Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Mesjańska maszyna – szkic teorii mesjanizmu

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

Logos i Ethos

|

2018

|

tom 47

|

nr 1

EN

This article is an attempt at creating the outline of the theory of messianism, that would cover both the various versions of Jewish Messianic, Christian, and Islamic, as well as secular. I propose to think of messianism as a transcendental field of origin, therefore as a machine in the sense proposed by Deleuze. This theory reveals the weak points of contemporary Polish Messianic thought, represented by Pawel Rojek and his book Liturgia dziejów.

PL

Artykuł jest próbą stworzenia zarysu teorii mesjanizmu, która obejmowałaby zarówno rozmaite wersje żydowskich mesjanizmów, chrześcijańskich i islamskich, jak i świeckich. Proponuję pomyśleć mesjanizm jako transcendentalne pole genezy, a więc jako maszynę w rozumieniu zaproponowanym przez Deleuze’a. Taka teoria ujawnia słabe punkty polskiej współczesnej myśli mesjańskiej, której reprezentantem jest Paweł Rojek.

2

truktury uczestnictwa w filozofii dramatu Józefa Tischnera

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

Logos i Ethos

|

2018

|

tom 48

|

nr 2

EN

The article is an analysis of how the concept of participation functions in the philosophy of drama by Józef Tischner. I begin by saying that this is the basic concept of this philosophy. Tischner gives two basic meanings of the drama using the concept of participation and then uses this concept very often. In my analysis, I observe how Tischner uses this concept, I investigate who participates and in what they participate, and I also reconstruct the structure of this participation. As a result it is revealed that the specific understanding of this concept is related to other basic concepts of this philosophy, e.g. to reciprocity or horizon. It also reveals – which is quite a surprise – an egological component of the philosophy of drama.

PL

Artykuł jest analizą sposobu, w jaki funkcjonuje w filozofii dramatu Józefa Tischnera pojęcie uczestnictwa. Wychodzę od stwierdzenia, że jest to podstawowe pojęcie tej filozofii. Za jego pomocą Tischner podaje dwa podstawowe znaczenia dramatu, a następnie bardzo często używa tego pojęcia. W mojej analizie obserwuję, w jaki sposób Tischner je stosuje, badam, kto uczestniczy i w czym, a także odtwarzam struktury tego uczestnictwa. W efekcie ujawnia się, że specyficzne rozumienie „uczestnictwa” powiązane jest z innymi podstawowymi pojęciami tej filozofii, np. ze wzajemnością czy horyzontem. Ujawnia się także – co jest sporym zaskoczeniem – egologiczny komponent filozofii dramatu.

3

Człowiek bez ojczyzny – powtórzona lektura „Listu o humanizmie” Heideggera

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna

|

2017

|

tom 6

|

nr 1

53-76

EN

The article is an attempt to read the Letter of humanism in the light of the project Beyng. First of all I say that the figure of Da-sein is crucial for understanding the Letter. My considerations focus in particular on the position which a man occupies in the structure of Da-sein. I show that there is an analogy between this structure and the considerations of the Letter. I say also that this letter made transposition of the term „humanism” into the other beginning. The project of humanism, which emerges from this text does not coincide neither with today’s varieties of humanism, nor the post-humanism, because both of these forms of thought are inscribed in metaphysics. In this context „no homeland” of which Heidegger says in the Letter, takes on special significance, which I wanted to show.

PL

The article is an attempt to read the Letter of humanismin the light of the project Beyng. First of all I say that the figure of Da-sein is crucial for understanding the Letter. My considerations focus in particular on the position which a man occupies in the structure of Da-sein. I show that there is an analogy between this structure and the considerations of the Letter. I say also that this letter made transposition of the term „humanism” into the other beginning. The project of humanism, which emerges from this text does not coincide neither with today’s varieties of humanism, nor the post-humanism, because both of these forms of thought are inscribed in metaphysics. In this context „no homeland” of which Heidegger says in the Letter, takes on special significance, which I wanted to show.

4

Ist die Heideggersche Philosophie des Seyns Mystik?

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2017

|

tom 7

|

nr 2

311-331

PL

Is Heidegger’s philosophy of Being (Seyn) a mystique? In this article I examine whether late Heidegger’s philosophy (Gesamtausgabe volumes 65–74) can be called a mysticism. For serious reasons the answer should be negative. Heidegger’s early statements relating to the mystique are very unflattering. I try to grasp what the Heidegger’s exact attitude to the mystique is. Reflections on the mystique do not appear in late Heidegger’s philosophy (with one exception). Heidegger treats the term “mysticism” as an objection to thinking, which consists in masking a lack of understanding of thinking. According to the immanent criteria, the philosophy of Being cannot be called the mystique. But it is possible to transpose the concept of the mystique, which means to carry the word from the first in another beginning. The second part of my work is an attempt at such a transposition. As a result I obtain the word “mysticism” conceived from the side of Being, that is as a source for mysticism conceived in the traditional way. So I can say that the philosophy of Being is a mystique in this particular sense of this word.

5

Introduction to the issue: What is philosophy today?

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2023

|

tom 13

|

nr 2

217-218

6

Roszczenie filozofii do ogólności

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2023

|

tom 13

|

nr 2

293-311

EN

In the article I argue that the claim for generality belongs to the essence of philosophy. The problem with this formulation lies in the fact that there is no single understanding of generality. One of the oldest understandings of generality identifies it with abstraction. In the text, using the example of algebra, I show how much this way of thinking has developed in mathematics. Then I point to other - non-formal and non-abstract - understandings of generality in Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Martin Heidegger and Jacques Derrida. I conclude by formulating the conclusion that philosophy, of course here only some variety of it, not every philosophy, produces a new understanding of generality, but since none of them can be considered final, and therefore philosophy’s claim to generality has not been satisfied, philosophy is in effect in a permanent crisis.

7

Figura Mesjasza. Próba konstrukcji pojęcia

100%

Kołoczek Ł.

Kwartalnik Filozoficzny

|

2013

|

tom 41

|

nr 3

55-80

EN

The attempt to construct the philosophical concept of the "messiah" takes place in several steps. The starting point is Agamben's commentary on The Book of Romans of St. Paul. On the basis of this text I reconstruct the messianic structure. At one crucial point the structure coincides with Heidegger’s commentary on St. Paul. It is in light of these preliminary findings that I read the latter’s essay Overcoming Metaphysics. Thanks to this I reveal the structural similarities between Paul's messianic figure and the structure of overcoming metaphysics. In the context of Contributions to philosophy it appears that according to Agamben's version this structure lacks an important point, namely the expectation that constitutes messianic time. I argue that even Derrida's deconstruction project can be interpreted within this framework. In this light I consider the Agamben's objection to Derrida. Finally, I conclude that the structure reconstructed on the basis of Agamben's text is incomplete.

8

Wstęp do ontologii przyrody?

75%

Kołoczek Ł.

Logos i Ethos

|

2021

|

tom 58

|

nr 2

191-201

9

„Czym jest filozofia dzisiaj?” - sprawozdanie z konferencji

63%

Kołoczek Ł. , Płoszczyniec A.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2022

|

tom 12

|

nr 1

265-270