Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.

Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Ograniczanie wyników

3 Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

Znaleziono wyników: 3

Liczba wyników na stronie

Wyniki wyszukiwania

Wyszukiwano:
w słowach kluczowych: ADMINISTRATIVE PUNISHMENT

Sortuj według:

Ogranicz wyniki do:

POTREBA PRÁVNEJ ÚPRAVY SPRÁVNEHO TRESTANIA NA PRÍKLADE ZÁSADY ZÁKAZU ZMENY K HORŠIEMU

100%

Vačok J.

nr 5

495 – 502

This contribution points out interpretation problems of present regulation of Administrative Punishment. He analyses national and international regulation especially with reference to the requirements of Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. According to the research findings, the author points out the need the comprehensive regulation of administrative punishment. He also defines the essential problems for solving before the start of the works on the new law.

RESTORATÍVNE PRVKY V SPRÁVNOM TRESTANÍ

100%

Tomaš L.

Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)

2021

tom 104

nr 2

155 – 169

The Slovak legal regulation of administrative punishment is in many respects interspersed. The means of applying elements of restorative justice are no exception. The normative diction of the law on misdemeanors, or even another regulation, hardly thinks about them. In the scientific literature to date, there have been several inspiring considerations about the possibilities of modifying this state within the processes of creating the future sanction law of public administration. However, it is not possible to limit the formulation of impulses in the de lege ferenda level, especially in the legal-application context. Administrative authorities apply the applicable law in the process of hearing administrative offenses. Therefore, attention should be paid to methods of strengthening the restorative element in administrative punishment in the light of an effective normative platform. The examination of these aspects is the subject of a translated article. The author focuses on whether the categories of the general theory of law (interpretation, the legal imperative of analogy, subsidiarity of legislation) can create space for strengthening the restorative element in administrative punishment. He examines the above, especially in the light of the possibilities of concluding a settlement on a proper tort.

INTERPRETAČNÉ NEJASNOSTI SÚVISIACE S MOŽNOSTOU UZAVRETIA ZMIERU V PRIESTUPKOVOM KONANÍ (EŠTE JEDEN PRÍSPEVOK DO DISKUSIE)

75%

Tomaš L.

nr 3

251 – 262

Slovak administrative punishment has long lacked comprehensive legal regulation, both from the point of view of substantive law and procedural law. This results in several interpretive ambiguities. One of the ambiguities in question is related to conciliation in misdemeanour proceedings. Some attention has already been paid to the issue of the possibility of conciliation in criminal proceedings in the current scientific literature. Scientific opinions on the possibilities of resolving a misdemeanour case through reconciliation, excluding the offense of defamation according to § 78 of the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 372/1990 Coll. on offenses as amended, are not uniform and differ. The aim of this contribution is to follow up on the currently produced scientific discourse in the subject area, to develop it substantively and ideologically, and to bring arguments in favour of the possibility of amicable disposal of several cases regulated by the tort law of public administration.