Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Problemy z granicami jurysdykcji Trybunału Konstytucyjnego nad traktatami unijnymi. Uwagi na marginesie sprawy sygn. akt K 3/21

100%

Ziółkowski M.

|

2024

|

nr 3(79)

45-58

PL

Artykuł rozpoczyna podsumowanie aktualnego stanu dyskusji doktrynalnej o przełomowym wyroku TK w sprawie sygn. akt K 3/21, w którym uznał on przepisy (w określonej interpretacji) Traktatu o Unii Europejskiej za niekonstytucyjne. Trybunał czekał ponad rok z pisemnym uzasadnieniem, w którym znalazły się odniesienie do wielu kluczowych zarówno prawa konstytucyjnego, jak prawa UE tematów, w tym uwagi o zasadzie pierwszeństwa, zasadzie subsydiarności oraz tożsamości konstytucyjnej. Niemniej istotne są nowe rozważania Trybunału Konstytucyjnego o możliwości wykonywania własnej jurysdykcji nad unijnymi traktatami. Artykuł najpierw rekonstruuje argumenty Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, po czym poddaje je doktrynalnej krytyce. Zdaniem Autora kluczowe jest nie tyle pytanie, czy TK może kontrolować traktaty, ale w jakich granicach może ową kontrolę sprawować. Artykuł zawiera wskazówki pozwalające wyznaczyć owe granice.

EN

The article begins with an examination of the doctrinal debate surrounding the judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal, which declared certain provisions of the Treaty on European Union to be unconstitutional. The Tribunal took over a year to provide written justification, covering crucial topics in constituional law and the EU law such as primacy, subsidiarity, and constitutional identity. One of the notable changes was the Tribunal’s new approach to jurisdiction over the Treaties. The article, which has a doctrinal and interpretive nature, discusses and critiques the Tribunal’s arguments. The author believes that the question is not whether the Tribunal has the power to review the treaties, but what the constitutional limits of this power are. The article offers suggestions on how to limit the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.

2

Causa irrationabilitatis, czyli o źródłach transhumanistycznej antropologii

100%

Ziółkowski M.

Rocznik Tomistyczny

|

2020

|

tom 2

|

nr 9

203-226

EN

The aim of this paper is to show source inspirations on which anthropological model of transhumanist doctrine has been built. Fundamental thesis of transhumanism says that there is possibility of transgressing the natural condition of man through the various latest technologies what suppose to develop more excellent human’s essential form. The author turns attention to the fact that there is a category of possible beings and ontology of transfer adopted by transhumanist doctrine and that there is no essential differentiation between two notions such as „being” and „product”. For that reason it is impossible to apply aparatus of Thomisitic metaphysics to that doctrine. Another element which shows discrepancy of both stances is, analysed by the author, opposition between materialistic-naturalistic transhumanist anthropological model, called on the ground of natural science encephalocentrism and hylemorfism proper for Christian antropology. The author shows irrationality of many anthropological ideas of transhumanist doctrine and also presents its two main sources. The first is ideologization in the area of natural science whose extreme appearance we find in reductionist encephalocentrism. The second is extrapolation of reductionist encephalocentrism stance along with stances of technological probabilism into religious domain of anti-Christian antic gnostic systems. The author ultimately states that transhumanism is ideology which skillfully transforms gnostic mysticism into „new garments” of the latest technologies and for that, it effectively resonates in a contemporary irrational anti-culture.

3

Nowa dyrektywa tytoniowa w świetle postanowień Konstytucji RP

63%

Gruszczyński Ł. , Ziółkowski M.

|

nr 1 (197)

73-111

EN

The article assesses the compatibility of the new Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) with the Polish Constitution. It concludes that although the Polish Constitutional Tribunal remains in principle competent to review acts of EU law (including directives if certain conditions are met), the scope of such a review is very limited and consists only of assessing whether EU institutions acted within scope of the competences transferred to them. The same holds true for domestic measures which merely implement directives. As a consequence, any review of the TPD provisions will be very restricted and can hardly lead to their inapplicability on the Polish territory. The article also assesses the compatibility with the Polish Constitution of the plain packaging requirement, which is not provided for, but only suggested by the TPD. In this context, it concludes that the Tribunal will be fully competent to review any national measure that introduces such a restriction. Although the outcome of such a review cannot be predicted with certainty, the article posits that there are good grounds to believe that the plain packaging requirement will be considered constitutional (i.e. in particular with respect to those provisions of the Constitution which protect property and freedom of economic activity).