PL
 |
EN
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Polish version English version Język
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 8

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available Procedural Autonomy of Member States and the EU Rights of Defence in Antitrust Proceedings
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2012
|
tom 5(6)
215-234
EN
The general rule concerning the application of EU law in the Member States is that, unless the procedural issues are directly regulated in EU primary or secondary law, the Member States possess a so-called ‘procedural autonomy’. This rule applies fully to national antitrust proceedings, where the presumed infringement may affect trade between EU Member States (decentralised EU antitrust proceedings). However, the procedural guarantees offered to undertakings in EU antitrust proceedings before the European Commission, often referred to the undertakings’ ‘rights of defence’, also form a part of the procedural acquis of EU law. This article examines the question whether that procedural acquis, stemming mainly from EU courts’s jurisprudence and formulated with regard to the proceedings before the European Commission, should be applied as a standard in national (i.e. Polish) antitrust proceedings where EU law applies.
FR
L’application du droit de l’Union européenne requiert la mise en oeuvre du principe de l’autonomie procédurale. Celui-ci signifie qu’à supposer qu’un problème procédural n’ait pas été réglé par le droit communautaire originaire ou dérivé, les États membres sont compétents pour le régler. Ce principe s’applique pleinement aux procédures de concurrence dans lesquelles la violation présumée est susceptible de produire des effets sur les échanges commerciaux entre les États membres (« procédure communautaire décentralisée en matière de concurrence »). Cependant, les garanties procédurales dont les entreprises disposent en cours de procédures de concurrence se déroulant devant la Commission européenne et qu’on définit généralement comme « droits à la défense », constituent également une partie de l’acquis procédural communautaire. Le présent texte tâche de répondre à la question de savoir si cet acquis procédural, résultant de la jurisprudence des juges communautaires et concernant les procédures qui se déroulent devant la Commission européenne, doit être un standard pour les procédures de concurrence internes où l’on applique les textes juridiques de l’UE.
2
Content available M. Arcari, L. Balmond (eds.), La Gouvernance globale face aux défis de la sécurité collective. Global Governance and the Challenges of Collective Security, Editoriale Scientifica, 2012, pp. 430
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Polish Yearbook of International Law
|
2012
|
tom 32
3
Content available remote The Rule of Law in the European Union — is there a common definition?
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Przegląd Prawa i Administracji
|
2016
|
tom 107
165-179
PL
Tematem opracowania jest problematyka ochrony zasady państwa prawa w prawie Unii Europejskiej. Przedstawione zostały zarówno rozważania teoretyczne nad samym pojęciem zasady państwa prawa w Unii Europejskiej, jak i aktualne tendencje, by do tej zasady sięgać w związku z rozwojem sytuacji politycznej w niektórych państwach członkowskich UE.
4
Content available The publication of the European Commission’s guidelines in an official language of a new Member State as a condition for their application Case comment to the order of the Polish Supreme Court of 3 September 2009 (Ref. No. III SK 16/09 ) to refer a preliminary question to the Court of Justice of the European Union (C-410/99 Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa sp. z o.o. v President of the Electronic Communications Office)
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2010
|
tom 3(3)
5
Content available Intensity of Judicial Review of Fines in EU Competition Law
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2019
|
tom 12
|
nr 19
9-28
FR
Cet article examine l’étendue des activités du Tribunal de l’Union européenne dans le cadre de sa pleine juridiction en matière de droit de la concurrence. Il s’agit d’aborder trois questions principales: quel est la portée exacte de la pleine juridiction exercée par le Tribunal? Quelle devrait être l’intensité de son contrôle exercé dans le cadre de cette pleine juridiction? Et de quelle manière ce contrôle fonctionne-t-il en pratique (comment réadapter ou recalculer le montant de l’amende et, le cas échéant, remplacer le raisonnement de la Commission européenne)?
EN
This article examines the scope of the activism of the General Court while exercising its so called unlimited jurisdiction in antitrust matters. It addresses three main questions: what is the exact scope of unlimited jurisdiction; what should the intensity of control in case of unlimited jurisdiction; and how does the functioning of control in case of unlimited jurisdiction looks in practice (how to readapt or recalculate the amount of fine and, if the court is prone to do this, how to replace the reasoning of the European Commission).
6
Content available Tadeusz Skoczny, Agata Jurkowska (eds.), Orzecznictwo sądów wspólnotowych w sprawach konkurencji w latach 1964-2004 [Jurisprudence of the European Community Courts in competition matters in years 1964-2004], Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa 2007, 920 p.
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
|
2008
|
nr 1(1)
281-290
7
Content available À la recherche d’une cohérence perdue – Possible Arguments for the Non-application of EU Law in Member States
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
Polish Yearbook of International Law
|
2013
|
tom 33
171-187
EN
The European Union is an international organization which has a broad scope of competences that have been transferred to it by its Member States in the founding Treaties. The object of this text is to identify arguments raised, or that potentially might be raised, by national Constitutional Courts (and in the future possibly by other actors as well) to exclude in certain instances the application of EU law or EU jurisprudence in the territory of a particular Member State. The three main reasons for such an exclusion might be: 1) that an action of the EU is perceived as being ultra vires; 2) that an action of the EU infringes on national identity; and 3) that an action of the EU infringes on constitutional identity. The ultra vires argument has only recently appeared in the jurisprudence of some constitutional courts, whereas the constitutional identity argument has been present since the 1970s. The national identity argument is based on a notion protected, since 1993, by the Treaty establishing the European Union. All three of these arguments are to a certain extent intermingled and their use by national actors for excluding the application of EU law is fraught with uncertainty.
8
Content available Wprowadzenie Gościa Honorowego
100%
Kowalik-Bańczyk K.
internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
|
2021
|
tom 10
|
nr 3
7-9
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.