Wyniki wyszukiwania - Biblioteka Nauki

1

Konkurence spisovných koncovek ve 3. os. pl. ind. préz. akt. sloves vzoru sází ve zpravodajské rubrice serveru iDNES

100%

Sojka P.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

|

2015

|

tom 98

|

nr 4

190-205

EN

This paper summarises the results of an inquiry into the morphological variation in the present-tense third-person plural of the “sázet” type (this type belongs to class IV, containing verbs with the indicative present stem suffix -í-). There are two possible forms in Standard Czech: sází and sázejí (the form sází was codified alongside sázejí in 1993). The sample examined contains 1 500 occurrences from the online newspaper iDNES (from November 2013 to June 2014). The analysis shows that the prevailing form is sázejí. However, there are several verbs for which a more frequent incidence of the equivalent of the sází form can be regarded as an increasing tendency (particularly chybět, stavět, umět). Comparison with the Czech corpus SYN2013PUB seems to confirm these assumptions.

2

Finnish Ice-hockey Slang

100%

Sojka P.

Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)

|

2012

|

tom 94

|

nr 2

87-99

EN

The article deals with Finnish ice-hockey slang. Its goal consists in stressing a number of Finnish expressions differing from Czech ice-hockey slang rather than in collecting as many expressions as possible (though the number of terms included is about two hundred items). The Finnish vocabulary is divided into six parts: 1. ice-hockey equipment, 2. players and officials, 3. quality of the game, 4. situations on the rink, 5. reaction of the audience to the game being played, 6. nicknames of teams and players. Every part is provided with a number of examples taken from Finnish newspaper reports or a dictionary of colloquial Finnish. A large number of the expressions included are based on figurative meanings, particularly metaphor and metonymy.

3

Tvaroslovná norma a kodifikační autorita

100%

Sojka P.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

|

2019

|

tom 102

|

nr 4

265-276

EN

Since the first edition of the Rules of Czech Orthography in 1902, this reference book has become the official source of both orthographic and morphological codification. However, there are many other widely acknowledged reference books that contradict the Rules in regard to some morphological points. This paper suggests that we should abandon the tradition of considering the Rules to be the cornerstone of Standard Czech morphology by replacing it with a more up-to-date and user-friendly book, namely the Academic Vade Mecum of the Czech Language published in 2014.

4

Kodifikovaná plurálová shoda neuter v nominativu a akuzativu: mizející realita?

100%

Sojka P.

Bohemistyka

|

2018

|

nr 3

205-218

EN

It can hardly be argued that – for historical reasons – the neuter plural agreement has been one of the weak points of the Standard Czech morphology at least since the 1800s. At least since the early 1980s the only codified form (ta velká města zanikla) has been regarded by many speakers and even by many bohemists as too „bookish” whereas the Colloquial Czech form used in informal style in Bohemia (ty velký města zanikly) has still retained a high degree of colloquiality and the Moravian form (ty velké města zanikly) doesn’t meet with general acceptance in Bohemia (according to sociolinguistic research). This paper aims to answer the question to what extent the codified form of neuter plural agreement is applied in present-day TV interviews. The examined specimen contains 200 recordings of the Interview ČT24 show. The 200 interviewees are celebrities from political and social walks of life.

CS

Z historických příčin je plurálová shoda neuter bezesporu jedním ze slabých míst spisovného českého tvarosloví, a to nejméně od počátku 19. století. Přinejmenším od 80. let 20. století je jediná kodifikovaná varianta (ta velká města zanikla) považována mnohými uživateli jazyka, ale i některými bohemisty za vypjatě knižní. Obecněčeská podoba Ty velký města zanikly si však stále zachovala nespisovný charakter a ani moravská podoba Ty velké města zanikly není přijímána jednoznačně kladně (zejména mluvčími z Čech). Tento příspěvek se snaží odpovědět na otázku, jak silnou pozici mají kodifikované varianty v současných televizních interview. Zjištění vycházejí z analýzy 200 vysílání publicistického pořadu Interview ČT24, jehož hosty jsou osobnosti z politické sféry, jakož i z dalších společenských oblastí.

5

Prézentní časování sloves vzorů »kryje« a »kupuje« ve spisovné češtině: variantnost, nebo unifikace?

100%

Sojka P.

Bohemistyka

|

2021

|

nr 1

27-46

EN

The morphological variation in the present-tense conjugation of the kryje and kupuje conjugation types (3rd verb class) as a result of gradual vowel shifts has been in progress since the 15th century. The gradual back shift towards the endings -u and -ou used to be explained as a result of paradigm levelling within the conjugation types of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd verb class. In 1993, these endings were codified alongside with the endings -i and -í. However, this codification act hasn’t met with general approval, because the incidence of the endings -u and -ou in standard language is not equal: while the ending -u has been standardizing, the ending -ou has still retained its markedness or can be even regarded as colloquial, in particular in written standard language. In this paper, we aim to answer the question how the endings -u and -ou are applied in present-day TV journalism, namely in the Interview ČT24 show.

CS

Tvarová konkurence v prézentním časování sloves vzorů kryje a kupuje jako výsledek hláskových změn (v 1sg kryji/kupuji vs. kryju/kupuju; ve 3pl kryjí/kupují vs. kryjou/kupujou) existuje v češtině již od 15. století. Progrese koncovek -u a -ou se tradičně vysvětlovala jako projev tvarového vyrovnávání uvnitř 1.–3. slovesné třídy. V roce 1993 byly proto u vzorů kryje a kupuje koncovky -u a -ou přijaty do kodifikace spisovného jazyka. Toto rozhodnutí se však nesetkalo s všeobecným souhlasem, neboť pozice obou koncovek ve spisovných textech není stejná: zatímco koncovka -u se postupně neutralizuje, koncovka -ou si stále zachovává značný stupeň příznakovosti, či dokonce nespisovnosti (zejména v psaných textech). V tomto příspěvku si klademe otázku, jak se tato tvarová konkurence projevuje v dnešní televizní publicistice, konkrétně v diskusním pořadu Interview ČT24.

6

Instrumentál plurálu - "pádový kámen úrazu“?

100%

Sojka P.

Naše řeč (Our Speech)

|

2020

|

tom 103

|

nr 1-2

131-143

EN

In 1981, four Czech language scholars published a significant paper entitled “The current state and future prospects of Standard Czech codification” in the journal Slovo a slovesnost. The paper contained, among others, a list of non-standard morphological variants that – according to the authors – could or should be included in the Standard Czech codification. In the meantime, some of these proposals have actually been realized. However, according to the authors’ statement, the non-standard -ma variant in the plural of the instrumental case still retained a certain degree of stylistic markedness, even though it was no longer distinctively non-standard. Today, forty years later, we aim to answer the question of to what extent we can still agree with this statement, particularly in spoken journalism.