Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 5

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote Prezydentura polska w pierwszych latach III RP (Paweł Momro)
100%
|
2019
|
nr 5(154)
143–148
EN
Much had been written on presidency in the first years of the Third Republic of Poland, both from the legal-constitutional and political science perspectives. This time, it is about establishing a connection between the manner of exercising the competences of the President of the People’s Republic of Poland and the President of the Republic of Poland in the first years of the systemic transformation by persons exercising this function on the one hand and the policy they represented after obtaining the office. Presidential competences are an important instrument in realizing the policy of a person holding the office of the head of state. In the analyzed period this aspect had been subject to multisided examination as regards the presidency of both general Wojciech Jaruzelski and Lech Wałęsa.
EN
The thesis of the reviewed book that the model of voting for the Sejm of the Polish People’s Republic was imitative in relation to the Soviet law and the electoral practice shaped in the USSR seems to be well proven by Michał Siedziako. The voting for the Sejm of the Polish People’s Republic in 1985 was slightly different, and the election of 1989 was an entirely different matter. As long as the author conducts historical or political considerations, it is difficult to object to his arguments. It is worse when he deals with legal and constitutional issues. Hence, the reviewed monograph can only be considered partially successful, which does not mean that it does not constitute a valuable contribution to further research.
EN
The argument on the Constitutional Tribunal, which lasted from mid-2015 to the end of 2016, concerned three dimensions. First, it was about ascertaining the inadmissibility of electing judges in advance, as provided for by Article 137 of the Constitutional Tribunal Act of 25 June 2015; second, it was about pluralising the composition of the Constitutional Tribunal, and third — about an attempt at establishing a new model of the functioning of a constitutional court by the Law and Justice party. The third issue seemed the most important and is still the object of an ongoing systemic argument transgressing the events from the years 2015–2016, which has so far not been satisfactorily solved. The problem of electing judges was resolved by two rulings of the Constitutional Tribunal: judgment of 3 December 2015 (K 34/15) and the decision of 7 January 2016 (U 8/15). The effect of the Tribunal’s decision was in fact giving the Sejm carte blanche as regards electing judges on 8 October 2015.
|
2022
|
nr 2(169)
223–231
EN
Undoubtedly, the materials contained in the presented volume of Andrzej Walicki’s works constitute a good basis for further research into totalitarianism and the process of detotalitarianisation, especially in relation to the history of the People’s Republic of Poland. However, only the analysis of both the period of Sanation authoritarianism (1926–1939) and post-war left-wing authoritarianism (1944–1948) can provide a more complete picture of totalitarianism and detotalitarianism in the People’s Republic of Poland.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.