw polskich. Stosunek Karamzina do Polski scharakteryzowano w kontekście rewolucji francuskiej i wojen europejskich pod koniec XVIII wieku. W artykule po raz pierwszy opublikowane zostały notatki Karamzina, w tym materiały pochodzące z Historii państwa rosyjskiego. Analizie poddano również odbiór dzieła Karamzina przez historyków polskich.