Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Czynniki ryzyka stylów myślenia przestępczego nieletnich

100%

Rode M.

|

tom XIX

|

nr 2

258-274

EN

The discussed research concept is included in the wider stream of issues considering mechanisms of criminogenesis in juvenile delinquents with simultaneous settlement in cognitive psychology paradigm. The basic assumption for the following concept is Glenn Walters’s theory of criminal thinking styles. It claims that in case of a person with criminal functioning, there is a specific way of thinking which is reflected in 8 criminal thinking styles. Referring to Walters’s premises and principles of cognitive psychology it has been accepted that human cognitive system and consequently all dysfunctional beliefs have been established in consideration with physical, social and psychological conditions. Integration-interaction research perspective is concentrated on person’s interaction with internal and external environment. Research aim was to find out which variables are the risk factors for separate thinking styles. It turned out that both psychosocial mothers’ functioning and personality juvenile delinquents’ features are predictors of criminal thinking styles. Especially important role is given to parental attitudes. Important conclusion is that upbringing practices contribute to development of emotional behavior problems of the child. Upbringing practices are the source of the pathological development in cognitive, emotional and control functions. It means that parental behavior is the sort of the connection between their difficult experience and child’s problems. Thus, the role of social environment becomes indisputable for cognitive distortions.

2

Konfiguracja wybranych zmiennych psychologicznych u kobiet odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności

63%

Rode M. , Lubas A.

Prosopon. Europejskie Studia Społeczno-Humanistyczne

|

2018

|

nr 4(25)

77-87

EN

The article presents the emotional characteristics of women incarcerated by a legallyvalid court sentence in reference to their selected personality variables. In conducting the research, a group of female prisoners and a control group were diversified in reference to their empathic abilities and their intensity towards aggression and hostility. In the article the descriptive analysis was used in order to present the inter-group differences. In the study there were a total of 150 individual participants. Research results have shown that those who manifest criminal behavior are driven largely by their emotions, and their stimulation threshold is much lower than individuals with no criminal history. Women who are incarcerated are characterized as having a higher level of suspicion and negativity; while their aggression is based only on an emotional level. Furthermore their empathy is directed towards themselves, not towards others. The results obtained in the article may be utilized to adapt the process of rehabilitation of prisoners according to their personality traits.

3

Psychosocial characteristics of men and women as perpetrators of domestic violence

51%

Rode D. , Rode M. , Januszek M.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

|

2015

|

tom 46

|

nr 1

53-64

EN

The presented study aims to compare men and women (N = 227), perpetrators of domestic violence in terms of psychosocial characteristics, present conditions of socialization in which the perpetrator grew and the motives for committing violent act against partners. The population of violence offenders under study and its sub-groups (women and men) did not differ from the norm group in terms of personality traits and temperament. The differences were noticed only in two KSP scales: secure style and avoidance style. The comparison of women and men revealed differences, in three variables: openness for experience, emotional intelligence and avoidance-ambivalence style. Moreover, study showed that despite the good relationship between the subjects’ parents, some perpetrators suffered violence from the loved ones. It should be noted that women were more affected by physical and psychological aggression in childhood. Analysis of motives to commit acts of violence indicated that they are associated with three factors: advantage over your partner, influence and control.

4

Psychosocial characteristics of men and women as perpetrators of domestic violence

51%

Rode D. , Rode M. , Januszek M.

Polish Psychological Bulletin

|

2015

|

tom 46

|

nr 1

53-64

EN

The presented study aims to compare men and women (N = 227), perpetrators of domestic violence in terms of psychosocial characteristics, present conditions of socialization in which the perpetrator grew and the motives for committing violent act against partners. The population of violence offenders under study and its sub-groups (women and men) did not differ from the norm group in terms of personality traits and temperament. The differences were noticed only in two KSP scales: secure style and avoidance style. The comparison of women and men revealed differences, in three variables: openness for experience, emotional intelligence and avoidance-ambivalence style. Moreover, study showed that despite the good relationship between the subjects’ parents, some perpetrators suffered violence from the loved ones. It should be noted that women were more affected by physical and psychological aggression in childhood. Analysis of motives to commit acts of violence indicated that they are associated with three factors: advantage over your partner, influence and control.

5

Psychological Expertising in Juvenile Delinquency Cases in Poland: Principles for Evaluation of Psychological Opinion

45%

Rode D. , Rode M. , Kabzińska J. , Habzda-Siwek E. , Niewiadomska I.

Teka Komisji Prawniczej

|

2022

|

tom 15

|

nr 2

257-273

EN

In the article analysed the practice of obtaining opinions of expert psychologist in juvenile delinquency cases. The choice of types of cases is premeditated, and is based on their specific character. Juvenile delinquency cases are special in terms of their subjects (children and adolescence) and aims to be achieved (the welfare of the child/adolescence). Forensic psychology expertise plays a significant part in arriving at a court ruling. Therefore, it is important to raise the quality of diagnostic procedures, expertise activities, and to establish evaluation standards for evidence from psychological expertise. The presentation of proposed psychological expertise standards should take a form of guidelines and recommendations to be met by the experts, and serve as an aid to expertise evaluation performed by courts. To reach these goals, we gathered and analyzed court records of juvenile cases in six districts (N = 253). The results of the research are related to a) the analysis of the methodological and diagnostic procedures used by experts in the process of psychological evaluation in juvenile cases and b) the formulation of principles for evaluating the evidence of psychological opinions for trial authorities. The research project indicates the practice of psychological experts by the court, the diagnostic procedure and the method of formulating psychological opinions. The analysis of the material showed, first of all, the diversity of the diagnostic and opinion practices of psychologists, thus confirming the lack of procedures standardizing the process of psychological evaluation. The variety of assessment tools, and method, and areas of diagnosis make difficulties in assessing of the evidentiary value of psychological-court opinions. The lack of principle for assessing level of opinions’ quality may promote the practice of so-called junk science.