Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 5

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
|
|
tom 64
|
nr 1
103-118
EN
Various adverse cutaneous reactions may occur as a result of exposure to wood dust or solid woods. These include allergic contact dermatitis, irritant contact dermatitis and, more rarely, contact urticaria, photoallergic and phototoxic reactions. Also cases of erythema multiforme-like reactions have been reported. Contact dermatitis, both allergic and irritant, is most frequently provoked by exotic woods, e.g. wood of the Dalbergia spp., Machaerium scleroxylon or Tectona grandis. Cutaneous reactions are usually associated with manual or machine woodworking, in occupational setting or as a hobby. As a result of exposure to wood dust, airborne contact dermatitis is often diagnosed. Cases of allergic contact dermatitis due to solid woods of finished articles as jewelry or musical instruments have also been reported. The aim of the paper is to present various adverse skin reactions related to exposure to woods, their causal factors and sources of exposure, based on the review of literature. Med Pr 2013;64(1):103–118
PL
W następstwie narażenia na pył drewna lub materiał drewniany w innej postaci może dochodzić do niepożądanych reakcji skórnych. Obejmują one kontaktowe zapalenie skóry o etiologii alergicznej i z podrażnienia oraz znacznie rzadziej pokrzywkę kontaktową, reakcje fotoalergiczne i fototoksyczne. Opisywano też przypadki rumienia wielopostaciowego. Kontaktowe zapalenie skóry, zarówno alergiczne, jak i z podrażnienia, najczęściej jest spowodowane kontaktem z egzotycznymi gatunkami drewna, takimi jak różne odmiany palisandru czy drewno teak. Występuje ono zwykle u osób zajmujących się zawodowo lub hobbistycznie ręczną albo mechaniczną obróbką drewna. W związku z narażeniem na pył drewna nierzadko obserwuje się powietrznopochodny charakter zmian skórnych. Znane są również przypadki alergicznego kontaktowego zapalenia skóry w następstwie styczności z gotowymi wyrobami drewnianymi, takimi jak biżuteria czy instrumenty muzyczne. Celem pracy jest prezentacja niepożądanych reakcji skórnych związanych z ekspozycją na materiał drewniany, wywołujących je czynników i możliwych źródeł narażenia, na podstawie dostępnego piśmiennictwa. Med. Pr. 2013;64(1):103–118
EN
In recent years occupational skin and respiratory diseases have been more and more frequently diagnosed in small production and service enterprises. The awareness of occupational exposure and its possible health effects among their workers and employers is not sufficient. Beauty salons, in addition to hairdressers and beauticians, frequently employ manicurists and pedicurists. The workers often happen to perform various activities interchangeably. The health status of beauty salons workers has rarely been assessed. The most numerous reports concern hairdressers. In this occupational group, the occurrence of skin lesions induced by wet work and frequent allergy to metals, hair dyes and bleaches and perm solutions has been emphasized, while information about health hazards for being a manicurist or pedicurist in beauty salons is seldom reported. The aim of this paper is to present professional activities (manicure and pedicure, methods of nail stylization), occupational exposure and literature data on work-related adverse health effects in manicurists and pedicurists. Wet work and exposure to solvents, fragrances, resins, metals, gum, detergents may cause skin disorders (contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, photodermatoses), conjunctivitis, anaphylaxis, respiratory tract diseases, including asthma. The discussed occupations are also associated with the increased incidence of bacterial (particularly purulent), viral and fungal infections and cancer. Med Pr 2013;64(4):579–591
PL
W ostatnich latach choroby zawodowe skóry i układu oddechowego rozpoznaje się coraz częściej w małych zakładach produkcyjnych i usługowych. Wśród pracowników i pracodawców tych zakładów wiedza na temat narażenia zawodowego oraz ewentualnych skutków zdrowotnych wynikających z tego narażenia jest niewystarczająca. W salonach fryzjersko-kosmetycznych oprócz fryzjerów i kosmetyczek zatrudnione są również manikiurzystki i pedikiurzystki. Często te same osoby wykonują zamiennie różne usługi. Ocenę stanu zdrowia pracowników tych salonów prowadzono rzadko. Najwięcej opisów dotyczy fryzjerek i fryzjerów. Podkreślano występowanie zmian skórnych spowodowanych pracą w środowisku mokrym oraz bardzo częste uczulenia na metale, środki do barwienia i odbarwiania włosów oraz płyny do trwałej ondulacji. Z kolei informacje o skutkach zdrowotnych pracy osób zatrudnionych na stanowiskach manikiurzystek i pedikiurzystek w zakładach fryzjersko-kosmetycznych są nieliczne i fragmentaryczne. Celem pracy jest prezentacja wykonywanych czynności (manikiur i pedikiur kosmetyczny i leczniczy, metody stylizacji paznokci), narażenia zawodowego oraz danych literaturowych o niepożądanych reakcjach chorobowych, związanych z pracą na tych stanowiskach. Praca w mokrym środowisku oraz narażenie na rozpuszczalniki, środki zapachowe, żywice syntetyczne, metale, gumę, barwniki, detergenty może stwarzać ryzyko powstawania zmian skórnych (kontaktowe zapalenie skóry, pokrzywka, obrzęk naczynioruchowy, fotodermatozy), zapalenia spojówek, reakcji anafilaktycznych i chorób układu oddechowego, w tym astmy. W zawodach tych możliwe są również infekcje bakteryjne, zwłaszcza ropne, oraz wirusowe i grzybicze, a także choroby nowotworowe. Med. Pr. 2013;64(4):579–591
3
51%
EN
Objectives: Evaluation of the allergenic properties of the metal knee or hip joint implants 24 months post surgery and assessment of the relation between allergy to metals and metal implants failure. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in two stages. Stage I (pre-implantation) - 60 patients scheduled for arthroplasty surgery. Personal interview, dermatological examination and patch testing with 0.5% potassium dichromate, 1.0% cobalt chloride, 5.0% nickel sulfate, 2.0% copper sulfate, 2.0% palladium chloride, 100% aluminum, 1% vanadium chloride, 5% vanadium, 10% titanium oxide, 5% molybdenum and 1% ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate were performed. Stage II (post-surgery) - 48 subjects participated in the same procedures as those conducted in Stage I. Results: Stage I - symptoms of "metal dermatitis" were found in 21.7% of the subjects: 27.9% of the females, 5.9% of the males. Positive patch test results were found in 21.7% of the participants, namely to: nickel (20.0%); palladium (13.3%); cobalt (10.0%); and chromium (5.9%). The allergy to metals was confi rmed by patch testing in 84.6% of the subjects with a history of metal dermatitis. Stage II - 10.4% of the participants complained about implant intolerance, 4.2% of the examined persons reported skin lesions. Contact allergy to metals was found in 25.0% of the patients: nickel 20.8%, palladium 10.4%, cobalt 16.7%, chromium 8.3%, vanadium 2.1% Positive post-surgery patch tests results were observed in 10.4% of the patients. The statistical analysis of the pre- and post-surgery patch tests results showed that chromium and cobalt can be allergenic in implants. Conclusions: Metal orthopedic implants may be the primary cause of allergies. that may lead to implant failure. Patch tests screening should be obligatory prior to providing implants to patients reporting symptoms of metal dermatitis. People with confi rmed allergies to metals should be provided with implants free from allergenic metals.
EN
Objectives Manicurists are exposed to various chemicals in nail and skin care products and may develop ocular, nasal, respiratory or skin adverse reactions to them. To investigate the occurrence of ocular, nasal, respiratory and skin problems among manicurists and to identify their causal factors, particularly allergic etiology and occupational origin. Material and Methods Manicurists employed in beauty salons in the central region of Poland were invited to fill in the questionnaire and undergo medical examination, skin prick tests with common aeroallergens, patch tests with European Baseline Series and (Meth)Acrylates Series-Nails and spirometry. Results In the questionnaire adverse nasal symptoms were reported by 70%, ocular – by 58%, respiratory – by 42%, hand eczema – by 43% of manicurists. In the medical interview, the frequency of those complaints was lower: nasal ones – 41%, ocular – 24%, cough – 18%, hand skin dryness – 20%, hand eczema – 6%. Cough and hand skin dryness occurred significantly more frequently than in the case of controls. Contact allergy was found for 41% of manicurists and 35% of controls. The prevalence of nickel sensitization was high in both groups (38% and 27%, respectively). Only 3 manicurists reacted to (meth)acrylates. The frequency of atopic diseases was similar in compared groups. Irritant nasal and respiratory reactions were significantly more prevalent among manicurists (nasal – 18% vs. 2%, p < 0.01; respiratory – 18% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). Work-related nasal irritant reactions were finally diagnosed for 19%, ocular ones – for 13%, respiratory – for 18% and within hand skin – for 23% of manicurists. Conclusions The frequency of workattributed irritant mucosal and skin symptoms among manicurists is high. Exposure to acrylates is an important source of mucosal irritant reactions while occlusive gloves cause irritation of hand skin. The prevalence of nickel allergy among Polish females is high. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2017;30(6):887–896
5
45%
EN
Objectives: The aim of the study was the assessment of local tolerance to nickel implants during 9 months observation in guinea pigs sensitized to nickel before implantation and non-sensitized ones. Materials and Methods: Three groups of guinea pigs were included in the study: 10 sensitized to nickel by the guinea pig maximization test; 10 previously nonsensitized and 10 in control group. In 20 animals (except control group) the nickel implants were inserted in the muscle of the back. After 9 months of observation, the animals were patch-tested with 5% nickel sulfate. Also percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood was examined. Next, the tissue surrounding the implant and skin from the area of patch tests were collected for the histological examination. Results: In 70% of previously sensitized animals, the patch test confirmed the sensitivity to nickel. In 60% of previously non-sensitized animals, a positive reaction to nickel occurred. The results of patch tests in control group were negative. Percentage of eosinophils in peripheral blood was fourfold higher in animals sensitized to nickel than in control group. In histological examination, in the tissue surrounding the implant a dissimilarity concerning the intensity of cellular infiltration was observed between animals previously allergic and non-allergic to nickel. In the 2 of 10 previously sensitized guinea pigs quite severe inflammatory reactions in the inside of connective tissue capsule were noted which may indicate a local allergic reaction. The histological images of skin collected from the positive patch test site corresponded with the typical allergic contact dermatitis. Conclusions: Nickel implants may cause primary sensitization to nickel. The nature of the histological changes in the tissues around the implants in guinea pigs sensitized to nickel may correspond to an allergic reaction. The examination of percentage of eosinophils in blood of guinea pigs may be useful in assessing the allergenic activity of metal alloys containing nickel.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.