Ten serwis zostanie wyłączony 2025-02-11.
Nowa wersja platformy, zawierająca wyłącznie zasoby pełnotekstowe, jest już dostępna.
Przejdź na https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Znaleziono wyników: 11

Liczba wyników na stronie
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
Wyniki wyszukiwania
help Sortuj według:

help Ogranicz wyniki do:
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
PL
1. Słowo wstępne; 2. Testament ustny i pisemny: 2.1. Testament ustny, 2.2. Elementy istotne testamentu pisemnego i fałszerstwa testamentów, 2.3. Klauzule fakultatywne testamentu pisemnego, 2.4. Fałszerstwa testamentów; 3. Podsumowanie.
EN
The author discussed the division of acts of law, accounting for the functional criterion. The acts of law include: 1) legislative acts, 2) acts embodying the rights and duties of cities and citizens, 3) guarantee acts, ensuring the application of the laws from the two previous groups. It is material that a division is made between the acts of special law (privileges: lex specialis) and acts of common law. The functional division of acts of law makes it possible to point at links between the normative acts that establish general law, special effects of law that invalidated special rights of specific groups, and also the acts embodying the law and guarantee acts.
DE
Der Autor bespricht die Aufteilung von Rechtsakten nach funktionellem Kriterium. Als Rechtsakten wurden betrachtet: 1/ die Rechtsbestimmungsakten, 2/ die Akten der Umsetzung von Rechten und Pflichten der Städte und der Stadtbürger, 3/ Garantieakten, deren Funktion die Sicherung der Anwendung von Rechtsakten beider vorgenannten Gruppen ist. Eine wichtige Differenzierung war die Unterscheidung zwischen den speziellen Gesetzen (Privilegien – lex specialis) und den allgemeinen Gesetzen. Die Funktionelle Aufteilung der Rechtsakten erlaubt aufzuzeigen, welche Verbindungen zwischen den Normativakten des allgemeinen Rechts und den speziellen Gesetzen es gibt, die die Geltung des allgemeinen Rechts gegenüber bestimmten Gruppen aufheben, sowie zwischen den Umsetzungsakten und den Garantieakten.
3
100%
EN
When it comes to the Magdeburg Law, the history of the inheritance law constitutes an extremely complex issue. The main reason for that is the fact that the source material is scattered and there exists no universal codification for Polish cities settled with the Magdeburg Law. The article analyses resolutions of city councils as well as deeds issued by city owners concerning inheritance law, focusing upon solutions implemented in several cities settled with Magdeburg Law, including Biecz, Bydgoszcz, Ciężkowice, Inowrocław, Kalisz, Kazimierz by Kraków, Kleparz, Konin, Kraków, Lwów, Myślenice, Nowy Sącz, Olkusz, Poznań, Przemyśl, Skrzynno, Wieliczka. The article discusses matters concerning testamentary inheritance as well as intestate inheritance (ab intestato), the rules of inheritance representation, inheritance debt, disinheritance, and the doctrine of escheat.
EN
Four volumes of sources were published in the recent few years in the series „Fontes Iuris Polonici”. Three of them are Cracow criminal records from 1554–1615, 1589–1604, 1630–1633 and 1679–1690, which were edited by a research group (Wacław Uruszczak, Maciej Mikuła, Krzysztof Fokt, Anna Karabowicz). Another volume includes a criminal court records of Dobczyce (1699–1737), prepared and edited by M. Mikuła. Edited records deliver a valuable information about legal sources, which were in use in legal practice. There were applicate by courts, also by parties (plaintiffs and defendants and their plenipotentiaries). These evidences strengthen a hypothesis of using several written law sources in a legal practice. The pages of the edited sources include links to works of Jodok Damhouder, Andrzej Lipski, Bartłomiej Groicki, Paweł Szczerbic and Mikołaj Jaskier.
PL
W ostatnich kilku latach w ramach serii Fontes Iuris Polonici ukazały się cztery tomy źródeł. Trzy z nich to księgi kryminalne miasta Krakowa z lat 1554–1615, 1589–1604 oraz lat 1630–1633 i 1679–1690, wydane przez zespół kierowany przez Wacława Uruszczaka (Maciej Mikuła, Krzysztof Fokt, Anna Karabowicz). Ponadto w serii ukazała się księga kryminalna miasta Dobczyc z lat 1699–1737, opracowana przez M. Mikułę. Wydane źródła zawierają liczne informacje o stosowaniu w praktyce – zarówno przez sądy, jak i pełnomocników procesowych – przepisów prawa stanowionego. Są to dane, które wzmacniają tezę o szerokim wykorzystaniu prawa spisanego w miejskiej praktyce prawnej. Na kartach tych ksiąg odnaleźć można odwołania do prac prawniczych Jodoka Damhoudera, Andrzeja Lipskiego, Bartłomieja Groickiego, Pawła Szczerbica i Mikołaja Jaskiera.
EN
The reviewed book is an extensive study devoted to criminal trial as conducted in the towns of Southern Poland of early modern period. The author relied on particularly rich source material composed of norm-setting acts, writings of lawyers engaged in theoretical analysis and a large number of court books referring to penal cases, both those presented in the form of manuscripts as well as those that appeared in print. The significance of the study consists in the exploitation by its author of the sources illustrative of legal practice. The author investigated, with a particular precision, the factual course that the municipal criminal trial used to take in more serious penal cases. He laid a particular emphasis on the fairly well source-supported evidentiary proceedings. Worthy of note is his analysis devoted to the substantial law basis according to which the judgements were passed. The analysis showed that in the 16th through 18th centuries, in the municipal courts the local customary law played significant role, apart from that played by the Saxon and Magdeburg legal systems. On the basis of the research that he made the author suggests a conclusion that, despite the differences detectable in the practice of the respective towns, there functioned a uniform municipal penal procedure. The latter was characterized by certain features. These were: 1) the absence – in general – of individualized inquiry that would precede the judicial part of proceedings; 2) the instituting and conducting the judicial proceedings through ex officio method being regarded as something absolutely exceptional; 3) the proceedings were – as a rule – instituted due to the proposal of the plaintiff although sometimes they were instituted through the handing one of the accused to the court; 4) the varying role of the parties engaged in the trial, this being dependant on the specific court; 5) a significant role played by the defence counsels; 6) the lack of limitations that might be imposed on evidentiary proceedings with respect to the specific stage of the trial; 7) the evaluation of evidence based on common sense and not on rigid rules; 8) a slight significance of the appeal proceedings, this might be due to the influence of inquisitional type of procedure. While highly appreciating the practice of criminal courts, the author arrived at a conclusion that remarkably large number of elements of accusatorial and adversary nature that are found in the discussed proceedings locates the criminal trial conducted in the Polish towns of the modern era on the position of the accusatorial and adversary model, the modern elements of inquisitional origin being also detectable in it.
|
|
nr 1
133–145
EN
An intensive development of Polish parliamentarism took place in the 15th century; the composition, procedures and competence scope of the General Sejm (Polish parliament) were being established, an example of which may be the principle that the Polish gentry was to be represented in Parliament by elected deputies – two from each land. Among the numerous regulations established at all kinds of conventions which took place in the early period of Polish parliamentarism, there were issues devoted to cities and town dwellers. Among them, one should mention, among others, regulations relating to trade and trade routes, those counteracting the high costs of life, changes relating to the principles of court proceedings, and taxes. Numerous regulations had to be reevaluated and reconsidered at successive parliamentary sessions, also in the 16th century, which testifies to the fact that due to the resistance of the townsfolk, the regulations passed by the sejm, had not been applied. Yet the overall evaluation of parliamentary legislation dating back to the early period of Polish parliamentarism, does not allow one to conclude that this legislation was unequivocally anti-urban. Numerous laws and regulations which had been passed in the interest of the gentry were also favorable to the townsmen.
|
|
nr 3
405–417
EN
The sources of legal history illustrate the functioning of state structure and the society à trawers les âges. They are doubtless cultural heritage and value. One can view them through prism that is: 1) historical; 2) cognitive; 3) cultural. It is worthwhile to note that a well-prepared edition of the sources of that type facilitates smuggling their cognitive and cultural values. The editing of the sources cannot be replaced by a digitalization of the archives. Of course, the digitalization is needed (since it provides better protection of the archives than the microfilms do, and facilitates the access to the source material). However it cannot replace the function of source editing. The latter, in fact guarantees their the cognitive and cultural aspects of the source material will be brought to light. When edited, the sources material is not only the tool, it turns also into a cultural value. The first Polish editions of sources of legal history were prepared in the 18th century. These were: Volumina Legum (a collection of parliamentary acts), and the edition of international treaties compiled by Maciej Dogiel. The material they contained was still in use in legal practice of the 18th century. In the 19th century the growth of interests in the Poland’s past was stimulative of further editions of sources. They were published in several series. Thus Antoni Zygmunt Helcel established a series Starodawne prawa polskiego pomniki while the Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences printed Archiwum komisji prawniczej. Both series continued publishing the main legal acts and also those illustrative of legal practice from the 13th through 18th centuries. There were also some sources printed beyond the scope of these two series. The efforts of A.Z. Helcel, R. Hube, B. Ulanowski, F. Piekosiński, M. Bobrzyński, S. Kutrzeba and O. Balzer in source exploring were continued after World War II. Those engaged in this work were above all the researchers from Kraków, Warszawa, Poznań. The second series of Starodawne prawa polskiego pomniki was due to the initiative of the Polish Academy of Science, its editor-in-chief being professor Adam Vetulani. Following 1989 it is in the Chair of Polish Legal History at the Jagiellonian University that the task of source editing is continued. It has been for 15 years now that Professor Stanisław Grodziski and his co-workers are engaged in publishing Volumina Constitutionum which is a modern version of the edition of the parliamentary acts of the old-Polish nobiliary Republic. In this millieu it was also Ludwik Łysiak and Karin Nilsen von Stryk who were responsible for publishing the court records illustrative of the cases between 15th through 16th centuries. Professor Wacław Uruszczak and his collaborators were, in their turn, busy editing criminal court records between 16th through 18th centuries.
first rewind previous Strona / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.