Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

„Alkoran“ a „Machomet“ ve staročeské literatuře mezi Husem a Kabátníkem

100%

Šimek Š.

Historie – Otázky – Problémy (History, Issues, Problems)

|

2014

|

tom 6

|

nr 2

125-137

EN

This article presents the results of an analysis of Old Czech texts from the 1410s to the 1490s in which contemporary names for the Koran and the Prophet Muhammad occur.

2

Dvůr krále Jiřího ve světle současného poznání

88%

Zilynská B.

Mediaevalia Historica Bohemica

|

2014

|

tom 17

|

nr 2

17-36

EN

The Court of King George in Light of the Current Knowledge: The paper recapitulates the state of the treatment of the sovereign court of George of Poděbrady, briefly reminds the reader which sources are available and in the end discusses the individual themes associated with the court: the prosopography of the courtiers, chancellery, celebrations and patronage. It states mainly the little treatment of the personnel composition of the court society.

3

O PLEBANACH MIEJSKIM I WIEJSKIM W UNIEJOWIE W XV WIEKU

88%

Wilk-Woś Z.

Biuletyn Uniejowski

|

2016

|

tom 5

29-40

PL

Parafia uniejowska należała do nielicznych w Polsce parafii o wieloosobowej obsadzie plebańskiej. W XV wieku w Uniejowie opiekę duszpasterską sprawowało dwóch proboszczów: pleban wiejski – wiceprepozyt oraz pleban miejski – wicearchidiakon. Celem artykułu jest przybliżenie zagadnienia wieloosobowych parafii oraz odtworzenie i scharakteryzowanie piętnastowiecznej grupy proboszczów parafii uniejowskiej. W pracy przedstawiono również kwestie regulacji majątkowych i wzajemnych relacji między plebanami uniejowskimi.

EN

In the 15th century, the Uniejów parish was one of a few parishes in Poland which had two parsons: one who took care of parishioners living in the town, and the other – of parishioners in rural areas. The paper characterizes the 15th century group of Uniejów parish priests as well as addresses a broader issue of parishes with more than one priests, including property regulations and mutual relations between the parsons.

4

Udział korektorów i zecerów w kształtowaniu tekstu drukowanego (na podstawie polskojęzycznych druków z XVI wieku)

75%

Sawa A.

Folia Bibliologica

|

2011-2012

|

tom 53-54

25-37

5

Čech mezi jinověrci aneb křesťanská propaganda pod rouškou smíření náboženství

75%

Zilynská B.

Historie – Otázky – Problémy (History, Issues, Problems)

|

2014

|

tom 6

|

nr 2

106-115

EN

This paper deals with Nicholas of Cusaʼs attitude towards Islam. It summarizes the content of his texts De pace fidei and Cribratio Alcorani, referring to the latest publication output and conference undertakings on this subject. It also recalls the background to Cusaʼs attitudes and the similar views of his contemporaries (John of Segovia). It also refers to the figure of the Czech (Bohemus) among the debaters in De pace fidei and inquires into his role in this work.

6

Katolické panstvo na dvoře Jiřího z Poděbrad. Procesy vzájemné konvergence a divergence

75%

Beran Z.

Mediaevalia Historica Bohemica

|

2014

|

tom 17

|

nr 2

37-75

EN

Catholic Lords at the Court of George of Poděbrady: A Mutual Process of Convergence and Divergence: The basic power centre was the sovereign court in the Poděbradian kingdom just like in the other medieval and modern monarchies. The court of George of Poděbrady in this study is seen from the structural-personnel perspective as the mutual ties of an arranged network of persons sharing along with the sovereign in the policy and administration of the land. The aim of the study is to capture the bilateral activity of George of Poděbrady with a group of upper aristocrats actively demonstrating their allegiance to the Roman Catholic Standard receiving Holy Communion under one species within the so-defined sovereign court. The mechanisms, which brought Catholics fully devoted to his political programme and person to the Poděbrady court, are examined in detail as well as the hidden pitfalls contained in the support of the Catholic nobility, who later abandoned George and formed a domestic opposition known as the Zelená Hora Unity. The work is structured into several mutually related levels analysing gradually the relation of estatism and confession in the Poděbrady period, the representation of the Catholics in the highest offices, their property situations, kinship ties, representation in the royal council and confrontation of the imperative of loyalty to the king and obedience to the pope. In this questioning, it is necessary to shift to the period before the royal election from March 1458 and note the early ties of George of Poděbrady with the Catholic nobility, remove the habitual evaluation leading to a condemnation of the “treacherous” Catholic nobility and simply not glorify those who remained with George of Poděbrady.

7

Świadkowie przywileju wielkiego mistrza Ulryka von Jungingen z 28 X 1409 roku. Z badań nad prokrzyżacką orientacją wśród szlachty dobrzyńskiej w okresie wojny 1409–1411

75%

Szybkowski S.

Zapiski Historyczne

|

2010

|

tom 75

|

nr 2

23-46

EN

The document of the Grand Master Ulrich von Jungingen concerning conferring Culm law on Dobrzyń Land on 28 October 1409 has already been discussed in the literature of the subject (Marian Biskup, Karol Górski). Nevertheless, the study by K. Górski was published forty years ago, and numerous studies have appeared which deal with both the Polish-Teutonic relations and the history of Dobrzyń Land. Using the sources allows us to place this increasingly interesting document in a completely new overall context. In this article we shall deal with the problem of identifying the witnesses of the privilege and we shall make an attempt to establish motives which made them support the authority of the Order in occupied Dobrzyń Land at the beginning of the war 1409–1411. This question also appears in literature (Janusz Bieniak, Beata Możejko), however accounts are scattered, which justifies the need to prepare a study of the problem in one place. The following people were involved as witnesses of the source we are interested in: Janusz and Jakub from Radzików (sons of Mikołaj from Kutno and grandsons of the Dobrzyń castellan Andrzej; Janusz – the progenitor of the magnate’s family of Kościelecki), Adam Świnka from Strzygi, Jan Świnka from Chojnowo, Adam Świnka from Sarnowo (grandsons of the Rypin castellan Piotr Świnka), Piotr from Starorypin (a descendant of the Dobrzyń pantler Eberhard and the Dobrzyń cup-bearer Mikołaj, probably a brother of the would be Dobrzyń standard-bearer Jan Rasz) and Namięta from Łapinóż (not coming from a clerical family). Six out of seven witnesses of Ulrich von Jungingen’s privilege for Dobrzyń Land of 28 October 1409 came from families belonging to the clerical noble strata. The Radzikowskis and the Świnkas belonged to outstandingly significant families (the position of the Starorypińskis was slightly lower). Only Namieta from Łapinóż came from a nonclerical noble family. The Świnkas and the Radzikowskis held the highest official positions in the Dobrzyń hierarchy during the rule of vassal princes of the Crown, and during the Teutonic lien from 1392–1405, cooperating with subsequent landlords of Dobrzyń Land, including the Teutonic Order. For this reason after Władysław Jagiełło took over the land, they were removed from their offices to which they had been appointed by Teutonic grand masters. The same happened to the Starorypińskis family. The Radzikowskis, the Świnkas and the Starorypińskis were connected with one another in family terms. They also had family connections and land in the Teutonic State. Representatives of the Radzikowskis family and the Starorypińskis family were institutionally connected with grand masters, holding from the end of the 14th century functions of diners of Konrad and later of Ulrich von Jungingen. All those factors made them support the authority of the Teutonic Order in conquered Dobrzyń Land in the autumn of 1409. Nevertheless, soon after the most outstanding witness of the Grand Master Ulrich von Jungingen’s privilege – Janusz from Radzików, Skępe and Kościelec – went over to Jagiełło’s side. He was probably influenced by the following factors: his relatives who were against his involvement in the Teutonic Order, financial corruption and hopes for further promotion prospects in the Kingdom of Poland, which were quite realistic. As far as the remaining witnesses are concerned, it is known that Jakub from Radzików supported the Teutonic Order until the end of the war (which resulted in a serious delay in his clerical career). No doubt the same situation took place in the Świnkas family (plausibly Jan from Chojnów). Their careers after the war varied. Adam Świnka from Strzygi and Zielona soon got on the right side of Władysław Jagiełło, who appointed him Dobrzyń castellan (his brother Jakub also made a clerical career), Jan from Chojnowo and Adam from Sarnowo fell victim to repression. It is not known what attitudes were adopted by Piotr from Starorypin and Namięta from Łapinóż in the later period of the war. However we know that the probable brother of Piotr – Jan Rasz – fought on the Teutonic side until the end of the military conflict of 1409–1411. None of the representatives of the Starorypińskis and heirs of Łapinóż held any offices until the end of the rule of Władysław Jagiełło.

8

Traktát o zemi svaté (1498): staročeská adaptace cestopisu norimberského měšťana Hanse Tuchera

63%

Svátek J.

Listy filologické (Folia philologica)

|

2017

|

tom 140

|

nr 1-2

91-141

EN

Treatise on the Holy Land (Traktát o zemi svaté), printed by Mikuláš Bakalář of Pilsen in 1498, belongs to the oldest travelogues written in Czech. Up to now, the text has been considered by scholars as a shortened translation of Bernhard of Breydenbachís bestseller Peregrinatio ad Terram sanctam from 1486. Comparing the Czech text with another German travelogue Die Reise ins gelobte Land, written by the Nuremberg merchant Hans Tucher senior in 1482, the article demonstrates that the Czech incunable was directly translated from this source. Several aspects of this translation are analyzed, such as the process of shortening the original text, the omission of its autobiographical parts, translational strategies and mistakes. The edition of the Treatise on the Holy Land, preserved only in two copies, is presented as a supplement.

9

Uwagi o dokumentach rozejmowych i pokojowych z okresu wojny 1409–1411

63%

Szweda A.

Zapiski Historyczne

|

2010

|

tom 75

|

nr 2

66-85

EN

The article is devoted to documents of armistice concluded during the war of Poland and Lithuania with the Teutonic Order in the years 1409–1411, and also to documents of the Peace Treaty of Thorn. The first of the armistice treaties, written on 8 October 1409, was exceptional, as it was made through the agency of the Roman and Czech king Wenceslaus IV. This was the reason why the Teutonic and Polish documents were written in German. Seals were also not typical of armistice: the Grand Master Ulrich von Jungingen affixed the great seal of the Teutonic Order whereas Władysław Jagiełło put his bigger seal with the coat of arms. There also appeared seals of guarantors from both sides. The armistice was made until 24 June, whereas on 26 June 1410 Jagiełło issued a document prolonging the armistice until 4 July. It was an act written in a simplified form, without guarantors, with a smaller seal of the monarch. The Teutonic equivalent did not survive. Diplomas from the armistice of 9 December 1410 survived. The Polish document causes interpretation problems as it includes mistakes in the list of guarantors, and the number and order of the seals affixed. The preliminary documents of the First Treaty of Thorn were recorded and enumerated on 1 February 1411. They were made in the name of the monarchs, affixed with smaller sigils and seals of negotiators. The main peace documents were sealed and enumerated on 10 May 1411 near Złotoria. The Teutonic document bore 41 seals; the emblem of the Master Henrich von Plauen did not survive. The Polish-Lithuanian document is known exclusively thanks to descriptions in notary devices. It bore 38 seals, including the sigil of Władysław Jagiełło and the Great Prince Vytautas. Probably the act, like many others, was passed on to the King Sigismund I the Old by the Duke Albert of Hohenzollern in 1526. Soon after it disappeared and it was not recorded in the inventories of the Crown Archive preserved from the mid-16th century.

10

Zwyczaje dworskie w wybranych miniaturach "Bardzo bogatych godzinek księcia de Berry

63%

Smarz I.

Folia Bibliologica

|

2010

|

tom 52

85-114

PL

Celem artykułu jest przedstawienie zwyczajów dworskich, odzwierciedlonych na miniaturach styczniowej i kwietniowej w Bardzo bogatych godzinkach księcia de Berry. Zagadnienia te omówiono, sięgając do szerokiego kontekstu historycznego. Ważnym celem podjętych badań było ponadto zidentyfikowanie postaci znajdujących się na iluminacjach. Zwyczaje dworskie, na których skupiono uwagę, to uczta i zaręczyny w okresie późnego średniowiecza na terenie Francji. Zaprezentowane rozrywki i elementy obyczajów dworskich znajdują odzwierciedlenie na miniaturach Bardzo bogatych godzinek.

11

Inkunabuł Operii sancti Ambrosii pars tertia (1492 r.) z oficyny Jana Amerbacha w zbiorach Biblioteki Księży Marianów w Lublinie

51%

Brzozowski P.

Folia Bibliologica

|

2008

|

tom 50

31-55